Artifactual Interpretation
Issue: Vol 2 No. 1 (2015)
Journal: Journal of Contemporary Archaeology
Subject Areas: Archaeology
Abstract:
Media archaeology has thus far been informed by Michel Foucault's largely metaphorical use of the term "archaeology" to denote an inquiry into "the law of what can be said, the system that governs the appearance of statements as unique events." But the discipline of traditional archaeology, its primary concern being the study of how objects mediate our relationship to the past, has much to offer a *media* archaeology. I outline here some of the intellectual affinities between these two disciplines, with notes toward future methodological exchange.
Author: Grant Wythoff
References :
Alt, C. 2011. “Objects of Our Affection: How Object Orientation Made Computers a Medium.” In Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications, edited by E. Huhtamo and J. Parikka, 278–301. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Binford, L. R. 1962. “Archaeology as Anthropology.” American Antiquity 28(2): 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/278380
Brown, B. 2010. “Materiality.” In Critical Terms for Media Studies, edited by W. J. T Mitchell and M. B. N. Hansen, 49–63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feyerabend, P. 1993. Against Method. London: Verso.
Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Routledge.
Gamble, C. 1998. “Palaeolithic Society and the Release from Proximity: A Network Approach to Intimate Relations.” World Archaeology 29(3): 426–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1998.9980389
Gillespie, T., P. J. Boczkowski and K. A. Foot, eds. 2014. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.001.0001
Hartley, J. 2002. Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: The Key Concepts (3rd edition). London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203449936
Hayles, N. K. and J. Pressman, eds. 2013. Comparative Textual Media: Transforming the Humanities in the Postprint Era. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hodder, I. 2011. “Human-Thing Entanglement: Towards an Integrated Archaeological Perspective.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17(1): 154–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x
Ingold, T. 2007. “Materials against Materiality.” Archaeological Dialogues 14(1): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127
Jonsson, F. A. 2014. “Victorian Anthropocene, 1834-1884.” Paper presented at the Heyman Center for the Humanities Thursday Lecture Series: Materiality, Columbia University, 17 April.
Kirschenbaum, M. G. 2008. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kittler, F. A. 1992. Discourse Networks, 1800/1900. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
____. 1999 [1986] Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated by G. Winthrop-Young and M. Wutz. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Krajewski, M. 2010. Der Diener: Mediengeschichte Einer Figur Zwischen König Und Klient. Auflage: 1. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1993. Gesture and Speech. Translated by A. Bostock Berger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lykke, N., R. Markussen and F. Olesen. 2008. “‘There Are Always More Things Going On Than You Thought!’ Methodologies as Thinking Technologies: Interview with Donna Haraway.” In Bits of Life: Feminism at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience, and Technology, edited by A. Smelik and N. Lykke, 32–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Mackenzie, A. 2010. Wirelessness: Radical Empiricism in Network Cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/
mitpress/9780262014649.001.0001
McLuhan, M. 2001 [1964] Understanding Media. London: Routledge.
Munster, A. 2014. “Materiality.” In The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media, edited by M.-L. Ryan, L. Emerson, and B. J. Robertson, 327–330. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sloterdijk, P. 2012. “Actio in Distans: On Forms of Telerational World-Making.” In Philosophy of Communication, edited by B. G. Chang and G. C. Butchart, 635–648. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sprenger, F. and C. Engemann. 2014. “DCRL & MECS Summer School 2015: Challenging Methods.” Leuphana Centre for Digital Cultures. Available online: http://cdc.leuphana.com/news/news/blog-article/dcrl-mecs-summer-school-2015-challenging-methods/
Tholen, G. C. 2002. “Media Metaphorology: Irritations in the Epistemic Field of Media Studies.” South Atlantic Quarterly 101(3): 659–672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-3-659
Uricchio, W. 1981. “The Motion Picture as a Resource for Industrial Archaeology.” Industrial Archaeology 3: 233–237.
Vogl, J. 2008. “Becoming-Media: Galileo’s Telescope.” Grey Room 29: 14–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/grey.2007.1.29.14
Williams, R. 2005 [1978]. “Problems of Materialism.” In Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays, by R. Williams, 103–122. London: Verso.