How accent and gender influence perceptions of competence and warmth in the medical profession
Previous research has shown that we evaluate social categories differently based on the two fundamental dimensions of competence and warmth. Findings indicate that doctors, men and standard accents are perceived as more competent, while nurses, women and regional accents are perceived as warmer. In a short experiment manipulating gender (man; woman), occupation (doctor; nurse) and accent (Standard British English; regional accent), participants rated the targets on perceived competence, warmth and status. The main results showed that doctors were rated as more competent providing they spoke using Standard British English, and warmer, as long as they spoke with a regional accent. This poses a potential problem, as doctors need to be perceived as competent in their diagnoses and treatment decisions, but also warm in their communication of important and sensitive information. The implications of these findings are discussed in order to highlight the importance of using multiple social categories to represent the complexity of everyday interactions.
Author: Tamara Rakić
Allport, G. W. (1954) Nouns that cut slices. In The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Burgoon, J. K. and Burgoon, M. (2001) Expectancy theories. In W. P. Robinson and H. Giles (eds) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (2nd edn) 79–102. Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. and Glick, P. (2008) Competence and warmth as universal trait dimensions of interpersonal and intergroup perceptions: the stereotype content model and the BIAS map. In M. P. Zanna (ed.) Advances in Experimental Psychology, Volume 40 61–149. New York: Academic Press.
Fiske, S. T. and Neuberg, S. L. (1990) A continuum of impression formation, form category based to individuating processes: influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 23 1–74. San Diego: Academic Press.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. and Xu, J. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(6): 878–902.
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Girard, F. and Goslin, J. (2009) Categorization of regional and foreign accent in 5- to 7-year-old British children. International Journal of Behavioral Development 33(4): 366–375.
Garrett, P. (2010) Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H. and Johnson, P. (1987) Ethnolinguistic identity theory: a social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 68: 69–99.
Giles, H. and Rakić, T. (2014) Language attitudes: the social determinants and consequences of language variation. In T. Holtgraves (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology 11–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hansen, K., Steffens, M. C., Rakić, T. and Wiese, H. (2017) When appearance does not match accent: neural correlates of ethnicity-related expectancy violations. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12(3): 507–15.
Ko, S. J., Judd, C. M. and Blair, I. V. (2006) What the voice reveals: within- and between-category stereotyping on the basis of voice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(6): 806–19.
Lambert, W. E., Anisfeld, M. and Yeni-Komshian, G. (1965) Evaluation reactions of Jewish and Arab adolescents to dialect and language variations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2(1): 84–90.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997) English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London, New York: Routledge.
Rakić, T. and Steffens, M. C. (2013) Language attitudes in Western Europe. In H. Giles and B. M. Watson (eds) The Social Meanings of Language, Dialect, and Accent 45–64. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K. and Hodgins, H. S. (1991) Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(4): 545–54.