Ektoplazm.com: Psychedelic trance, internet curation and free music distribution
Issue: Vol 13 No. 1-2 (2020) Special Issue: Popular Music and Curation
Journal: Popular Music History
Subject Areas: Popular Music
DOI: 10.1558/pomh.39424
Abstract:
This article looks at the website Ektoplazm.com, which acts as a free distribution service for psychedelic trance music. Ektoplazm is maintained by a single webmaster, DJ Basilisk, who describes the service as a ‘curated collection’ of music. Basilisk maintains strict aesthetic and technical standards for every item uploaded, helping to create an attractive musical commodity with valuable attributes—albeit one that is offered free of charge. With Ektoplazm as its focal point, this article examines the interaction between curator, community and commodity in the digital era. Here, curation is found to be part of a wider process of reintermediation which adds value to digital music. The stylistic, aesthetic, technical and legal components of Basilisk’s curatorial role are considered, and Ektoplazm is placed in the context of psytrance’s cultural history, the changing landscape of internet music websites and the free-culture movement.
Author: Christopher David Charles
References :
Aittoniemi, Toni., 2012. ‘Cultural and Musical Dimensions of Goa Trance and Early Psychedelic Trance in Finland’. M.A. diss., University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/34536
Anderson, Chris. 2006. The Long Tail: How Endless Choice is Creating Unlimited Demand. London: Random House.
Anderson, Chris. 2009. Free: The Future of a Radical Price. London: Random House.
Balzer, David, 2015. Curationism: How Curating Took Over the Art World and Everything Else. London: Pluto.
Basilisk, DJ. n.d. ‘Requirements’. https://ektoplazm.com/distribution/requirements
Basilisk, DJ. 2012. ‘A Beginner’s Guide to Ektoplazm’. https://ektoplazm.com/blog/a-beginners-guide-to-ektoplazm
Bhaskar, Michael. 2016. Curation: The Power of Selection in a World of Excess. London: Piatkus.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. ‘The forms of capital.’ In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed John Richardson, 241-258. Westport: Greenwood.
Boyle, James. 1997. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Creative Commons, 2013. ‘Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)’. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Fikentscher, Kai. 2000. “You Better Work!” Underground Dance Music in New York City. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Hartmann, Björn. 2004. ‘Netlabels and the Adoption of Creative Commons Licensing in the Online Electronic Music Community’. https://web.archive.org/web/20080807161418/http://fr.creativecommons.org/articles/hartmann.htm
Keen, Andrew. 2007. The Cult of the Amateur. New York: Doubleday.
Kim, Minjeong. 2007. ‘The Creative Commons and Copyright Protection in the Digital Era: Uses of Creative Commons Licenses’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13/1: 187-209.
Klimis, George. 1999. ‘Disintermediation and re-intermediation in the music business: the effect of multimedia technologies and E-commerce.’ Ph.D. diss., City University of London.
Lee, Benjamin & LiPuma, Edward. 2002. ‘Cultures of Circulation: The Imaginations of Modernity’. Public Culture 14/1: 191-213.
Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
Lessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: The Penguin Press.
Morris, Jeremy Wade. 2015. Selling Digital Music: Formatting Culture. Oakland CA: University of California Press.
Nevue, David. 2001. ‘Instrumental Guitarist Rides MP3.com to Success’. Music Biz Academy.com, June 2001. http://www.musicbizacademy.com/internet/mp3success.htm.
Orlowski, Andrew. 2003. ‘MP3.com archive is destroyed’. The Register, December 3, 2003. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/12/03/mp3_com_archive_is_destroyed/.
Phan, Monty. 2007. ‘Oink users recall defunct song-swap site’s strange, stringent rules’. Wired, October 26, 2007. https://www.wired.com/2007/10/oink-users-recall-defunct-song-swap-sites-strange-stringent-rules/.
Reitsamer, Rosa. 2011. ‘The DIY Careers of Techno and Drum ‘n’ Bass DJs in Vienna’. Dancecult 3/1: 28-43.
St. John, Graham. 2012. Global Tribe: Technology, Spirituality and Psytrance. Sheffield: Equinox.
Taylor, Timothy. 2001. Strange Sounds: Music, Technology and Culture. New York: Routledge.
Terranova, Tiziana. 2000. ‘Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy’. Social Text 18/2: 33-58.
Thornton, Sarah. 1995. Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Oxford: Polity.
Tuomola, Arto. 2004. ‘Disintermediation and Reintermedation of the Sound Recording Value Chain: Two Case Studies.’ Journal of Media Business Studies 1/1: 27-46.
UMG vs. MP3.com (2001) 92 F.Supp.2d 349
Witt, Stephen. 2015. How Music Got Free: What Happens When an Entire Generation Commits the Same Crime? London: The Bodley Head.
Ott, 2011. Mir. BandCamp: Ottsonic.