AnArcheology for AnArchives: Why Do We Need—Especially for the Arts—A Complementary Concept to the Archive?
Issue: Vol 2 No. 1 (2015)
Journal: Journal of Contemporary Archaeology
Subject Areas: Archaeology
The archive serves to organize mental and enforced orders in the shape of appropriate structures and to preserve the memory of past orders through their material-discursive traces. From the perspective of a logic of the manifold, however, the fruitless search for the one origin is as meaningless as the definition of a future. Yet, to work on the conceptualization and further development of utopian spaces of possibility does not necessarily involve the abandoning of either conventional archaeological practices or established archives. Rather, in this paper, I make a plea for effective complements, which involve thought-provoking nomenclatures. Anarchives and anarchaeology present such performative provocations. Following a logic of plurality and wealth of variants, they are particularly suited to handle events and movements. They do not lay claim to leadership. Nor do they claim to truthfully know where things come from and where they may be headed to. The origin is and remains a trap. Anarchives and anarchaeological practices do not follow any external purpose; they indulge in waste and offer presents best-suited to the contemporary remains of the arts. They insist on the utopian potential within archaeology: the search for a world not identical to the one we experience(d), the opposition of the factual space of past with a potential space that lets both, however tensely, approach each other.
Author: Siegfried Zielinski, Geoffrey Winthrop-Young
Blanchot, M. 1971. L’Amitié. Paris: Gallimard.
Buckley, B. and J. Conomos, eds. Forthcoming. Erasure: The Spectre of Cultural Memory. London: Libris.
Derieux, F., ed. 2007. Harald Szeemann: Individual Methodology. Zürich: JRP Ringier and Grenoble: Le Magasin.
Fludd, R. 1617. Utriusque Cosmi Maioris scilicet et Minoris, Metap(h)ysica, Physica atque Technica Historia. Tomus Primus: de Macrocosmi Historia in duos tractatus divisa. Oppenheim: Johann.-Theod. de Bry.
Foucault, M. 2014. On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1979-1980. Translated by G. Burchell. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137491824
Giannetti, C., ed. 2014. AnArchive(s) – eine minimale Enzyklopädie zur Archäologie und Variantologie der Künste und Medien. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König und Edith-Russ-Haus für Medienkunst Oldenburg.
Godard, J.-L. 1980. Introduction à une véritable histoire du cinéma. Volume 1. Paris: Albatros.
____.and Y. Ishaghpour. 2005. Cinema: The Archaeology of Film and the Memory of a Century. Translated by J. Howe. Oxford: Berg.
Herbert, N. 1999. “Werner Alone Has Looked on Reality Bare: Proposal for a Really New ‘New Physics’.” In Ars Electronica: Facing the Future: A Survey of Two Decades, edited by T. Druckrey with Ars Electronica, 101–106. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First published in 1990.
Irrgang, D., ed. Forthcoming. Forum zur Genealogie des Mediendenkens. Volume 3: Siegfried Zielinski im Gespräch mit Nils Roeller, Knut Ebeling, VALIE EXPORT, Otto Roessler, Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. Berlin: Kadmos Publishers.
König, G. M. 1963. “Interview with Nam June Paik.” Magnum 47: 32–34.
Link, D. Forthcoming. Archaeology of Algorithmic Artefacts. Minneapolis, MN: Univocal.
Ward, M. 2012. “Restoration Award for Love Letter Writer.” BBC News, 12 October. Available online: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19922414
Zielinski, S. 2015 “Künstlerische Anarchive—Herkünfte als Ressource für Zukünfte.” In Am Rande der Archive, edited by F. Schmieder and D. Weidner. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.