Item Details

Implicit Beliefs, Explicit Practices? How International Human Rights Law Manages Religion

Issue: Vol 21 No. 3 (2018) Religion in Law: Interdisciplinary perspectives

Journal: Implicit Religion

Subject Areas: Religious Studies

DOI: 10.1558/imre.37955

Abstract:

In this article, I discuss how international human rights law (IHRL) interacts with the notions of "implicit" and "lived" religion. More specifically, I examine the capability of Article 9 on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to provide protection for rights claims that derive from "implicit" and "lived" forms of religion. I develop this argument in three steps: First, I provide a working definition of "implicit" and "lived" religion. Second, I assess the provisions on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the ECHR, asking what kinds of "religion" are most likely to gain protections under this instrument. Third, I review some recent cases to come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which monitors the ECHR, gauging which forms of religion have been recognized by the court.

Author: Helge Årsheim

View Original Web Page

References :

Agrama, Hussein Ali. 2010. “Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State?” Comparative Studies in Society and History 52(3): 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417510000289

Ammerman, Nancy T. 2016. “Lived Religion as an Emerging Field: An Assessment of Its Contours and Frontiers.” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 29(2): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2016-02-01

Årsheim, Helge and Pamela Slotte. 2017. “The Juridification of Religion?” Brill Research Perspectives on Law and Religion 1(2): 189. https://doi.org/10.1163/24682993-12340002

Bailey, Edward. 1990. “The Implicit Religion of Contemporary Society: Some Studies and Reflections.” Social Compass 37(4): 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776890037004006

———. 2009. “Implicit Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by Peter B. Clarke, 801–815. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279791.003.0045

Beaman, Lori. 2012. “Is Religious Freedom Impossible in Canada?” Law, Culture and the Humanities 8(2): 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872110366653

Bhuta, N. 2014. “Two Concepts of Religious Freedom in the European Court of Human Rights.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (1): 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2390410

Danchin, Peter G. 2011. “Islam in the Secular Nomos of the European Court of Human Rights.” Michigan Journal of International Law 32: 663–747.

Davis, Murray S. 1986. “‘That’s Classic!’ The Phenomenology and Rhetoric of Successful Social Theories.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16(3): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318601600301

Dressler, Markus. 2008. “Religio-Secular Metamorphoses: The Re-Making of Turkish Alevism.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (2): 280–311.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfn033

Gorski, Philip S. 2000. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe ca. 1300 to 1700.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 138–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657295

Gorski, Philip S. and Ateş Altınordu. 2008. “After Secularization?” Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134740

Hanson, Sharon. 2007. “The Sacred Paradox of English Law.” Implicit Religion 10(1): 8–37.

Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.12754

Itzcovich, G. 2013. “One, None and One Hundred Thousand Margins of Appreciations: The Lautsi Case.” Human Rights Law Review 13(2): 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs038

Martínez-Torrón, Javier. 2018. “Strasbourg’ s Approach to Religion in the Pluralist Democracies of Europe.” In Magna Carta, Religion and the Rule of Law, edited by R. Griffith-Jones and M. Hill, 281–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178164.017

McIvor, Méadhbh. 2015. “Carnal Exhibitions: Material Religion and the European Court of Human Rights.” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 17(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x14000866

Pelkmans, Mathijs. 2014. “Paradoxes of Religious Freedom and Repression in (Post-) Soviet Contexts.” Journal of Law and Religion 29 (3): 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2014.23

Su, Anna. 2016. “Judging Religious Sincerity.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 5(1): 28–48.

Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. 2005. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700101805

Taylor, Paul M. 2005. Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.