English Language Learners’ Strategies for Reading Computer-Based Texts at Home and in School
Issue: Vol 33 No. 3 (2016)
Journal: CALICO Journal
This study investigated four elementary-level English language learners’ (ELLs’) use of strategies for reading computer-based texts at home and in school. The ELLs in this study were in the fourth and fifth grades in a public elementary school. We identify the ELLs’ strategies for reading computer-based texts in home and school environments. We present a taxonomy of five reading-strategy categories, which includes 15 total strategies that they pursued at home and in school. We describe the central role of dialogue in helping ELLs learn to read computer-based texts: The learners engaged in real and virtual dialogues with adults, peers, authors, and themselves, in ways that enhanced their development of effective reading strategies. We discuss pedagogical implications of our findings, describing how parents and teachers might work separately and together to facilitate ELLs’ reading in today’s learning contexts that include electronic literacies.
Author: Ho-Ryong Park, Deoksoon Kim
Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. Y. (2008). Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. In S. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of reading comprehension research (pp. 69–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35(6), 499–517. Retrieved from
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(11), 202–232.
Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Press. (Original work published 1979)
Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching: Computer-assisted language learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practice and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356–384. Retrieved from
Berkeley, S., Marshak, L., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2011). Improving student comprehension of social studies text: A self-questioning strategy for inclusive middle school classes. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 105–113. Retrieved from
Chatel, R. (2002). New technology, new literacy: Creating a bridge for English language learners. New England Reading Association Journal, 38(3), 45–49.
Chen, M., Ferdig, R., & Wood, A. (2003). Understanding technology-enhanced storybooks and their roles in teaching and learning: An investigation of electronic storybooks in education. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 3. Retrieved from
Chou, I.-C. (2012). Understanding on-screen reading behaviors in academic contexts: A case study of five graduate English-as-a-second-language students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 411–433. Retrieved from
Cohen, A. D. (2011). Second language learner strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 563–579). New York, NY: Routledge.
Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring literacy on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458–464.
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392. Retrieved from
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257. Retrieved from
Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70–89). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from
Dillon, P. M., & Leonard, D. C. (1998). Multimedia and the Web from A to Z (2nd ed.). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
Elshair, H. M. (2002). The strategies used by students to read educational websites and their relation to website usability and text design (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, PA.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eskey, D. E. (2005). Reading in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 563–579). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International.
Goodman, K. (1984). Unity in reading. In A. Purves & O. Niles (Eds.), Becoming readers in a complex society: 83rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 79–114). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hsieh, P., & Dwyer, F. (2009). The instructional effect of online reading strategies and learning styles on student academic achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 36–50.
Jacobs, G. M., Dufon, P., & Hong, C. H. (1994). L1 and L2 vocabulary glosses in L2 reading passages: Their effectiveness for increasing comprehension and vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Research in Reading, 17(1), 19–28. Retrieved from
Kohl, G. O., Lengua, L. J., & McMahon, R. J. (2000). Parental involvement in school: Conceptualizing multiple dimensions and their relations with family and demographic risk factors. Journal of School Psychology, 38(6), 501–523. Retrieved from
Kommers, P. A. M., Grabinger, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1996). Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K–12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–328. Retrieved from
Lee, J. (2006). Exploring the relationship between electronic literacy and heritage language maintenance. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 93–113.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2010). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Liu, M., Navarrete, C. C., & Wivagg, J. (2014). Potentials of mobile technology for K–12 education: An investigation of iPod touch use for English language learners in the United States. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 115–126.
Loeb, M. (2002). Literacy marriage: A study of intertextuality in a series of short stories by Joyce Carol Oates. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
McKnight, C., Dillon, A., & Richardson, J. (1996). User-centered design of hypertext/hypermedia for education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 622–633). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference.
McPherson, K. (2005). Reading the Internet. Teacher Librarian, 32(5), 60–61.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Myers, D. (1990). Computer game genres. Play & Culture, 3, 286–301.
Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47–71), New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY: Newbury House.
Park, H.-R. (2012). Four English language learners’ experiences and strategy use in learning environments of multiliteracies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, FL.
Park, H.-R., & Helsel, C. (2008). Differences between reading electronic and book-based text: Suggestions and implications for literacy teachers and literacy teacher educators. Journal of Reading Education, 33(3), 28–31.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Perez, B. (1998). Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Richards, J. C., & Anderson, N. A. (2003). How do you know? A strategy to help emergent readers make inferences. The Reading Teacher, 57(3), 290–294.
Rogers, R. R. H., & Wright, V. H. (2008). Assessing technology’s role in communication between parents and middle schools. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 7, 36–58.
Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76–101. Retrieved from
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Rossing, J. P., Miller, W. M., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–26.
Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Serafini, F. (2012). Reading multimodal texts in the 21st century. Research in the Schools, 19(1), 26–32.
Shang, H.-F., & Chang-Chien, I.-J. (2010). The effect of self-questioning strategy on EFL learners’ reading comprehension development. International Journal of Learning, 17(2), 41–54.
Simpson, J. (2005). Learning electronic literacy skills in an online language learning community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 327–435.
Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2010). Web 2.0: How-to for educators. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Stewart, R. A., & Cross, T. L. (1991). The effect of marginal glosses on reading comprehension and retention. Journal of Reading, 35, 4–12.
Thomas, P. (2014). A case study of using a hypermedia pedagogy in a secondary English classroom. English in Australia, 49(1), 53–62.
Türk, E., & Erçetin, G. (2014). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 1–25. Retrieved from
Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children’s media use: Gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(3), 329–348. Retrieved from
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165–205. Retrieved from
Zhang, M. (2013). Supporting middle school students’ online reading of scientific resources: Moving beyond cursory, fragmented, and opportunistic reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 138–152. Retrieved from
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.