Item Details

Qualifying Secular Sacralizations

Issue: Vol 15 No. 4 (2012)

Journal: Implicit Religion

Subject Areas: Religious Studies

DOI: 10.1558/imre.v15i4.533

Abstract:

We propose a model for qualifying the experiences that people have with “free floating objects and events of religion.” The theories of implicit religion or nonreligion do not offer such a refinement. With the help of Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age we conceptualize both religion and secularity in a positive way. Using Meerten ter Borg’s theory, we distinguish within the secular field three degrees of religiosity that are rather near to religion in the strict sense: (1) functional equivalents of religion, (2) moments of sacralization, and (3) fragments of sacralization. Some examples and analogies confirm the adequacy of this model.

Author: Frans Jespers, David Kleijbeuker, Yentl Schattevoet

View Original Web Page

References :

Bailey, E. 1990. “The Implicit Religion of Contemporary Society: Some Studies and Reflections.” Social Compass 37(4): 483–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003776890037004006
———. 2004. “Implicit Religion.” In Encyclopedia of New Religions, edited by C. Partridge, 397–398. Oxford: Lion Publishing.
———. 2009. “Implicit Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by P. B.Clarke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2010. “Implicit Religion.” Religion 40: 271–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2010.07.002
Bien, T. 2006. Mindful Therapy: A Guide for Therapists and Helping Professionals. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.
Borg, M. ter. 2008. “Impliciete Religiositeit: Collectieve Devoties en Sacraliseringen Gedefinieerd.” In Handboek Religie in Nederland: Perspectief – Overzicht – Debat, edited by M. ter Borg et al., 301–308. Zoetermeer: Meinema.
Bullivant, S. and L. Lee. 2012. “Interdisciplinary Studies of Non-religion and Secularity: The State of the Union.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 19–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642707
Campbell, C. 1971. Towards a Sociology of Irreligion. London: MacMillan.
Cartwell, C. 1995. The Art of Living: Aesthetics of the Ordinary in World Spiritual Traditions. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Crane, R. 2009. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy: Distinctive Features. London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. 1992. “Transcendence from Within, Transcendence in this World.” In Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, edited by D. S. Browning and F. Schüssler Fiorenza, 226–250. New York: Crossroad.
Jespers, F. 2011. “The Scientific Study of Religious and Secular Spiritualities.” Journal of Religion in Europe 4(2): 328–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187489211X574409
Kabat-Zinn, J. 2012. Mindfulness for Beginners: Reclaiming the Present Moment. Boulder: Sounds True.
Lanman, J. A. 2012. “The Importance of Religious Displays for Belief Acquisition and Secularization.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 49–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642726
Lee, L. 2012. “Research Note: Talking about a Revolution: Terminology for the New Field of Non-religion Studies.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 129–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642742
Luhmann, N. 1977. Funktion der Religion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Riesebrodt, M. 2010. The Promise of Salvation: A Theory of Religion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, C. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Thich Nhat Hanh and L. Cheung. 2010. Savor: Mindful Eating, Mindful Life. New York: HarperOne.
Websites
www.katharen.be (accessed on May 3, 2012)
www.pratenoververlies.nl (accessed on May 3, 2012)