The DUT task: A novel experimental paradigm to investigate the variability of eye movements in whole-text reading for meaning
Issue: Vol 4 No. 2 (2017)
Subject Areas: Linguistics
This article reports on the development of a novel experimental paradigm for the investigation of the statistical properties of eye movements in whole-text reading, with a focus on variability. Eye movements in reading for meaning were compared to eye movements in proofreading without comprehending, using texts as stimuli that were deemed to be difficult and uninteresting to participants, and hence to effectively preclude reading for meaning in the proofreading condition. Using a linear mixed model for a 4-way ANOVA, variability of total fixation durations and number of fixations was found to be significantly different between conditions, but only for one of the two texts in one of the two designs. This suggests that there may be a correlation between reading proficiency and variability of eye movements, but also that in order to determine this correlation, stimulus texts must be precisely tailored to the participant population.
Author: Tobias Alf Kroll, A. Alexandre Trindade, Amber Asikis, Melissa Salas, Marcy Lau, Chelsey Saenz, Madison Head, Chalani Prematilake, Carolyn Perry
Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Brown, J., Kim, K., and O‘Brien Ramirez, K. (2012). What a teacher hears, what a reader sees: Eye movements from a phonics taught second grader. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 12: 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411417081
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 30: 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076829
Damico, J. S. and Ball, M. J. (2010). Prolegomenon: Addressing the tyranny of old ideas. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 1 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v1i1.1
Damico, J. S. and Nelson, R. L. (2010). Reading and reading impairments. In J. S. Damico, N. Müller, and M. J. Ball (Eds) The Handbook of Speech and Language Disorders, 267–295. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318975.ch12
Duckett, P. d. B. (2003). Envisioning story: The eye movements of beginning readers. Literacy Teaching and Learning 7: 77–89.
Fulcher, G. (1997). Text difficulty and accessibility: Reading formulae and expert judgement. System 25: 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00048-1
Goldberger, A. L. (2006). Complex systems. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society 3: 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200603-028MS
Goldberger, A. L., Moody, G. B., and Costa, M. D. (2012). Variability vs. complexity. Retrieved on 5 March 2016 from https://physionet.org/tutorials/cv/#11-variable-
Goodman, K. S. (1994). Reading, writing, and written texts: A transactional sociopsycholinguistic view. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H. Singer (Eds) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (4th ed.), 1093–1130. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., and Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi and J. Oakhill (Eds), Reading Comprehension Difficulties: Processes and Intervention, 1–13. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Henderson, J. M. and Luke, S. G. (2014). Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 1390–1400.
Lehmann, E. L. (2006). Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. New York: Springer.
Li, X., Rayner, K., Williams, C. C., Cave, K. R., and Well, A. D. (2007). Eye movements and individual differences. Visual Cognition 15: 105–108.
Nelson, N. (2010). Language and Literacy Disorders: Infancy Through Adolescence. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Noë, A. (2015). Peering into Rembrandt’s eyes. Retrieved on 6 September 2015 from
RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for Understanding. Toward and R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 1457–1506.
Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E., Potter, M. C., and Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 17: 4–34.
Schotter, E. R., Bicknell, K., Howard, I., Levy, R., and Rayner, K. (2014). Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading. Cognition 131: 1–27.
Smith, F. (2004). Understanding Reading. A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read (6th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tobii AB (2010). Tobii Studio 2.X Software Release 2.2 Manual. Falls Church, VA: Tobii Technology AB.
Traxler, M. J., Johns, C. L., Long, D. L., Zirnstein, M., Tooley, K. M., and Jonathan, E. (2012). Individual differences in eye-movements during reading: Working memory and speed-of-processing effects. Journal of Eye Movement Research 5: 1–16.
Underwood, G, Hubbard, A., and Wilkinson, H. (1990). Eye fixations predict reading comprehension: The relationships between reading skill, reading speed, and visual inspection. Language and Speech 33: 69–81.