Scriptures, Materiality, and the Digital Turn: The Iconicity of Sacred Texts in a Liminal Age
The “digital turn” witnessed over the past several decades has had a significant impact on the use of sacred texts, although the full extent of these developments is far from settled. This essay explores some of the social and cultural dynamics involved in converting or translating scriptures to digital formats, issues which take on heightened significance because of the sacred status of these texts in their respective traditions. Drawing on the notion of diverse functional dimensions of scriptures, this study highlights the complex way in which the use of sacred texts in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam is being affected by the digital turn. Specific focus is placed on the iconic role of scriptures, an aspect often bound up with issues of materiality. I conclude with some theoretical reflections that build on Jonathan Westin’s “vocabulary of limitations,” which itself draws on the sociology of translation, to suggest that the material dimensions of scriptures in this liminal age highlights the role of these texts as objects which both embody and contribute to social and cultural values. These comparative perspectives offer suggestive possibilities for reflection on such material texts as “sacred beings.”
Author: Bradford A. Anderson
Bell, Catherine. 1992. Ritual Theory and Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bielo, James S. 2009. Words Upon the Word: An Ethnography of Evangelical Group Bible Study. Qualitative Studies in Religion. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298100390040603
Cantwell Smith, Wilfred. 1993. What Is Scripture? A Comparative Approach. London: SCM.
Clivaz, Claire, Paul Dilley, and David Hamidović, eds. 2016. Ancient Worlds in Digital Culture. Digital Biblical Studies 1. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.21071/mijtk.v0i3.10782
Connolly, William E. 2011. A World of Becoming. Durham: Duke University Press.
Graham, William A. 1987. Beyond the Written Word: Oral Aspects of Scripture in the History of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillerbrand, Hans J. 2006. “On Book Burnings and Book Burners: Reflections on the Power (and Powerlessness) of Ideas.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74: 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj117
Hoskins, Janet. 2006. “Agency, Biography, and Objects.” In Handbook of Material Culture, edited by Christopher Tilley, Webb Keane, Susanne Kuchler, Micheal Rowlands, and Patricia Spyder, 74–84. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949460701424395
Hutchings, Tim. 2015. “E-Reading and the Christian Bible.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 44: 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429815610607
———. 2017. “Design and the Digital Bible: Persuasive Technology and Religious Reading.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 32: 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2017.1298903
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 1994. “On Technical Mediation.” Common Knowledge 3(2): 29–64.
———. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Malley, Brian. 2004. How the Bible Works: An Anthropological Study of Evangelical Biblicism. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira. https://doi.org/
McGann, Jerome. 2014. A New Republic of Letters: Memory and Scholarship in the Age of Digital Reproduction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Najafizada, Enayat, and Rod Nordland. 2011. “Afghans Avenge Florida Koran Burning, Killing 12.” The New York Times. 1 April. http://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/2011/04/02/world/asia/02afghanistan.html
Parker, David. 2003. “Through a Screen Darkly: Digital Texts and the New Testament.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 25: 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064x0302500401
Parmenter, Dorina Miller. 2006 . “The Iconic Book: The Image of the Bible in Early Christian Rituals.” Postscripts 2 (2–3): 160–189. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.v2i2.160
———. 2012 . “How the Bible Feels: The Christian Bible as Effective and Affective Object.” Postscripts 8(1–2): 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1558/post.32589
Preda, Alex. 1999. “The Turn to Things: Arguments for a Sociological Theory of Things.” The Sociological Quarterly 40: 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00552.x
Rubin, Alissa J., and Graham Bowley. 2012. “Koran Burning in Afghanistan Prompts 3 Parallel Inquiries.” The New York Times. 29 February. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/01/world/asia/koran-burning-in-afghanistan-prompts-3-parallel-inquiries.html
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1987. To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0360966900040421
Watts, James W. 2006 . “The Three Dimensions of Scriptures.” Postscripts 2(2–3): 135–159.
———. 2010. “Disposing of Non-Disposable Texts.” In The Death of Sacred Texts: Ritual Disposal and Renovation of Texts in the World Religions, edited by Kristina Myrvold, 147–159. Farnham: Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315615318
Westin, Jonathan. 2012. “Loss of Culture: New Media Forms and the Translation from Analogue to Digital Books.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 19(2): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512452398