Item Details

Silence, Secrecy and Power: Understanding the Royal Commission Findings into the Failure of Religious Organisations to Protect Children

Issue: Vol 31 No. 3 (2018) Special Issue: Religion at the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse

Journal: Journal for the Academic Study of Religion

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies

DOI: 10.1558/jasr.37306

Abstract:

Religious groups represented over 60% of all institutions appearing before the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. This indicates that there are specific issues pertinent to the institutional cultures and structures of religious groups with regard to the sexual abuse of children. This warrants close investigation and analysis by scholars of religion. The article provides the background and context to the establishment of the Royal Commission, and an overview of the Commission's methodology and its investigation into religious organisations, as well as an analysis of the outcomes of that investigation via the Final Report. The report includes 57 specific recommendations for religious institutions, which, when closely considered, will constitute formidable challenges for faith traditions in transforming institutional culture while conforming to child safety standards. It is argued that the success of the Royal Commission is due to a multiplicity of factors including the outcomes of previous inquiries, the improved status of survivor testimony, and the innovative methodology employed to investigate organisations.

Author: Kathleen McPhillips

View Original Web Page

References :

—2018. ‘Soul Murder’: Investigating Spiritual Trauma at the Royal Commission. Journal of Australian Studies 42(2): 231–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2018.1458329

—2017a. Case Study 22. Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-studies/case-study-22-yeshiva-bondi-and-yeshivah-melbourne

—2017b. Final Report. Preface & Executive Summary Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/preface-and-executive-summary

—2017c. Final Report, Vol. 1. Our Inquiry Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/our-inquiry

—2017d. Final Report, Vol. 3. Impacts Commonwealth of Australia.

—2017e. Final Report, Vol. 5. Private Sessions Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report-private-sessions

—2017f. Final Report, Vol. 16: Book 1. Religious Institutions Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/religious-institutions

—2017g. Final Report, Vol. 16, Book 2. Religious Institutions Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/religious-institutions

—2017h. Final Report, Vol. 16, Book 3. Religious Institutions Commonwealth of Australia. https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/religious-institutions

—2018. Abuse and Cruelty in Religious Bureaucracy: The Case of the Anglican Diocese of Newcastle. Journal of Australian Studies 42(2): 243–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2018.1459782

—2018. Institutional Abuse: A Long History. Journal of Australian Studies 42(2): 153–63.

—2018. Zero Tolerance? The Facts Don’t Support the Pope’s Claims on Child Abuse. The Guardian, January 31. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/31/zero-tolerance-the-facts-dont-support-the-popes-claims-on-child-abuse.

—2019. Civil and Canon Law on Reporting Child Sexual Abuse to the Civil Authorities. Journal for the Academic Study of Religion 31(3): 143–64.

—2018. Challenging Institutional Denial: Psychological Discourse, Therapeutic Culture and Public Inquiries. Journal of Australian Studies 42(2): 177–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2018.1462237