Item Details

The Abduction of Śrī-Rukmiṇī: Politics, Genealogy and Theology in 87–90

Issue: Vol 33 No. 1 (2014)

Journal: Religious Studies and Theology

Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies

DOI: 10.1558/rsth.v33i1.23

Abstract:

This article examines the Harivaṃśa’s rendering of Vāsudeva Kṛṣṇa’s encounter with and marriage to Rukmiṇī of Vidarbha (HV 87–90), and proposes that this episode of Kṛṣṇa’s life is of special importance to the Harivaṃśa’s larger concern to develop in full the Mahābhārata’s partial portrait of the adult Vāsudeva Kṛṣṇa. I argue that the Harivaṃśa’s basic work of unpacking Kṛṣṇa’s adult identity advances on three fronts simultaneously: genealogical, political and theological, and that it is especially by recounting Kṛṣṇa’s relationship with Rukmiṇī that the poets are able to develop all at once some of the key political, genealogical and theological dimensions of Kṛṣṇa’s identity revealed only partially in the Mahābhārata.

Author: Christopher R Austin

View Original Web Page

References :

Austin, Christopher R. 2011. “The Mystery of the Syamantaka Jewel: the Intersection of Genealogy and Biography in the Harivaṃśa.” Religions of South Asia 5 (1 and 2): 153–169.
———. 2013. “The Fructification of the Tale of a Tree: The Pārijātaharaṇa in the Harivaṃśa and Its Appendices.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 133(2): 249–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.133.2.0249
Brockington, Mary, ed. 2002. Stages and Transitions: Temporal and Historical Frameworks in Epic and Purāṇic Literature. Proceedings of the Second Dubrovnik International Conference on the Sanskrit Epics and Purāṇas, August 1999. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Brockington, John. 2002. “Jarāsaṃdha of Magadha (MBh 2,15–22).” In Stages and Transitions: Temporal and Historical Frameworks in Epic and Purāṇic Literature. Proceedings of the Second Dubrovnik International Conference on the Sanskrit Epics and Purāṇas, August 1999, edited by Mary Brockington, 73–88. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Brodbeck, Simon. 2011. “The Ancient Indian Rājasūya Revisited.” Paper presented at the Annual Sanskrit Tradition in the Modern World Symposium, University of Manchester, May 27.
Coleman, Tracy. 2002. “Suffering Desire for Krishna: Gender and Salvation in the Bhāgavata Purāṇa.” Journal of Vaishnava Studies 10(2): 39–50.
———. 2003. “The Abduction of Rukmiṇī.” Journal of Vaishnava Studies 12(1): 25–56.
Couture, André. 1996. “The Harivaṃśa: A Supplement to the Mahābhārata.” Journal of Vaiṣṇava Studies 4(3): 127–138.
———. 2003. “Dvārakā: The Making of a Sacred Place.” In Pilgrims, Patrons and Place: Localizing Sanctity in Asian Religions, edited by Phyllis Granoff and Koichi Shinohara, 224–248. Toronto: UBC Press.
———. 2006. “The emergence of a group of four characters (Vāsudeva, Saṃkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha) in the Harivaṃśa: points for consideration.” Journal of Indian Philosophy 34: 571–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10781-006-9009-x
Couture, André and Charlotte Schmid. 2001. “The Harivaṃśa, the Goddess Ekānaṃśā, and the Iconography of the Vṛṣṇi Triads.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 121(2): 173–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/606559
Gonda, Jan. 1970. Viṣṇuism and Śivaism: A Comparison. London: Athlone Press.
Grünedahl, Reinhold. 1997a. “Zur Textkritik des Nārāyaṇīya.” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 30–74. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
———. 1997b. “Zur Stellung des Nārāyaṇīya im Mahābhārata.” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 197–240. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
———. 1997c. “Parallelen des Nārāyaṇīya und Anmerkungen zu seiner Wirkungsgeschichte.” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 296–378. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Gupta, Sanjukta. 1971. “The Caturvyūha and the Viśākha-yūpa in the Pāñcarātra.” The Adyar Library Bulletin 35(3–4): 189–204.
Harman, William P. 1989. Sacred Marriage of a Hindu Goddess. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hiltebeitel, Alf. 2006. “The Nārāyaṇīya and the Early Reading Communities of the Mahābhārata.” In Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE–400 CE, edited by Patrick Olivelle, 227–256. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305326.003.0010
Ingalls, Daniel H. H. 1968. “The Harivaṃśa as a Mahākāvya.” In Mélanges d’Indianisme à la Mémoire de Louis Renou, 381–394. Paris: Éditions de Boccard.
Jaiswal, Suvira. 1981. The Origin and Development of Vaiṣṇavism. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
Kinjawadekar, Pandit Ramachandrashāstri, ed. 1936. Harivanshaparvan with Bhārata Bhāwadeepa by Neelakantha. Poona: Shankar Narhar Joshi (Citrashala Press).
Kinsley, David. 1986. Hindu Goddesses: Vision of the Divine Feminine in the Hindu Religious Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Malinar, Angelika. 1997. “Nārāyaṇa und Kṛṣṇa: Aspekte der Gotteslehre des Nārāyaṇīya im Vergleich zur Bhagavadgītā.” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 241–295. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Matchett, Freda. 1996. “The Harivaṃśa: Supplement to the Mahābhārata and Independent Text.” Journal of Vaiṣṇava Studies 4(3): 139–150
———. 2001. Kṛṣṇa: Lord or Avatāra? The relationship between Kṛṣṇa and Viṣṇu. Richmond: Curzon Press.
Matsubara, Mitsunori. 1994. Pāñcarātra Saṃhitās and Early Vaiṣṇava Theology: With a Translation and Critical Notes from Chapters on Theology in the Ahirbudhnya Saṃhitā. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Miller, Barbara Stoler. 1975. “Rādhā: Consort of Kṛṣṇa’s Vernal Passion.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 95(4): 655–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/601022
Oberlies, Thomas. 1997a. “Die Textgeschichte der Śvetadvīpa-Episode des Nārāyaṇīya (MBh 12,321–326).” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 75–118. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
———. 1997b. “Die Textgeschichte des Adhyāya 326.” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 119–138. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1997.
———. 1997c. “Gottesnamen, Opferkonzeptionen und Zeithorizonte in Teil A des Nārāyaṇīya.” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 139–158. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Olivelle, Patrick ed. 2006. Between the Empires: Society in India 300 BCE–400 CE. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pathak, M.M., ed. 1997–1999. The Critical Edition of the Viṣṇupurāṇam. 2 vols. Vadodara: Oriental Institute.
Pauwels, Heidi. 2007. “Stealing a Willing Bride: Women’s Agency in the Myth of Rukmiṇī’s Elopement.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 17: 407–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1356186307007523
Schrader, F. Otto. 1916. Introduction to the Pāñcarātra and the Ahirbudhnya Saṃhitā. Madras: Adyar Library.
Schreiner, Peter, ed. 1997a. Nārāyaṇīya-Studien. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
———. 1997b. “«Schau Gottes»—ein Leitmotiv indischer Religionsgeschichte?” In Nārāyaṇīya-Studien, edited by Peter Schreiner, 159–96. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Shastri, J. L., ed. 1983. Bhāgavata Purāṇa of Kṛṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa, with the Sanskrit commentary Bhāvārthabodhinī of Śrīdharasvāmin. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Srinivasan, Doris M. 1979. “Early Vaiṣṇava Imagery: Caturvyūha and Variant Forms.” Archives of Asian Art 32: 39–54.
Sukthankar, Vishnu Sitaram, ed. 1933-1966. The Mahābhārata (Critical Edition). 19 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Vaidya, Parashuram Lakshman, ed. 1969–1971. The Harivamśa: Being the Khila, or Supplement to the Mahābhārata. 2 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
Van Buitenen, J.A.B., ed. and trans. 1975. The Mahābhārata. vol. 2. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.