Proposals for the Study of Quotations in Indian Philosophical Texts
Issue: Vol 6 No. 2 (2012) Special Issue: “Tradition and the Reuse of Indic Texts”
Journal: Religions of South Asia
Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies
Abstract:
The study of quotations is a largely unexplored field within Indian śāstric literature. Yet, this study may have major implications for the critical constitution of a text, the evaluation of its role within the historical development of the ideas it represents and the understanding of Indian compositional habits. Moreover, it may call into question Western contemporary attitudes to texts as authored entities by showing how heavily this view depends on specific historical circumstances and has, hence, not always and everywhere been the rule. This article examines these issues in comparative context before focusing on a case study from the Tantrarahasya of the post thirteenth-century Prābhākara Mīmāṃsaka, Rāmānujācārya. In this article, I study all sorts of embedded texts, even if not acknowledged to be quotations as such. Hence, the study of quotations coincides with the study of how Indian authors composed their texts re-using previous texts as building blocks. I argue that quotations may also be a useful device for understanding an author’s compositional habits and his/her ‘originality’. This concept is in bad need of a definition applicable in Indian contexts. In fact, Indian classical authors may be judged rather flawed in terms of modern views of plagiarism and are all by and large non-original. Contemporary scholars often look in vain for monographs within Indian śāstra literature and find only commentaries and commentaries on commentaries. But, looking at the way texts are built through quotations and use quotations as springboards, one eventually understands that an Indian author’s skill (and hence originality) can be recognized indeed in his/her apt arrangement of earlier texts.
Author: Elisa Freschi
References :
Burrow, John Anthony. 1982. Medieval Writers and their Work: Middle English Literature 1100–1500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freschi, Elisa. 2008. ‘How Do Exhortative Expressions Work? Bhāvanā and vidhi in Rāmānujācārya and Other Mīmāṃsā Authors.’ Rivista di Studi Orientali 81: 149–85.
Freschi, Elisa. 2012. Duty, Language and Exegesis in Prābhākara Mīmāṃsā: Including an Edition and Translation of Rāmānujācārya's ‘Tantrarahasya’, ‘Śāstraprameyapariccheda’. Jerusalem Studies in Religion and Culture, 17. Leiden: Brill.
Freschi, Elisa, and Tiziana Pontillo. 2012. ‘When One Thing Applies More Than Once: tantra and prasaṅga in Śrautasūtra, Mīmāṃsā and Grammar.’ In Maria Piera Candotti and Tiziana Pontillo (eds), Signless Signification in Ancient India and Beyond: 33–98. London: Anthem Press.
Garge, Damodar Vishnu. 1952. Citations in Śabara-Bhāṣya (A Study). Poona: Deccan College.
Kataoka, Kei. 2004. The Theory of Ritual Action in Mīmāṃsā: Critical Edition and Annotated Japanese Translation of Śābarabhāṣya and Tantravārttika ad 2.1.1-4. Tokyo: Sankibo Press.
Kellner, Birgit. 2007. Jñānaśrimitra’s Anupalabdhirahasya and Sarvaśabdābhāvacarcā: A Critical Edition with a Survey of his Anupalabdhi-Theory. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.
LaFollette, Marcel C. 1992. Stealing into Print. Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Lasic, Horst (ed.). 2000. Jñānaśrīmitras Vyāpticarcā: Sanskrittext, Übersetzung, Analyse. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibet. u. Buddhist. Studien, Univ. Wien.
McCrea, Lawrence. 2002. ‘Novelty of Form and Novelty of Substance in Seventeenth Century Mimamsa.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 30: 481–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022819303379
—2008. ‘Playing with the System: Fragmentation and Individualization in Late Pre-colonial Mīmāṃsā.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 36: 575–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9043-y
Mesquita, Roque. 1997. Madhva und seine unbekannten literarischen Quellen: einige Beobachtungen. De Nobili Research Library, 24. Wien: Sammlung De Nobili..
—2000. Madhva’s Unknown Literary Sources: Some Observations. Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.
—2007. Madhvas Zitate aus den Purāṇas und dem Mahābhārata: eine analytische Zusammenstellung nicht identifizierbarer Quellenzitate in Madhvas Werken nebst Übersetzung und Anmerkungen. De Nobili Research Library, 34. Wien: Sammlung De Nobili.
—2008. Madhva’s Quotes from the Purāṇas and the Mahābhārata: An Analytical Compilation of Untraceable Source-Quotations in Madhva’s Works Along with Footnotes. Delhi: Aditya Prakashan.
Mülke, Markus. 2008. Der Autor und sein Text: die Verfälschung des Originals im Urteil antiker Autoren. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110210439
Nikolsky, Ronit. 2010. ‘Ishmael Sacrifices Grasshoppers.’ In Martin Goodman, George H. van Kooten and Jacques T. A. G. M. van Ruiten (eds), Abraham, the Nations, and the Hagarites: Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Perspective on Kinship with Abraham: 243–62. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Prasad, Leela. 2007. Poetics of Conduct: Oral Narrative and Moral Being in a South Indian Town. New York: Columbia University Press.
Preisendanz, Karin. 2005. ‘The Production of Philosophical Literature in South Asia during the Pre-Colonial Period (15th to 18th Centuries): The Case of the Nyāyasūtra Commentarial Tradition.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 33: 55–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10781-004-9055-1
—2008. ‘Text, Commentary, Annotation: Some Reflections on the Philosophical Genre.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 36: 599–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9036-x
Rastelli, Marion. 2006. Die Tradition des Pāñcarātra im Spiegel der Pārameśvarasaṃhitā. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Schulze, Christian. 2004. ‘Das Phänomen der “Nichtkommentierung” bedeutender Werke.’ In Wilhelm Geerlings and Christian Schulze (eds), Der Kommentar in Antike und Mittelalter Bd.2 Neue Beiträge zu seiner Erforschung: 21–34. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Steinkellner, Ernst. 1988. ‘Methodological Remarks on the Constitution of Sanskrit Texts from the Buddhist Pramāṇa-Tradition.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 32: 103–129.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1996. ‘Lindley Murray and the Concept of Plagiarism.’ In Ingrid Tieken–Boon van Ostade (ed.), Two Hundred Years of Lindley Murray: 81–96. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
Trikha, Himal. 2012. Perspektivismus und Kritik. Der epistemische Pluralismus der Jainas angesichts der Polemik gegen das Vaiśeṣika in Vidyānandins Satyaśāsanaparīkṣā. De Nobili Research Library, 36. Wien: Sammlung De Nobili.