When Digital is Physical and Ethnomusicologists are File Sharers
Issue: Vol 2 No. 1 (2015)
Journal: Journal of World Popular Music
This article explores a scenario where digital tools of music production, distribution and consumption are prominent, but the role of the Internet has been less significant. This tends to reveal the importance of the physical aspects of digital technologies, an area that has to date been under-explored. Based on work centred on the creation and distribution of recorded popular music in the Central Province of Papua New Guinea, small home-based recording studios and mobile phones are discussed as pivotal technologies. In just a few years, the chain of production, distribution and consumption of popular music in Papua New Guinea has moved from studios, cassettes and cassette players to laptops, SD cards and phones. Production has moved from centralised and professional to more widespread and amateur. Sharing takes place through the exchange of digital music files (usually in the mp3 format) via Bluetooth networking, and the exchange of portable digital media such as Secure Digital (SD) cards. This raises concerns about the ethics of file sharing as part of ethnomusicological research practice. It is also suggested that, due to the increasingly non-commercial nature of this scene, a movement away from the language of industry is timely. Consequently, production, distribution and consumption are more appropriately referred to as creation, sharing and listening/using. Two main conclusions are explored. Firstly, it is argued that the value of local knowledge is intensified under conditions of increasingly distributed, amateur production, and that this activity reinforces the importance of ethnomusicological research approaches that have traditionally been focused more on performance. The second concerns the extent and nature of the commodification of music in Papua New Guinea, and how this raises issues of economic justice for local producers.
Author: Denis Crowdy
Bruns, A. 2009. “From Prosumer to Produser: Understanding User-Led Content Creation.” In Transforming Audiences 2009. London: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation; Creative Industries Faculty; Institute for Creative Industries and Innovation; Journalism, Media & Communication. .
Butterworth, J. 2014. “The Ethics of Success: Paradoxes of the Suffering Neoliberal Self in the Andean Peruvian Music Industry”. Culture, Theory and Critique 55/2: 212–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2014.897243
Crowdy, D. 2005. Guitar Style, Open Tunings and Stringband Music in Papua New Guinea. Apwitihire: Studies in Papua New Guinea Musics, 9. Port Moresby: Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.
Grinnell, C. K. 2009. “From Consumer to Prosumer to Produser: Who Keeps Shifting My Paradigm? (We Do!)”. Public Culture 21/3: 577–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2009-009
King, P. 2014. “Tok Pisin and Mobail Teknoloji”. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 32/2: 118–52.
Len, J. F. 2014. “Introduction: Music, Music Making and Neoliberalism”. Culture, Theory and Critique 55/2: 129–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2014.913847
Liu, J. 2009. “Tough Reality of Copyright Piracy: A Case Study of the Music Industry in China”. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal 27: 621–61.
McCourt, T. 2005. “Collecting Music in the Digital Realm”. Popular Music and Society 28/2: 249–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007760500045394
Morris, J. W. 2012. “Making Music Behave: Metadata and the Digital Music Commodity”. New Media and Society 14/5: 850–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444811430645
O’Connell, J. 1992. “The Fine-Tuning of a Golden Ear: High-End Audio and the Evolutionary Model of Technology”. Technology and Culture 33/1: 1–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3105807
Ouma, M. 2004. “Copyright and the Music Industry in Africa”. Journal of World Intellectual Property 7/6: 919–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2004.tb00234.x
Perlman, M. 2004. “Golden Ears and Meter Readers: The Contest for Epistemic Authority in Audiophilia”. Social Studies of Science 34/5: 783–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312704047613
Philpott, M. 1995. “Developments in Papua New Guinea’s Popular Music Industry”. Perfect Beat 2/3: 98–114.
Schultz, A. and M. Nye. 2014. “Music Ethnography and Recording Technology in the Unbound Digital Era”. In The Oxford Handbook of Mobile Music Studies, edited by S. Gopinath and J. Stanyek, 298–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stern, M. 2014. “Mi Wantem Musik Blong Mi Hemi Blong Evriwan [I Want My Music to be for Everyone]: Digital Developments, Copyright and Music Circulation in Port Vila, Vanuatu”. First Monday 19/10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i10.5551
Sterne, J. 2012. Mp3: The Meaning of a Format. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822395522
Stobart, H. 2010. “Rampant Reproduction and Digital Democracy: Shifting Landscapes of Music Production and Piracy in Bolivia”. Ethnomusicology Forum 19/1: 27–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17411911003669616
Webb, M. 1993. Lokal Musik: Lingua Franca Song and Identity in Papua New Guinea. Apwitihire: Studies in Papua New Guinea Musics, 3. Boroko, PNG: National Research Institute, Cultural Studies Division.
Wilson, O. 2011a. “Ples and the Production of Lokal Music in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea”. PhD thesis. University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
—2011b. “Popular Music and the Continuity of Tradition: An Ethnographic Study of Songs by the Band Paramana Strangers”. In Island Songs: A Global Repertoire, edited by Godfrey Baldacchino, 119–34. Plymouth: Scarecrow Press.
Yu, P. K. 2010. “Digital Copyright and Confuzzling Rhetoric”. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 13: 881–939.