Balancing Dichotomies, Opening Conversations: A Reflection on Michel Desjardins’ Contribution to the Study of Religion in the Classroom and Beyond
Issue: Vol 38 No. 1-2 (2019) Special Issue: Festschrift for Michel Desjardins
Journal: Religious Studies and Theology
Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies
DOI: 10.1558/rsth.38708
Abstract:
Having known Michel since the first stages of his career, when he was engaged in the study of early Christianity, I have seen him exemplify the role of teacher-scholar for those of us who have attempted to follow in his footsteps. His approach has been to empower students by creating conversations, to balance opposing positions and to allow students to come to their own conclusions (rather than arriving at the “right answer”). This approach not only occurs in the classroom, but also within the academy. Indeed, I propose that Michel’s role as a researcher is largely an extension of his role as a teacher, or co-learner. In this paper, I explore some of the pedagogical implications and lessons that I have learned from Michel’s example as a teacher-scholar. Specifically, I discuss attachment theory, student empowerment, and collaborative pedagogy.
Author: Philip L. Tite
References :
Ainsworth, Mary. 1969. “Object Relations, Dependency, and Attachment: A Theoretical Review of the Infant-Mother Relationship.” Child Development 40(4): 969–1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127008
———. 1985. “Attachments Across the Life Span.” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 61(9): 792–812.
Bowlby, John. 1969. Attachment and Loss. Volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
———. 1973. Attachment and Loss. Volume 2: Separation, Anxiety, and Anger. New York: Basic Books.
———. 1980. Attachment and Loss. Volume 3: Loss. New York: Basic Books.
Bretherton, Inge. 1992. “The Origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth.” Developmental Psychology 28(5): 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.28.5.759
Desjardins, Michel. 1985. “Law in 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch.” Studies in Religion/Sciences religieuses 14(1): 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/000842988501400104
———. 1986. “The Sources for Valentinian Gnosticism: A Question of Methodology.” Vigiliae Christianae 40(4): 342–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/1584034
———. 1987. “The Portrayal of the Dissidents in 2 Peter and Jude.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 9(30): 89–102.
———. 1990. Sin in Valentinianism. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series, 108. Atlanta, GA: Scholars.
———. 1991a. “Bauer and Beyond: The Scholarly Discussion of hairesis in the Early Christian Era.” Second Century 8(2): 65–82.
———. 1991b. “The New Testament Canon and the Modern Mind.” Paper presented at the 1991 Christianity and Culture Symposium, St. Michael’s College, Toronto, Ontario, October 8.
———. 1992. “Where was the Gospel of Thomas Written?” Toronto Journal of Theology 8(1): 121–133.