Item Details

Earwitnesses: the type of voice lineup affects the proportion of correct identifications and the realism in confidence judgments

Issue: Vol 21 No. 1 (2014)

Journal: International Journal of Speech Language and the Law

Subject Areas: Linguistics

DOI: 10.1558/ijsll.v21i1.139

Abstract:

According to Tulving and Thomson (1973) similarity in encoding and recall contexts will facilitate recall. We investigated if similarity between the original voice event and the voice-lineup helps people to identify the target from a voice-lineup and helps improve the realism in participants’ confidence judgments of the identification reports. Participants (N=199) tried to identify a voice heard in a dialogue context that simulated two males 22 and 27 years old planning a burglary. In the Text-lineup condition six male speakers read a text from a book and in the Dialogue-lineup condition the same speakers had a dialogue with another male speaker. Each recording lasted approx. 30 seconds. The Text-lineup condition showed better identification accuracy, lower overconfidence and better calibration compared with the Dialogue-lineup condition. These results deviate from Tulving and Thomson’s encoding specificity principle in memory psychology, maybe because text reading provides more useful voice features compared to dialogues.

Author: Farhan Sarwar, Carl Martin Allwood, Elisabeth Zetterholm

View Original Web Page

References :

Blaauw,E.(1991)Phoneticcharacteristicsofspontaneousandread-aloudspeech.InProceedingsoftheESCAWorkshop‘PhoneticsandPhonologyofSpeakingStyles:ReductionandElaborationinSpeechCommunication’12-1–12-5.Barcelona,30September–2October1991.
Bower,G.H.,andMayer,J.D.(1989)Insearchofmood-dependentretrieval.InD.Kuiken(ed.)‘Moodandmemory:Theoryresearchandapplications’,specialissueofJournalofSocialBehaviorandPersonality4:121–156.
Brewer,N.(2006)Usesandabusesofeyewitnessidentificationconfidence.LegalandCriminologicalPsychology11:3–23.
Cutler,B.L.,Penrod,S.D.,andStuve,T.E.(1988)Jurordecisionmakingineyewitnessidentificationcases.LawandHumanBehavior12(1):41–55.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01064273
Eich,E.(1985)Context,memory,andintegrateditem/contextimagery.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:Learning,Memory,andCognition11(4):764–770.
Higham,P.(2002)Strongcuesarenotnecessarilyweak:ThomsonandTulving(1970)andtheencodingspecificityprinciplerevisited.MemoryandCognition30(1):67–80.doi:10.3758/bf03195266
Hollien,H.(2002)ForensicVoiceIdentification.SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Jessen,M.(2007)ForensicreferencedataonarticulationrateinGerman.ScienceandJustice47(2):50–67.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2007.03.003
Jessen,M.(2009)Forensicphoneticsandtheinfluenceofspeakingstyleonglobalmeasuresoffundamentalfrequency.InG.GrewendorfandM.Rathert(eds)FormalLinguisticsandLaw115–40.Berlin:MoutondeGruyer.
Juslin,P.,Olsson,N.,andWinman,A.(1996)Calibrationanddiagnosticityofconfidenceineyewitnessidentification:commentsonwhatcanbeinferredfromthelowconfidence-accuracycorrelation.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:Learning,Memory,andCognition22(5):1304–1316.doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1304
Koopmans-VanBeinum,F.(1991)Spectro-temporalreductionandexpansioninspontaneousandreadspeeck:focuswordsversusnon-focuswords.InProceedingsoftheESCAWorkshop‘PhoneticsandPhonologyofSpeakingStyles:ReductionandElaborationinSpeechCommunication’36-1–36-5.Barcelona,30September–2October1991.
Künzel,H.(1995)Fieldproceduresinforensicspeakerrecognition.InJ.Lewis(ed.)FestschriftforJ.D.O’Connor68–84.London:Routledge.
Laan,G.P.M.(1997)Thecontributionofintonation,segmentaldurations,andspectralfeaturestotheperceptionofaspontaneousandareadspeakingstyle.SpeechCommunication22:43–65.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(97)00012-5
Lichtenstein,S.,andFischhoff,B.(1977)Dothosewhoknowmorealsoknowmoreabouthowmuchtheyknow?OrganizationalBehaviorandHumanPerformance20(2):159–183.doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0
Llisterri,J.(1992)Speakingstylesinspeechresearch.ELSNET/ESCA/SALTWorkshoponIntegratingSpeechandNaturalLanguage.Dublin,Ireland,15–17July1992.
Nairne,J.S.(2002)Themythoftheencoding-retrievalmatch.Memory10(5–6):389–395.doi:10.1080/09658210244000216
Nelson,T.O.(1996)Gammaisameasureoftheaccuracyofpredictingperformanceononeitemrelativetoanotheritem,notoftheabsoluteperformanceonanindividualitemcommentsonSchraw(1995).AppliedCognitivePsychology10(3):257–260.doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199606)10:3<257::aid-acp400>3.0.co;2-9
Olsson,N.,Juslin,P.,andWinman,A.(1998)Realismofconfidenceinearwitnessversuseyewitnessidentification.JournalofExperimentalPsychology:Applied4(2):101–118.doi:10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.101
Pollack,I.,Pickett,J.M.andSumby,W.H.(1954)Ontheidentificationofspeakersbyvoice.JournaloftheAcousticSocietyofAmerica26:403–406.http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1907349
Schraw,G.(2009)Measuringmetacognitivejudgments.InD.J.Hacker,J.DunloskyandA.C.Graesser(eds)HandbookofMetacognitioninEducation415–429.NewYork:Routledge.
Sporer,S.L.,Penrod,S.,Read,D.,andCutler,B.(1995)Choosing,confidence,andaccuracy:ameta-analysisoftheconfidence-accuracyrelationineyewitnessidentificationstudies.PsychologicalBulletin118(3):315–327.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.315
Strangert,E.(1993)Pausingintextsreadaloud.ProceedingsoftheInternationalCongressofPhoneticSciences238–241.Aix-en-Provence,France.
Thomson,D.M.,andTulving,E.(1970)Associativeencodingandretrieval:weakandstrongcues.JournalofExperimentalPsychology86:255–262.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0029997
Trouvain,J.(2003).Tempovariationinspeechproduction:implicationsforspeechsynthesis.Doctoraldissertation,FacultyofPhilosophy,SaarlandUniversity,Saarbrücken,Germany.
Tulving,E.,andThomson,D.M.(1973).Encodingspecificityandretrievalprocessesinepisodicmemory.PsychologicalReview80(5):352–373.doi:10.1037/h0020071
VanWallendael,L.R.,Surace,A.,Parsons,D.H.,andBrown,M.(1994)‘Earwitness’voicerecognition:factorsaffectingaccuracyandimpactonjurors.AppliedCognitivePsychology8(7):661–677.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080705
Wells,G.L.,andBradfield,A.L.(1999)Distortionsineyewitnesses’recollections:canthepostidentification-feedbackeffectbemoderated?PsychologicalScience10(2):138–144.doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00121
Wells,G.L.,Memon,A.,andPenrod,S.D.(2006)Eyewitnessevidence:improvingitsprobativevalue.PsychologicalScienceinthePublicInterest7(2):45–75.
Wells,G.L.,Olson,E.A.,andCharman,S.D.(2002)Theconfidenceofeyewitnessesintheiridentificationsfromlineups.CurrentDirectionsinPsychologicalScience11(5):151–154.doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00189
Wells,G.L.,Small,M.,Penrod,S.D.,Malpass,R.S.,Fulero,S.M.,andBrimacombe,C.A.E.(1998)Eyewitnessidentificationprocedures:recommendationsforlineupsandphotospreads.LawandHumanBehavior22(6):1–39.http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025750605807
Yarmey,A.D.(1995)Earwitnessspeakeridentification.Psychology,PublicPolicy,andLaw1(4):792–816.doi:10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.792
Yarmey,A.D.(2001)Earwitnessdescriptionsandspeakeridentification.ForensicLinguistics8(1):113–122.
Yarmey,A.D.(2007)Thepsychologyofspeakeridentificationandearwitnessmemory.InR.C.Lindsay,D.F.Ross,J.D.ReadandM.P.Toglia(eds)HandbookofEyewitnessPsychologyVol.2,101–136.Mahwah,NJ:LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
Yarmey,A.D.,Yarmey,A.L.,andYarmey,M.J.(1994)Faceandvoiceidentificationsinshowupsandlineups.AppliedCognitivePsychology8(5):453–464.doi:10.1002/acp.2350080504
Yates,J.F.(1994)Subjectiveprobabilityaccuracyanalysis.InG.WrightandP.Ayton(eds)SubjectiveProbability381–410.NewYork:JohnWileyandSons.
Zetterholm,E.,Sarwar,F.,Thorvaldsson,V.,andAllwood,C.M.(2012)Earwitnesses:theeffectoftypeofvocaldifferencesoncorrectidentificationandconfidenceaccuracy.InternationalJournalofSpeech,LanguageandtheLaw19(2):219–237.