References :

Barrett, Justin L. 1999. ‘Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion’, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11: 325-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/157006899X00078.

Bering, Jesse. 2002. ‘Intuitive Conceptions of Dead Agents’ Minds: The Natural Foundations of Afterlife Beliefs as Phenomenological Boundary’, Journal of Cognition and Culture 2: 263-308. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685370260441008.

Boyer, Pascal. 2000. ‘Functional Origins of Religious Concepts: Ontological and Strategic Selection in Evolved Minds’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6: 195-214. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00012.

Kelemen, Deborah. 1999. ‘The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children’, Cognition 70: 241-72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00010-4.

Leech, David, and Aku Visala. 2011. ‘The Cognitive Science of Religion: Implications for Theism?’, Zygon 46: 47-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2010.01157.x.

Lindeman, Marjaana, Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, and Jari Lipsanen. 2015. ‘Ontological Confusions but Not Mentalizing Abilities Predict Religious Belief, Paranormal Belief, and Belief in Supernatural Purpose’, Cognition 134: 63-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.008.

Salmon, Wesley. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

Van Inwagen, Peter. 2009. ‘Explaining Belief in the Supernatural: Some Thoughts on Paul Bloom’s "Religious Belief as Evolutionary Accident",’ in J. Schloss and M. J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate : Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion (New York: Oxford University Press): 128-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557028.003.0007.