The positive effect of explicit positive evidence : Hebrew speakers unlearning null subjects in L2 English
Issue: Vol 2 No. 2 (2018) Special Issue: Second Language Teaching and Generative Linguistics
Journal: Instructed Second Language Acquisition
Subject Areas:
DOI: 10.1558/isla.35105
Abstract:
The study investigates questions central to the field of second language (L2) acquisition and instruction: Does the first language (L1) influence the L2 grammar? Can wrong patterns be restructured? Is Universal Grammar accessible during L2 acquisition? And can L2 acquisition, rather than learning (in Krashen's sense), be triggered by explicit positive evidence (EPE), combining input flood with explicit emphasis upon target forms? Three properties associated with the Null Subject Parameter were inspected in two sixth-grade groups (L1-Hebrew, L2-English): thematic subject omission, expletive subject omission, and post-verbal subjects. During teaching, both groups were exposed to input flood of expletive subjects, but only in one group were expletives explicitly emphasized (EPE). A Hebrew-to-English translation-choice task tested the abovementioned properties pre-teaching, immediately post-teaching, and four months post-teaching. Shortly after teaching, the group which was explicitly taught improved significantly in rejecting ungrammatical null expletives and post-verbal subjects, but not null thematic subjects, thus indicating (partial) clustering. However, the improvement attained was not fully preserved four months later. The results show that short-term exposure to EPE concerning a single property can apparently trigger change in another property, suggesting that learned knowledge can affect L2 competence, and that Universal Grammar plays a role in L2 acquisition.
Author: Noa Brandel
References :
Baker, M. (2008) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In Th. Biberauer (ed.) The Limits of Syntactic Variation 351–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.132.16bak
Balcom, P. and Bouffard, P. (2015) The effect of input flooding and explicit instruction on learning adverb placement in L3 French. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(2): 1–27.
Belletti, A., Bennati E. and Sorace, A. (2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9026-9
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990) The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3–49.
Bley-Vroman, R. (2009) The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 175–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090275
Borer, H. (1984) Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808506
Borer, H. (1989) Anaphoric AGR. In O. Jaeggli and K .J. Safir (eds) The Null Subject Parameter 69–109. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
CEFR. (2003) Relating Language Examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR): Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Manual: Pilot Preliminary Version, Strasburg: Language Policy Division.
Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, N. (2001) Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Language 1–52. MA: MIT Press.
Collins, L. and Muñoz, C. (2016) The foreign language classroom: current perspectives and future considerations. Modern Language Journal 100(1): 133–47. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/modl.12305/full; https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305
Flynn, S. and Martohardjono, G. (1994) Mapping from the initial state to the final state: the separation of universal principles and language-specific principles. In B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds) Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives, Volume 1, Heads, Projections and Learnability 319–35. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GarcÃa Mayo, M. P. (1998) The null subject parameter in adult second language acquisition. Atlantis 20(1): 47–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41055489
GarcÃa Mayo, M. P. (2017) Introduction. In M.P. GarcÃa Mayo (ed.) Learning Foreign Languages in Primary School: Research Insights xiii–xxiii. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. http://www.multilingual-matters.com/display.asp?K=9781783098101; https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1rfzxw1.5; https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1m320zq.7; https://doi.org/
10.1215/9780822373117-001; https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-350420170000021001; https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190655303.003.0001; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41366-2_1; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48734-2_1
Gil, K. H., Marsden, H. and Whong, M. (2013) Quantifiers: form and meaning in second language development. In M. Whong, K. H. Gil and H. Marsden (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom 139–59. Educational Linguistics (16). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_8
Gil, K. H., Marsden, H. and Whong, M. (2017) The meaning of negation in the second language classroom: evidence from ‘any’. Language Teaching Research 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817740144
Han, Z., Park, E. S. and Combs, C. (2008) Textual enhancement of input: issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics 29: 597–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn010
Harley, B. and Swain, M. (1984) The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In A. Davies, C. Criper and A. P. R. Howatt (eds) Interlanguage 291–311. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hawkins, R. and Chan, C. (1997) The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: the failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13(3): 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897671476153
Hazout, I. (1994). The Hebrew pronoun ze and the syntax of sentential subjects. Lingua 93: 265–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90359-X
Hirakawa, M., Shibuya, M. and Endo, M. (2018) Effects and non-effects of input enhancement in L2 English adjective ordering by Japanese speakers. Language Teaching Research 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752377
Hyams, N. (1986) Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4638-5
Isabelli, C. A. (2004) The acquisition of the null subject parameter properties in SLA: some effects of positive evidence in a naturalistic learning context. Hispania 87(1): 150–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20063017; https://doi.org/10.2307/20063017
Kayne, R. (2005) Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In G. Cinque and R. Kayne (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax 3–69. NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195136517.013.0001
Krashen, S. D. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.463.8762
Leal, T. and Slabakova, R. (2017) The relationship between L2 instruction, exposure, and the L2 acquisition of a syntax-discourse property in L2 Spanish. Language Teaching Research 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817745714
Liceras, J. M. (1988) Syntax and stylistics: more on the pro-drop parameter. In J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood-Smith and P. Van Buren (eds) Learnability and Second Languages 71–93. Dordrecht: Foris. http://artsites.uottawa.ca/jmliceras/doc/Liceras-_pro-drop_-1988-copy.pdf
Long, D. and Rothman, J. (2013) Generative approaches and the competing systems hypothesis: formal acquisition to practical application. In J. Schweiter (ed.) Theoretical and Pedagogical Innovations in SLA and Bilingualism 63–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.38.07lon
Long, M. (1991) Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. DeBot, R. B. Ginsberg and C. Kramsch (eds) Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective 39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
Lopez, E. (2017) Teaching the English article system: definiteness and specificity in linguistically-informed instruction. Language Teaching Research 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739649
Marcus, G. F. (1993) Negative evidence in language acquisition. Cognition 46: 53–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90022-N
Marsden, H. and Slabakova, R. (2018) Grammatical meaning and the second language classroom: introduction. Language Teaching Research 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752718
Marsden, H., Whong, M. and Gil, K. H. (2017) What’s in the textbook and what’s in the mind: polarity item ‘any’ in learner English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000018
Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50: 417–528. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0023-8333.00136/abstract; https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Prentza, A. (2010) Feature interpretability in second language acquisition: evidence from the null subject parameter in the Greek/English interlanguage. PhD dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. http://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/124425
Prentza, A. (2014) ‘Subject, subject, where are you?’ Unlearning L1 null subjects in L2-English: is there a way? ICT for Language Learning Conference Proceedings (7th edn) 547–51. Padova: Pixel Print.https://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL/files/ict4ll/ed0007/FP/1150-SLA722-FP-ICT4LL7.pdf
Reinhart, T. and Siloni, T. (2004) Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou and M. Everaert (eds) The Unaccusativity Puzzle 288–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0007
Rizzi, L. (1982) Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883718
Roberts, I. and Holmberg, A. (2010) Introduction: parameters in minimalist theory. In Th. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan (eds) Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory 1–57. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770784.001
Rothman, J. (2008) Aspect selection in adult L2 Spanish and the competing systems hypothesis: when pedagogical and linguistic rules conflict. Languages in Contrast 8: 74–106. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.8.1.05rot
Rothman, J. (2010) Theoretical linguistics meets pedagogical practice: pronominal subject use in Spanish as a second language as an example. Hispania 93(1): 52–65. https://web.stanford.edu/class/linguist1/Rdgs/rothman.pdf
Rothman, J. and Iverson, M. (2007a) The syntax of null subjects in L2-Spanish: comparing two L2 populations under different exposure. Revista Española de LingüÃstica Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics (RESLA) 20: 185–214. http://
connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/31810939/syntax-null-subjects-l2-spanish-
comparing-two-l2-populations-under-different-exposure
Rothman, J. and Iverson, M. (2007b) On parameter clustering and resetting the null-subject parameter in L2 Spanish: implications and observations. Hispania 90(2): 328–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20063519
Rothman, J. and Iverson, M. (2007c) Input type and parameter resetting: is naturalistic input necessary? International Review of Applied Linguistics, IRAL 45(4): 285–319. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2007.013
Schmidt, R. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2): 129–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Schwartz, B. D. (1993) On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011931
Schwartz, B. D. and Gubala-Ryzak, M. (1992) Learnability and grammar reorganization in L2A: against negative evidence causing the unlearning of verb movement. Second Language Research 8: 1–38. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/
026765839200800102; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011931
Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R. A. (1996) L2 cognitive states and full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/
026765839601200103
Schwartz, B. D. and Sprouse, R. A. (2000) When syntactic theories evolve: consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (ed.) Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory 156–86. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shlonsky, U. (2009) Hebrew as a partial null-subject language. Studia Linguistica 63(1): 133–57. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01156.x/abstract; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01156.x
Shook, D. J. (1994) Reading, grammatical information, and the input-to-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning 5: 57–93. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ508428
Slabakova, R. (2016) Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Snape, N. and Yusa, N. (2013) Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity, and perception. In M. Whong, K. H. Gil and H. Marsden (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom 161–83. Educational Linguistics (16). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_9
Spada, N. and Tomita, Y. (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: a meta-analysis. Language Learning 60: 263–308. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x/abstract; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x
Tsimpli, I. M. and Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007) The interpretability hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23: 215–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307076546
Umeda, M., Snape, N., Wiltshier, J. and Yusa, N. (2017) The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Language Teaching Research 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739648
Vainikka, A. and Levy, Y. (1999) Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 613–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006225032592
Vainikka, A. and Young-Scholten, M. (1994) Direct access to X’-theory: evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds) Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar 265–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.13vai
VanPatten, B. (1990) Attending to form and content in the input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009177
VanPatten, B. (2010) Some verbs are more perfect than others: why learners have difficulty with ser and estar and what it means for instruction. Hispania 93(1): 29–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25703391
VanPatten, B. and Smith, M. (2015) Aptitude as grammatical sensitivity and the initial stages of learning Japanese as an L2: parametric variation and case marking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37: 135–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000345
White, L. (1986) Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the pro-drop parameter. In V. J. Cook (ed.) Experimental Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 55–72.
White, L. (1989) Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.1
White, L. (1991) Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7: 133–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700205
White, L. (2003) Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065
Whong, M. (2011) Language Teaching: Linguistic Theory in Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Whong, M., Gil, K. H. and Marsden, H. (2013) Introduction: generative second language acquisition and language pedagogy. In M. Whong, K. H. Gil and H. Marsden (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom 1–13. Educational Linguistics (16). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_1
Williams, J. and Evans, J. (1998) What kind of focus on which forms. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 139–55. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, W. (2005) Input Enhancement: From Theory and Research to the Classroom. NY: McGraw Hill.