Item Details

Current practices regarding discourse analysis and treatment following non-aphasic brain injury: A qualitative study

Issue: Vol 6 No. 2 (2015) .

Journal: Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders

Subject Areas: Linguistics

DOI: 10.1558/jircd.v7i1.25519


Discourse production deficits are a common feature of non-aphasic brain injury (NABI). However, little is known about current practices of speech-language pathologists in the assessment and treatment of discourse production deficits following NABI. A phenomenological approach of inquiry was used to examine the experiences of speech-language pathologists in the assessment and treatment of individuals with NABI, with a particular focus on discourse production deficits. Nine speech-language pathologists participated in semi-structured individual interviews. Participants identified common discourse production deficits and hypothesized about the impact on a person’s quality of life. However, external influences negatively impacted participants’ practice regarding discourse assessment and treatment. External influences included time constraints, lack of standardized data, and the lack of formalized education regarding discourse assessment and treatment. These findings suggest that there is a discrepancy between speech-language pathologists’ values and their actual clinical practice related to the analysis and implementation of treatment for discourse production deficits.

Author: Katherine McComas Maddy, Dana M. Howell, Gilson J. Capilouto

View Original Web Page

References :

Ahern, K. (1999). Ten Tips for Reflexive Bracketing. Qualitative Health Research 9 (3), 407–411.

Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. Aphasiology 14 (9), 875–892.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (2003). Evaluating and treating communication and cognitive disorders: Approaches to referral and collaboration for speech-language pathology and clinical neuropsychology [Technical Report]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Available at

Brady, M., Armstrong, L., and Mackenzie, C. (2005). Further evidence on topic use following right hemisphere brain damage: procedural and descriptive discourse. Aphasiology 19 (8), 731–747.

Brookshire, R. (2003). Introduction to Neurogenic Communication Disorders (6th ed.). St Louis, MO: Mosby.

Brown, J. (2013). On the pulse: SLPs feel continued pressure on clinical judgment. The ASHA Leader 18, 30–31.

Bryan, K. (1988). Assessment of language disorders after right hemisphere damage. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 23 (2), 111–125.

Cannizzaro, M. S., and Coelho, C. (2002). Treatment of story grammar following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 16 (12), 1065–1073.

Carlomagno, S., Giannotti, S., Vorano, L., and Marini, A. (2011). Discourse information content in non-aphasic adults with brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 25 (10), 1010–1018.

Cherney, L., and Canter, G. (1993). Information content in the discourse of patients with probable Alzheimer’s Disease and patients with right brain damage. Aphasiology 21, 123–234.

Christensen, S., Wright, H., Ross, K., and Capilouto, G. (2009). What makes a good story? The naïve rater’s perception. Aphasiology 23 (7–8), 898–913.

Clarke, P., Marshall, V., Black, S., and Colantonio, A. (2002). Well-being after stroke in Canadian seniors: Findings from the Canadian study fo health and aging. Stroke 33 (4), 1016–1021.

Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., and Turkstra, L. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language 26 (4), 223–241.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J., and Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

Davis, G., O’Neil-Pirozzi, T., and Coon, N. (1997). Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after right hemisphere stroke. Brain & Language 56 (2), 183–210.

Doody, O., and Noonan, M. (2013). Preparing and conducting interviews to collect data. Nurse Researcher 20 (5): 28–32.

Duff, M., Proctor, A., and Haley, K. (2002). Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): Assessment and treatment procedures used by speech-language pathologists. Brain Injury 16 (9), 773–787.

Ewing-Cobbs, L., Brookshire, B., Scott, M., and Fletcher, J. (1998). Children’s narratives following traumatic brain injury: Linguistic structure, cohesion, and thematic recall. Brain & Language 61(3), 395–419.

Fischler, I. (2000). Attention, resource allocation, and language. In S. Nadaeu, R. Gonzalez, and B. Crosson (Eds) Aphasia and language: Theory to Practice, 348–370. New York: The Guilford Press.

Galski, T., Tompkins, C., and Johnston, M. (1998). Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 12 (9), 769–782.

Gibbs, G. (2007). Analysing Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publication Company.

Glosser, G., and Deser, T. (1991). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language 40 (1), 67–88.

Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., and Barresi, B. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.

Groenewald, T. (2008). Memos and Memoing. In Given, L. (Ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 505–506. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Halliday, M., and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hartley, L., and Jensen, P. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 5 (3), 267–285.

Hough, M., and Barrow, I. (2003). Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 17 (2), 183–191.

Houghton, C., Casey, D., Shaw, D., and Murphy, K. (2013). Rigour in qualitative case-study research. Nurse Researcher 20 (4), 12–17.

Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., and Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test-2 (BNT-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Mackenzie, A., and Chang., A. (2002). Predictors of quality of life following stroke. Disabilities Rehabilitation 24 (5), 259–265.

Malia, K., Law, P., Sidebottom, L., Bewick, K., Danzinger, S., Schold-Davis, E., Martin-Scull, R., Murphy, K., and Vaidya, A. (2004). Recommendations for best practice in cognitive rehabilitation therapy: Acquired brain injury. Available from

Marini, A., Galetto, V., Zampieri, E., Vorano, L., Zettin, M., and Carlomagno, S. (2011). Narrative language in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 49 (10), 2904–2910.

Marsh, N., and Knight, R. (1991). Relationship between cognitive deficits and social skill after head injury. Neuropsychology 5 (2), 107–117.

Marsh, N., Knight, R., and Godfrey, H. (1990). Long-term psychosocial adjustment following very severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology 4 (1), 13–27.

Mentis, M., and Prutting. C. (1987). Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 30 (1): 88–98.

Miles, M., and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Miller, J., and Iglesias, A. (2012). SALT: Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts. Software for the Analysis of Oral Language. Middleton, WI: SALT Software, LLC.

Murray, L., and Chapey, R. (2001). Assessment of language disorders in adults. In R. Chapey (Ed.). Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders, 55–126. Philadelphia, PA: Williams and Wilkins.

Myers, P. (1993). Narrative expressive deficits associated with right hemisphere damage. In H. Brownell and Y. Joanette (Eds). Narrative Discourse in Neurologically Impaired and Normal Aging Adults, 279–196. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.

Myers, P. (1999). Right Hemisphere Damage Disorders of Communication and Cognition. London: Singular Publishing Group.

O’Brien, S., Xue, Y., Ingersoll, G., and Kelly, A. (2013). Shorter length of stay if associated with worse functional outcomes for medicare beneficiaries with stroke. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association 93 (12), 1592–1602.

Öhman, A. (2005). Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 37 (5), 273–280.

Olness, G. (2005). Discourse genre and verb performance in picture-elicited discourse of adults with aphasia. Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Sanibel, FL.

Park, N., and Ingles, J. (2001). Effectiveness of attention rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 15 (2), 199–210.

Rehak, A., Kaplan, J., and Gardner, H. (1992). Sensitivity to conversational deviance in right-hemisphere damaged patients. Brain and Language, 42 (2), 320–336.

Reistetter, T., Karmarkar, A., Graham, J., Eschbach, K., Kuo, Y., Granger, C., Freeman, H., and Ottenbacher, K. (2014). Regional variation in stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95 (1), 29–38.

Rossman, G., and Rallis. S. (1998). Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rowles, G., and Schoenberg, N. (2002). Qualitative Gerontology: A Contemporary Perspective. New York: Springer.

Ska, B., Duong, A., and Joanette, Y. (2004). Discourse impairments. In R. Kent (Ed.) The MIT Encyclopedia of Communication Disorders, 302–304. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Sohlberg, M., Avery, J., Kennedy, M., Ylvisaker, M., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., and Yorkston, K. (2003). Practice guidelines for direct attention training. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology 11 (3), xix–xxxix.

Srivastava, P., and Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1), 76–84.

Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. New York: Falmer Press.

Trupe, E., and Hillis, A. (1985). Paucity vs verbosity: Another analysis of right hemisphere communication deficits. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology, 83–96. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.

Tuckett, A. (2004). Qualitative research sampling: the very real complexities. Nurse Researcher 12 (1): 47–61.

Turkstra, L., Coelho, C., and Ylvisaker, M. (2005). The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language 26 (4), 214–222.

Ulatowska, H., and Olness, G. (2004). Discourse. In Kent, R. (Ed.) The MIT Encyclopedia of Communication Disorders, 300–302. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Van Leer, E., and Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders 32 (5), 327–348.

van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Youse, K., and Coelho, C. (2009). Treating underlying attention deficits as a means for improving conversational discourse in individuals with closed head injury: A preliminary study. NeuroRehabilitation 24 (4), 355–364.