Item Details

Local Buddhist Monastic Agreements among the (Mūla)sarvāstivādins

Issue: Vol 34 No. 1 (2017)

Journal: Buddhist Studies Review

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies

DOI: 10.1558/bsrv.33779

Abstract:

Recently, there have been an increasing number of studies on the Buddhist monastic community as a whole and on individual Buddhist monks and nuns in Vinaya literature. However, we do not know much about how a local Buddhist monastic community was administered. In order to consider just an aspect of the administration in a local monastic community, I will in this paper investigate descriptions of agreements (Skt kriyākāra-) that local monastic communities or local Buddhist monks conclude in Vinaya texts belonging to the (Mūla)sarvāstivādins.

Author: Masanori Shono

View Original Web Page

References :

Chung, Jin-il. Forthcoming. ‘A Sanskrit Fragment Corresponding to Sūtra 481 of the Za-ahan-jing’. Hokkaido Journal of Indian Philosophy and Buddhism 3


Clarke, S. 2016. ‘The ʼDul bar byed pa (Vinītaka) Case-Law Section of the Mūlasarvāstivādin Uttaragrantha: Sources for Guṇaprabhaʼs Vinayasūtra and Indian Buddhist Attitudes towards Sex and Sexuality’. Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 20: 49–196.


Durt, Hubert. 1974. ‘The Counting Stick (Śalākā) and the Majority/Minority Rule in the Buddhist Community’. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū) 23(1): 470–464. https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.23.470


———. 1979. ‘Chū’. In 法寳義林 Hōbōgirin: Dictionnaire encyclopédique du bouddhisme d’après les sources chinoises et japonaises, Cinquiéme fascicule, ed. Sylvain Lévi and J. Takakusu, 431–456. Paris/Tokyo: Adrien-Maisonneuve/Maison Franco-Japonaise.


Enomoto, Fumio. 2000. ‘“Mūlasarvāstivādin” and “Sarvāstivādin”’. In Vividharatnakaraṇḍaka: Festgabe für Adelheid Mette, ed. Christine Chojnacki, Jens-Uwe Hartmann and Volker M. Tschannerl, 239–250. Indica et Tibetica, 37. Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.


———. 2001. ‘Zōagon-kyō no yakushutsu to genten no yurai (On the Original Text and Translation of the Saṃyuktāgama)’. In Bukkyō bunka no kityō to tenkai, vol. 1, 31–41. Tokyo: Sankibō Busshorin.


———. 2004. ‘“Konpon setsuissaiu bu” no tōjyō (Emergence of “Mūlasarvāstivādin”)’. In Studies on Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Thoughts: Volume in Honor of Professor Esho Mikogami, 651–677. Kyoto: Nagatabunsyōdō.


———. 2009. ‘“Shishōtaino gen’i to indo bukkyō niokerusei”’ (The Original Meaning of catvāry āryasatyāni and ārya in Indian Buddhism)’, Hokkaido Journal of Indological and Buddhist Studies 24: 1–19.


Furuyama, Ken’ichi. 2002. ‘Attakatā bunken ni arawareru “katikavatta”: shukke seikatsu niokeru jishukihan no shosō (On “katikavatta” in the Atthakathās: Aspects of Voluntary Rules in Monastic Life)’. Journal of Pali and Buddhist Studies 16: 59–69.


Hartmann, Jens-Uwe and Klaus Wille. 2014. ‘The Manuscript of the Dīrghāgama and the Private Collection in Virginia’. In From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research, edited by Paul Harrison and Jens-Uwe Hartmann, 137–155. Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, Denkschriften, 460. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.


Hu-von Hinüber, Haiyan. 1994. Das Poṣadhavastu: Vorschriften für die buddhistische Beichtfeier im Vinaya der Mūlasarvāstivādins. Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, Monographie 13. Reinbek: Wezler.


Kieffer-Pülz, Petra. 1992. Die Sīmā: Vorschriften zur Regelung der buddhistischen Gemeindegrenze in älteren Buddhistischen Texten. Monographien zur indischen Archäologie, Kunst und Philologie, 8. Berlin: D. Reimer.


Kitsudō, Masahiro. 1986. ‘Kairitsu bukkyō toshite no jyōza bukkyō no tokushitsu’. In Gendai suriranka no jyōza bukkyō (Contemporary Buddhism in Sri Lanka), edited by Egaku Maeda, 619–659. Tokyo: Sankibō Busshorin.


———. 1989. ‘Gendai suri ranka no butsudō to kairitsu — “katikāvataseitei no haikei (On Buddhist Teachings and Precepts in Modern Sri Lanka: The Background for Establishment of katikāvata)’. Nihon Bukkyō Gakkai Nenpō 54: 95–106.


Ratnapala, Nandasena. 1971. The Katikāvatas: Laws of the Buddhist Order of Ceylon from the 12th Century to the 18th Century. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, Beiheft N. München: Kitzinger.


Silk, Jonathan A. 2008. Managing Monks: Administrative Roles in Indian Buddhist Monasticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195326840.001.0001


Schopen, Gregory. 1996. ‘The Suppression of Nuns and the Ritual Murder of their Special Dead in Two Buddhist Monastic Texts’. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24: 563–592 = Schopen 2004: 329–359.


———. 2002. ‘Counting the Buddha and the Local Spirits in: A Monastic Ritual of Inclusion for the Rain Retreat’. Journal of Indian Philosophy 30(4): 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021174215900


———. 2004. Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still More Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.


Shōno, Masanori. 2009. ‘Bukkyō no shukkesha ga jyunshusubeki kriyākāra (On kriyākāras)’. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū) 58(1): 354–351.


Skilling, Peter. 2002. ‘Review of Vividharatnakaraṇḍaka: Festgabe für Adelheid Mette (Indica et Tibetica, 37), edited by Christine Chojnacki, Jens-Uwe Hartmann and Volker M. Tschannerl.’ Indo-Iranian Journal 45(4): 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1163/000000002124994874


von Hinüber, Oskar. 1985. ‘Die Bestimmung der Schulzugehörigkeit buddhistischer Texte nach sprachlichen Kriterien’. In Zur Schulzugehörigkeit von Werken der Hīnayāna-Liteteratur, Volume I, edited by Heinz Bechert, 57–75. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse,149 Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.


———. 1990. ‘Khandhakavatta: Loss of Text in the Pāli Vinayapiṭaka?’ Journal of Pali Text Society 15: 127–138.


———. 1995. ‘Buddhist Law According to the Theravāda-Vinaya: A Survey of Theory and Practice’. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 18(1): 7–45.


———. 1999. Das Pātimokkhasutta der Theravadin: Gestalt und seine Entstehungsgeschichte (Studien zur Literatur des Theravāda-Buddhismus, II), Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Jahrgang 1999, Nr. 6, Stuttgart: F. Steiner.


———. 2012. ‘Buddhistische Mönche als Verwalter ihrer Klöster: Die Entstehung des Begriffs “vārika” in der Tradition der Theravādins’. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 162(2): 373–389.


Yamagiwa, Nobuyuki. 2002. ‘Bikutati ga sadameta ritsukitei no yukue: upasena no innentan monogatari no seiritsu wo megutte (A Vinaya Rule Established by Monks: With Special Reference to the Story of Upasena)’. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū) 51(1): 358–353. https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.51.358


Yao, Fumi. 2007. ‘“Konpon setsuissaiu butoiu meishō nitsuite (On the Name “Mūlasarvāstivādin”)’. Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū (Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies) 55(2): 897–894. https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.55.897


Wynne, Alexander. 2008. ‘On the Sarvāstivādins and Mūlasarvāstivādins’. The Indian International Journal of Buddhist Studies 9: 243–266.