Item Details

Civility and Politicized Love in Gandhi

Issue: Vol 8 No. 3 (2014)

Journal: Religions of South Asia

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies

DOI: 10.1558/rosa.v8i3.18414

Abstract:

Gandhi presents a discourse of politicized love which draws heavily from a Christian conception of agape but which does not reduce to the latter. Such love is politicized through a requirement that the best kind of dissenting agents, satyagrahees (the agents called upon to engage in civil disobedience and noncooperation) are also called upon to love their enemies or, if they have none of the latter, at least their opponents. In his most famous political tract, Hind Swaraj (1909), Gandhi equates their struggle, satyagraha, with a politicized ‘love-force’, although this is not quite a definition, given that he also equates satyagraha with many other things. Moreover, there is also an occasional doubling of Gandhi’s account of political agency. Alongside the requirement for love, a requirement which is simultaneously political and spiritual, there is (again occasionally) a more minimal conception of civility from which, I will suggest, a plausible contemporary approach to civil disobedience may be constructed. The contemporary relevance of such a civility based account will then be shown through its application to the phenomenon of self-immolation, which Gandhi did not comment upon in detail but which his attitude towards civility can help us to understand. The point of this inclusion is to show that Gandhi’s approach towards civility extends effectively into new contexts.

Author: Tony Milligan

View Original Web Page

References :

Bartlett, Rosamund. 2011. Tolstoy: A Russian Life. London: Profile Books.


Brown, Judith. M. 1972. Gandhi’s Rise to Power: Indian Politics, 1915–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Brown, Judith. M. 1989. Gandhi: Prisoner of Hope. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.


Bufacchi, V. 2007. Violence and Social Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230246416


Calhoun, C. 2005. ‘The Virtue of Civility.’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (3): 251–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00251.x


Gaita, R. 2000. A Common Humanity. London: Routledge.


Gandhi, M. 1996. Selected Political Writings. Dennis Dalton (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.


—1999. The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi. Electronic Book, New Delhi, Publications Division Government of India. 98 vols. http://www.gandhiserve.org/e/cwmg/cwmg.htm (accessed 4 February 2015).


—2007a. Hind Swaraj and Other Writings. Anthony Parel (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


—2007b. An Autobiography: The Story of my Experiments with Truth. Mahadev Desai (trans.). London: Penguin.


Gier, N. F. 1996. ‘Gandhi and Mahayana Buddhism.’ Journal of Oriental Studies 35 (2): 84–105.


Kolodny, N. 2003. ‘Love as Valuing a Relationship.’ The Philosophical Review 112 (2): 135–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00318108-112-2-135


Leopold, Aldo. 1968. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches from Here and There. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Milligan, T. 2013. Civil Disobedience: Protest, Justification and the Law. London and New York: Bloomsbury.


Naess, A. 2005. ‘Gandhi and Group Conflict: Explorations of Nonviolent Resistance, Satyagraha.’ In H. Glasser (ed.), The Selected Works of Arne Naess, vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer.


Nygren, A. 1969. Agape and Eros. P. S. Watson (trans.). New York: Harper & Row.


Parekh, B. 1989. Colonialism, Tradition and Reform: An Analysis of Gandhi’s Political Discourse. New Delhi and London: Sage.


Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.


Smith, W. 2013. Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. London and New York: Routledge.


Suhrud, T. 2012. Reading Gandhi in Two Tongues and Other Essays. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, http://library.iias.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/366/Reading%20Gandhi%20full%20Text.pdf?sequence=4 (accessed 3 January 2014).


Welchman, J. 2001. ‘Is Ecosabotage Civil Disobedience?’ Philosophy and Geography 4 (1): 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903770124815