Investigating the complexity of consent forms in ESL research
Issue: Vol 4 No. 2 (2017)
Subject Areas: Linguistics
Consent forms tell potential participants what to expect when joining a research project and are considered critical documents to the research process. However, there has been limited investigation into how to properly create a usable consent form for ESL learners. Most of our current knowledge on the topic comes from various governmental mandates, rules of thumb, or from fields outside of linguistics or TESOL research. This paper details an investigation looking into the practices of consent form writing in 40 published ESL-based dissertations. Findings show that the average consent form was around 2.38 pages long and written above the 11th grade level. Additionally, vocabulary from the forms included a large representation of infrequent words that might not be known by ESL participants. Consent forms written for ESL participants appear to be highly complex documents with their difficulty unlikely to provide truly informed consent. A troubling finding since these researchers could be considered experts in understanding ESL learner needs.
Author: Scott Sterling
De Costa, P. (Ed.). (2015). Ethics and Applied Linguistics Research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource. New York: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fox, J., Artemeva, N., Darville, R., and Woods, D. (2006). Juggling through hoops: Implementing ethics policies in applied language studies. Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1–4), 77–99.
Gass, S. and Sterling, S. (2017). Ethics in ISLA. In S. Loewen and M. Sato (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 577–595. New York: Routledge.
Joffe, S., Cook, E. F., Cleary, P. D., Clark, J. W., and Weeks, J. C. (2001). Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93 (2), 139–147.
Kincaid, J., Jr, R. F., Rogers, R., and Chissom, B. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch.
Loewen, S., Lavolette, E., Spino, L. A., Papi, M., Schmidtke, J., Sterling, S., and Wolff, D. (2014). Statistical literacy among applied linguists and second language acquisition researchers. TESOL Quarterly 48 (2).
Mackey, A. and Gass, S. (2015). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahboob, A., Paltridge, B., Phakiti, A., Wagner, E., Starfield, S., Burns, A., Jones, R., De Costa, P. (2016). TESOL Quarterly Research Guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 50(1), 42–65. http://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.288
McCabe, M., Morgan, F., Curley, H., Begay, R., and Gohdes, D. D. M. (2005). The informed consent process in a cross-cultural setting: Is the process achieving the intended result. Ethnicity and Disease 15, 300–304.
Miller, C., O’Donnell, D., Searight, R., and Barbarash, R. (1996). The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: An assessment tool for clinical research subjects. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy 16 (5), 872–878.
Newton, K. and Sterling, S. (2017). Medical consent form complexity for nonnative English-speaking patients. Paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL). Portland, Oregon, USA.
Ngo, B., Bigelow, M., and Lee, S. J. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: What does it mean to do ethical and engaged research with immigrant communities? Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 8 (1), 1–6.
Ortega, L. and Zyzik, E. (2008). Online interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2 researchers. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating Discourse Online, 331–357. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Taylor, H. A., and Brancati, F. L. (2003). Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. The New England Journal of Medicine 348 (8), 721–726.
Plonsky, L., Egbert, J., and Laflair, G. T. (2015). Bootstrapping in Applied Linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data. Applied Linguistics 36 (5), 591–610.
Plonsky, L. and Ziegler, N. (2016). The CALL – SLA interface : Insights from a second-order synthesis. Language Learning and Technology 20 (2), 17–37.
Polio, C. and Gass, S. (1997). Replication and reporting. Studies in Art Education 19 (4), 499–508.
Porte, G. (2012). Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, G. A., Hougham, G. W., Sugarman, J., Agre, P., Marion, E., Geller, G., … Mintz, J. I. M. (2003). Conducting empirical research on informed consent: Challenges and questions. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 25 (5), 4–10.
Schenker, Y., Wang, F., Selig, S. J., Ng, R., and Fernandez, A. (2007). The impact of language barriers on documentation of informed consent at a hospital with on-site interpreter services. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22 (2), 294–299.
Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., and Schmitt, D. (2015). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland and Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching 50 (2), 212–226.
Steneck, N. (2004). ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2004. Rockville, MD: ORI.
Sterling, S. (2015). Informed Consent Forms in ESL Research: Form Difficulty and Comprehension. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Sterling, S., Winke, P., and Gass, S. (2016). Training in research ethics among applied linguistics and SLA researchers. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in Applied Linguistics Research: Language Researcher Narratives, 15–37. New York: Routledge.
Stunkel, L., Benson, M., McLellan, L., Sinaii, N., Bedarida, G., Emanuel, E., and Grady, C. (2010). Comprehension and informed consent: Assessing the effect of a short consent form. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 32 (4), 1–9.
TESOL Research Committee. (1980). Guidelines for ethical research in ESL. TESOL Quarterly 14 (3), 383–388.
Yeager-Woodhouse, D. and Sivell, J. (2006). Prepackaged tour versus personal journey: The meaning of informed consent in the context of the teacher-study group. Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1), 189–203.