Item Details

Vedic Sacrifice and the Pentadic Theory of Indo-European Ideology

Issue: Vol 9 No. 1 (2015)

Journal: Religions of South Asia

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies

DOI: 10.1558/rosa.v9i1.29441

Abstract:

If the Sanskrit language derives from the unattested but reconstructable proto-Indo-European language, ideas expressed in Sanskrit might derive from a reconstructable proto-Indo-European ideology. In fact, a body of comparative work on material from various regions of the ancient Indo-European-speaking world suggests that such a proto-ideology once existed, and that it survived long enough to leave significant traces in the historical sources. Traces of a pentadic ideology, one based on five ‘supercategories’, have been recognized in many areas of Sanskritic culture, including the varṇa schema, Sāṃkhya and Yoga philosophies, and the plot, heroes and gods of the Mahābhārata. The present article extends the search for pentadic patterns into Vedic ritual (referring mainly to the Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa). In doing so it explores the agents (both human and non-human) that participate in a sacrifice, the classification of offerings, and the layout of the sacrificial ground (both the smaller standard one and the larger uttaravedi). The aim is at the same time to contribute to understandings of the history of the Hindu tradition and to strengthen the hypothesis of an Indo-European pentadic ideology.

Author: Nick Allen

View Original Web Page

References :

Allen, N. J. 1999. ‘Hinduism, Structuralism and Dumézil.’ In E. C. Polomé (ed.), Miscellanea Indo-Europea: 241–60. JI-ES Monograph 33; Washington: Institute for the Study of Man.


— 2005. ‘Thomas McEvilley: The Missing Dimension.’ International Journal of Hindu Studies 9 (1-3): 59–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11407-005-0004-8


— 2007a. ‘The Close and the Distant: A Long-term Perspective.’ In G. Pfeffer (ed.), Periphery and Centre: Studies in Orissan History, Religion and Anthropology: 273–90. Delhi: Manohar.


— 2007b. ‘Śiva and Indo-European Ideology: One Line of Thought.’ International Journal of Hindu Studies 11 (2): 191–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11407-007-9045-5


— 2007c. ‘Dumont e Dumézil: Una comparazione e una combinazione.’ Quaderni di Teoria sociale 7: 11–29.


— 2012a. ‘Idéologie indo-européenne et conflits des chefs dans le Mahābhārata.’ In H. Ménard, P. Sauzeau and J.-F. Thomas (eds.), La pomme d'Éris: Le conflit et sa représentation dans l’Antiquité: 187–200. Montpellier: PULM.


— 2012b. ‘Tetradic Theory and Omaha Systems.’ In T. R. Trautmann and P. M. White (eds.), Crow-Omaha: New Light on a Classic Problem of Kinship Analysis: 51–66. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.


— 2014. ‘Heroes and Pentads; or How Indo-European is Greek Epic?’ Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 57 (1): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.2014.00062.x


Dumézil, Georges. 1974. Religion romaine archaïque. 2nd edn. Paris: Payot.


— 1978. Romans de Scythie et d’alentours. Paris: Payot.


Eggeling, J. 1963 [1882–1900]. The Śatapatha-Brāhmaṇa. 5 vols. Delhi: Motilal.


Falk, Harry. 1989. ‘Soma I and II.’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 52 (1): 77–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00023077


Gonda, Jan. 1962. Les religions de l’Inde I: Védisme et Hindouisme ancien, trans. L. Jospin. Paris: Payot.


Halls, W. D. (trans.). 1964. Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function. London: Cohen & West. See Hubert and Mauss (1968).


Heesterman, J. C. 1993. The Broken World of Sacrifice: An Essay in Ancient Indian Ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922553.001.0001


Hopkins, E. Washburn. 1986 [1915]. Epic Mythology. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.


Houben, J. E. M. 2003. ‘The Soma-Haoma Problem: Introductory Overview and Observations on the Discussion.’ Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 9 (1a), 4 May.


Hubert, H., and M. Mauss. 1968 [1899]. Essai sur la nature et la fonction du sacrifice. In Victor Karady (ed.), Œuvres: 1.193–307. Paris: Minuit. Trans. Halls (1964).


Jamison, Stephanie W. 1996. Sacrificed Wife/Sacrificer’s Wife: Women, Ritual and Hospitality in Ancient India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Jamison, Stephanie W., and Joel Brereton. 2014. The Rigveda: The Earliest Religious Poetry of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Kane, P. V. 1974. History of the Dharmaśāstras: Ancient and Medieval Civil and Religious Law. 2nd edn. 5 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.


Keith, A. B. 1925. Religion and Philosophy of the Veda. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


McClymond, Kathryn. 2003. ‘Death be not Proud: Reevaluating the Role of Killing in Sacrifice.’ International Journal of Hindu Studies 6 (3): 221–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11407-002-0001-0


Macdonell, A. A. 1981 [1898]. Vedic Mythology. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.


Malamoud, Charles. 1989. Cuire le monde: Rite et pensée dans l’Inde ancienne. Paris: La Découverte.


— 2002. Le jumeau solaire. Paris: Seuil.


— 2005. La danse des pierres: Études sur la scène sacrificielle dans l’Inde ancienne. Paris: Seuil.


Minkowski, Christopher. 1989. ‘The Udumbara and its Ritual Significance.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für indische Philosophie 33: 5–23.


Mylius, Klaus. 1995. Wörterbuch des altindischen Rituals. Wichtrach: Institut für Indologie.


Oldenberg, Hermann (trans. S. B. Shrotri). 1988 [1916]. The Religion of the Veda. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.


Renou, Louis. 1978. L’Inde fondamentale: Études d’indianisme réunies et présentées par Charles Malamoud. Paris: Hermann.


Sauzeau, Pierre, and Alain Sauzeau. 2012. La quatrième fonction: Marginalité et altérité dans l'idéologie indo-européenne. Paris: Belles Lettres.


Schwartz, Barry. 1981. Vertical Classification: A Study of Structuralism and the Sociology of Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.


Sen, Chitrabhanu. 1978. A Dictionary of the Vedic Rituals, based on the Śrauta and Gṛhya Sūtras. Delhi: Concept.


Smith, Brian K. 1994. Classifying the Universe: The Ancient Indian Varṇa System and the Origins of Caste. New York: Oxford University Press.


Sukthankar, V. S., S. K. Belvalkar, P. L. Vaidya, et al. (eds.). 1933–1966. The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.


Thompson, George. 2003. ‘Soma and Ecstasy in the Ṛgveda.’ Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies 9 (1a), 4 May.


Weber, Albrecht (ed.). 1924 [1855]. The Çatapatha-Brâhmaṇa in the Mādhyandina-Çākhā. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz. Translated Eggeling (1963).


Woodard, Roger D. 2006. Indo-European Sacred Space: Vedic and Roman Cult. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.