When Ethics and Aesthetics Are One and the Same: A Wittgensteinian Perspective on Natural Value
Issue: Vol 9 No. 1 (2015)
Journal: Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture
Subject Areas: Religious Studies
Abstract:
Many environmental philosophers have held naturalness to be a primary source of nature’s value. Seen this way, the nature that is most valuable is wild nature, and ‘wild’ is that which is unmodified by human activity. However, accounts of our attributions of value to the wild often have an aura of elusiveness to them, as if what really matters about nature being wild could not ultimately be captured by words. In an attempt to account for what really matters, I relate our fascination with wild nature to a famous Wittgensteinian quote—‘Ethics and Aesthetics are one and the same’ (Tractatus 2006a: 28, §6.421)—and inspect the ways in which important dimensions of our attributions of value to wild nature can be elucidated by reflecting on such cryptic identification. I claim that the experience of wild nature more than any other experience forces on us the adoption of what Wittgenstein called the view sub specie aeternitatis (‘through the lens of eternity’) leading us to appreciate the miraculous character of anything being the case at all, ourselves included. Accordingly, the value of wild nature lies in its being a most powerful gesture towards the miracle of existence. The experience of wild nature shows us the good of being alive rather than not. This sort of experience is one in which ethics and aesthetics are one and the same.
Author: Marcello Di Paola
References :
Berleant, Arnold. 2004 [1992]. The Aesthetics of Environment (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Brennan, Andrew. 1984. ‘The Moral Standing of Natural Objects’, Environmental Ethics 6: 35-56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19846118.
Callicott, J.B. 2003. ‘A Critique of and an Alternative to the Wilderness Idea’, in Light and Rolston 2003: 437-43.
Carlson, Allen. 1979. ‘Appreciation and the Natural Environment’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37: 267-76. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/430781.
Carroll, Noël. 1993. ‘On Being Moved by Nature: Between Religion and Natural History’, in S. Kemal and I. Gaskell (eds.), Landscape, Natural Beauty and the Arts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 244-66. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1017/CBO9780511554605.012.
Cavell, Stanley. 1980. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (New York: Oxford University Press).
Conant, James. 2005. ‘What “Ethics” in the Tractatus Is Not’, in D.Z. Phillips (ed.),
Religion and Wittgenstein's Legacy (London: Ashgate): 39-88.
———. 2007. ‘Mild Mono-Wittgensteinianism’, in Crary 2007: 31-142.
Conant, James, and Cora Diamond. 2004. ‘On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely’, in M. Kolbel and B. Weiss (eds.), The Lasting Significance of Wittgenstein's Philosophy (London: Routledge): 42-97.
Crary, Alice (ed.). 2007. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Crary, Alice, and Rupert Read (eds.). 2000. The New Wittgenstein (London: Routledge).
Crutzen, Paul, and E. Stoermer. 2000. ‘The “Anthropocene”’, Global Change Newsletter 41: 17-18.
Crutzen, Paul. 2002. ‘Geology of Mankind’, Nature 415.6867: 23.
Diamond, Cora. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Di Paola, Marcello. 2008. ‘The Scapegoat Theory of Causality’, in A. Hieke and H. Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences. Proceedings of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, XVI. Online:
http://wab.uib.no/agora-alws/.
Elliott, Robert. 1997. Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration (London: Routledge). Godlovitch, Stanley. 1994. ‘Icebreakers: Environmentalism and Natural Aesthetics’,
Journal of Applied Philosophy 11.1: 15-30. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-
5930.1994.tb00087.x.
Jamieson, Dale W. 2008. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/
CBO9780511806186.
Katz, Eric. 2000 [1992]. ‘The Big Lie: Human Restoration of Nature’, in W. Throop (ed.), Environmental Restoration: Ethics, Theory, and Practice (Amherst, MA: Humanity Books): 83-93.
Kenny, A. (ed.). 2006. The Wittgenstein Reader (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2nd edn). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470776643.
Light, A., and H. Rolston III (eds.). 2003. Environmental Ethics: An Anthology (Malden, MA: Blackwell).
Lovibond, Sabina. 2007. ‘In Spite of the Misery of the World: Ethics, Contemplation, and the Source of Value’, in Crary 2007: 305-26.
Nelson, Michael P. 2003. ‘An Amalgamation of Wilderness Preservation Arguments’, in Light and Rolston 2003: 413-36.
Paret, Derek. 2008 [1998]. ‘Why Anything? Why This?’, in M. Zimmerman and P. van
Inwagen (eds.), Metaphysics: The Big Questions (London: Blackwell Publishing, 2nd edn): 576-93.
Rolston III, Holmes. 1989. Philosophy Gone Wild: Essays in Environmental Philosophy (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus).
Saito, Yuriko. 1998. ‘Appreciating Nature on Its Own Terms’, Environmental Ethics 20: 135-49.
Scheffier, Samuel. 2010. Equality and Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press).
Stecker, Robert. 1997. ‘The Correct and the Appropriate in the Appreciation of Nature’, British Journal of Aesthetics 37: 393-402. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1093/bjaesthetics/37.4.393.
Taylor, Paul W. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Notebooks 1914–1916 (trans. G.E.M. Anscombe; Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
———. 1980. Culture and Value (trans. P. Finch; Chicago, IL: Blackwell Publishing).
———. 1981. Remarks on Color (ed. G.E.M. Anscombe; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell).
———. 2006a [1921]. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, in Kenny 2006: 2-30.
———. 2006b [1953]. Philosophical Investigations, in Kenny 2006: 50-54.
———. 2006c [1993]. Lecture on Ethics, in Kenny 2006: 251-58.
Zalasiewicz, J. et al. 2010. ‘The New World of the Anthropocene’, Environment Science & Technology 44.7: 2228-31. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es903118j.