Item Details

Paths of Monastic Practice from India to Sri Lanka: Responses to L.S. Cousins’ Work on Scholars and Meditators

Issue: Vol 35 No. 1-2 (2018) Special Issue: Buddhist Path, Buddhist Teachings: Studies in Memory of L.S. Cousins

Journal: Buddhist Studies Review

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies

DOI: 10.1558/bsrv.36751

Abstract:

In 1996, L. S Cousins published a groundbreaking piece on paths of monastic practice titled ‘Scholar Monks and Meditator Monks Revisited’ (Powers and Prebish 2009, 31–46). As the title suggests, this work reconsiders the role of two types of monks, doing so by closely analyzing a famous sutta (Mahācunda Sutta, A III 355–356) that depicts a strong dispute between jhāyins or ‘meditators’ and dhammayogas, whom scholarship has almost universally defined as ‘scholars’. Because of this, almost all have interpreted this debate as the first sign in early Indian Buddhism of a great bifurcation in the saṅgha between those concentrating on book learning (pariyatti) and those concentrating on practice (paṭipatti) — a split that became more and more marked over the centuries until the division became more or less official in medieval Sri Lanka. Cousins convincingly contests this history, with one of his main points being that the dhammayogas were not at all just scholars. Like the meditators, theirs was a practical path that resulted in profound realization of the Dhamma, albeit a different path from that of the meditators. Cousins then goes even further, arguing that the split between scholars and meditators is not very evident in South Asian Buddhist history until the time of Buddhaghosa and thereafter. My intention here is to respond as fully as possible to Cousins’ methods and conclusions, by offering evidence and arguments that sometimes support his work further and sometimes critique his work. This is done in the spirit of spurring on more discussions on this important, complex, and contested issue.

Author: Bradley S. Clough

View Original Web Page

References :

Bareau, Andre. 1963. Recherches sur la Biographie du Buddha dans les Sūtrapiṭaka et les Vinayapiṭaka Anciens. Paris: Publications de l’Ecole Francais d’Extreme-Orient.

Bodhi, Bhikkhu. 2003. ‘Musīla and Nārada Revisited: Seeking the Key to Interpretation’. In Approaching the Dhamma: Buddhist Texts and Practices in South and Southeast Asia, edited by Anne M. Blackburn and Jeffrey Samuels, 47–68. Seattle: Pariyatti Editions.

———. 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya. Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications.

Buswell, Robert and Robert Gimello, eds. 1992. Paths to Liberation: The Mārga and Its Transformations in Buddhist Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Clough, Bradley S. 2012. Early Indian and Theravāda Buddhism: Soteriological Controversy and Diversity. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.

Collins, Steven. 1990. ‘On the Very Idea of the Pāli Canon’. Journal of the Pāli Text Society XV: 89–126.

Cousins, L.S. 1973. ‘Buddhist Jhāna: Its Nature and Attainment According to the Pali Sources’. Religion 3: 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(73)90003-1

———. 1984. ‘Samatha-yāna and Vipassanā-yāna’. In Buddhist Studies in Honor of Hammalava Saddhatissa, edited by Gatare Dhammapala, Richard Gombrich and K. R. Norman, 56–68. Nugegoda, Sri Lanka: University of Sri Jayewardenpura.

———. 1996. ‘The Origins of Insight Meditation’. In The Buddhist Forum Vol. IV, edited by Tadeusz Skorupski, 35–58. New Delhi: Heritage Publishers.

———. 2009. ‘Scholar Monks and Meditator Monks Revisted’. In Destroying Māra Forever: Buddhist Ethics Essays in Honor of Damien Keown, edited by John Powers and Charles S. Prebish, 31–46. Ithaca, NY: Snow Lion Publications.

Deegalle, Mahinda. 2006. Popularizing Buddhism: Preaching as Performance in Sri Lanka. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Fauré, Bernard. 1994. Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Finot, Louis. 1901. Rāṣṭrapālaparipṛcchā. Saint Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences.

Frauwallner, E. 1956. The Earliest Vinaya and the Beginnings of Buddhist Literature. Rome: ISMEO.

Gombrich, Richard. 1988. Theravāda Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Banares to Modern Colombo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203310878

———. 1990. ‘Recovering the Buddha’s Message’. In The Buddhist Forum, edited by Tadeusz Skorupski, 5–20. London: SOAS.

———. 1997. How Buddhism Began: The Conditioned Genesis of the Early Teachings. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.

Griffiths, Paul. 1981. ’Concentration or Insight: The Problematic of Thervāda Buddhist Meditation-Theory’. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 49(4): 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/XLIX.4.605

Hallisey, Charles. 1990. ‘Apropos the Pāli Vinaya as a Historical Document’. Journal of the Pali Text Society XV: 197–208.

———. 1995. ‘Roads Taken and Not Taken in the Study of Theravāda Buddhism’. In Curators of the Buddha: The Study of Buddhism Under Colonialism, edited by Donald Lopez, 31–61. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Harvey, Peter. 2013. ‘The Sagha of the Noble Sāvakas, with Particular Reference to Their Trainee Member, the Person “Practising for the Realization of the Stream-entry-fruit”’. Buddhist Studies Review 30(1): 3–70. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v30i1.3

Heine, Steven. 1995. Dōgen and the Koan Tradition: A Tale of Two Shobogenzo Texts. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lamotte, Etienne. 1958. Histoire du Bouddhisme Indien des Origines a l’ere Saka. Louvain: Publications Universitaires, Bibliotheque Du Museon.

Ray, Reginald A. 1994. Buddhist Saints in India: A Study in Buddhist Values and Orientations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schopen, Gregory. 1997. Bones, Stones and Buddhist Monks: Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Wynne, Alexander. 2002. ‘An Interpretation of Released on Both Sides (ubhāto-bhāga-vimutti) and the Ramifications for the Study of Early Buddhism’. Buddhist Studies Review 19(1): 31–40.

———. 2007. The Origin of Buddhist Meditation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963005