Item Details

Drawing on the Board

Issue: Vol 38 No. 1-2 (2019) Special Issue: Festschrift for Michel Desjardins

Journal: Religious Studies and Theology

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies

DOI: 10.1558/rsth.38285

Abstract:

Students and teachers alike tend to think of drawing on the board as an old-fashioned teaching technology, and to prefer electronically mediated pedagogies even in the face-to-face classroom. In this article, I celebrate the chalkboard and whiteboard as potential sites of collaborative and open-ended teaching and learning. Arguing that technological choices are always also political choices, I suggest that the problematizing, slow-paced, and inconclusive teaching style encouraged by board-work is a style worth fighting for - especially in the Religious Studies classroom.

Author: Michael Ostling

View Original Web Page

References :

Alonso, María A. Pérez. 2015. “Metacognition and Sensorimotor Components Underlying the Process of Handwriting and Keyboarding and Their

Impact on Learning. An Analysis from the Perspective of Embodied Psychology.” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 176: 263–269.

Barany, Michael J. and Donald MacKenzie. 2014. “Chalk: Materials and concepts in Mathematics Research.” In Representation in scientific practice revisited, edited by Catelijne Coopmans, Janet Vertesi, Michael E. Lynch, and Steve Woolgar, 107–129. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201601792

Bulbulia, Joseph. 2005. “Are there any religions?.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 17(2):71–100.

Carr, Nicholas. 2014. The Glass Cage: How Our Computers are Changing Us. New York: Norton.

Daniel, David B. and Daniel T. Willingham. 2012. “Electronic textbooks: Why the rush?” Science 335(6076): 1569–1571. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.335.6076.1569

Delbanco, Andrew. 2012. College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Franklin, Ursula. 1999. The real world of technology. Second edition. Toronto: Anansi.

Freire, Paolo. 2013 [1974]. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury.

Gleick, James. 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin.

Herzig, Tamar. 2016. “Fear and devotion in the writings of Heinrich Institoris.” In Emotions in the History of Witchcraft, edited by Laura Kounine and Michael Ostling, 19–36. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52903-9_2

Lipner, Julius J. 2006. “The rise of ‘Hinduism’; or, how to invent a world religion with only moderate success.” Hindu Studies 10: 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-006-9004-6

Mueller, Pam A. and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2014. “The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking.” Psychological Science 25(6): 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

Nüssli, Christos. 2010. “Periodis Web: A Historical Atlas and Gazetteer of Europe from Year 1 to 2000.” Euratlas. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598
x0006868x

Perez-Hernandez, Danya. 2014. “Taking notes by hand benefits recall, researchers find.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle
.com/blogs/wiredcampus/taking-notes-by-hand-benefits-recall-researchers-find/51411

Religion Facts. 2016. “The Big Religion Chart.” http://www.religionfacts.com/big-religion-chart

Sax, David. 2016. “The Analog Spaces in Digital Companies.” The New Yorker.
https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-analog-spaces-in-
digital-companies

Smith, Jonathan Z. 2013. On Teaching Religion: Essays by Jonathan Z. Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.