Item Details

Researching Learner Self-Efficacy and Online Participation through Speech Functions: An exploratory study

Issue: Vol 34 No. 2 (2017)

Journal: CALICO Journal

Subject Areas:

DOI: 10.1558/cj.26389

Abstract:

This study explores the potential contribution of Eggins and Slade’s (2004) Speech Functions as tools for describing learners’ participation patterns in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication (SCMC). Our analysis focuses on the relationship between learners’ self-efficacy (i.e. personal judgments of second language performance capabilities) and discourse roles displayed in the online medium. A small corpus of data was selected as a sample from a larger study, comprising one face-to-face interaction (FtF2) and one synchronous text-based chat interaction (SCMC2) between two participants: Celine, a high-self-efficacy (HSE) learner, and Concetta, a low-self-efficacy (LSE) learner. The chat-log and conversation transcript were analyzed by employing: (a) quantitative measures of participation; namely words and turns produced by the participants, (b) Dörnyei and Kormos’s (1998) taxonomy of Communication Strategies, and (c) Eggins and Slade’s (2004) classification of speech functions. Our results suggest that speech functions are indeed effective at describing the social roles enacted by learners during interaction across the two media, in terms of discourse dependence or independence, as well as dominance. Therefore, by complementing other methods, such as quantitative measures of participation and qualitative analyses of communication strategies, speech functions can contribute to providing a comprehensive picture of the relationship between SCMC, learners’ selfefficacy, and participation patterns.

Author: Olga Sanchez-Castro, Antonella Strambi

View Full Text

References :

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.


Blanco, J., Garcia, M. I., & Aparisi, M. C. (2004). Revista. Boston, MA: Vista Higher Learning.


Bock, Z. (2013). Cyber socialising: Emerging genres and registers of intimacy among young South African students. Language Matters, 44(2), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2013.784924


Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). Harlow, Essex: Longman.


Chaudron, C. (1982). Vocabulary elaboration in teachers’ speech to L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310000440X


Coffin, C., North, S., & Martin, D. (2009). Exchanging and countering points of view: A linguistic perspective on school students’ use of electronic conferencing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00280.x


Cohen, J. (1969). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104


De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–24.


Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198003039


Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300.


D00. 275 Teaching Research, 4 variables in oral task performanceith a special focus on the use of technology, as well as in cross-culturSelected papers from the proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium of the Deseret Language and Linguistics Society (pp. 155–168). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.


Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2004). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Publishing.


Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1984). Two ways of defining communication strategies. Language Learning, 34, 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00995.x


Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 67–86.


Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19(1), 3–17.


Graham, S. (2006). A study of students’ metacognitive beliefs about foreign language study and their impact on learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02267.x


Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.


Han, K. (2003). ESL learners’ self-efficacy and language anxiety in computer-networked interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin.


Hussin, N. (2009). Interaction from an activity theoretical perspective: Comparing learner discourse of language face-to-face, in chat and in audio conferencing in second language learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.


Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef


Jones, R., Garralda, A., Li, D., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.12.001


Khamis, H. (2010). Communication strategies in computer-mediated communication: An Egyptian EFL context. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.35-48


Kost, C. R. (2008). Use of communication strategies in a synchronous CMC environment. In S. S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 153–189). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.3.11kos


Kissau, S., McCullough, H., & Pyke, G. (2010). “Levelling the playing field”: The effects of online second language instruction on student willingness to communicate in French. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.277-297


Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 102–120.


Lam, W., & Wong, M. (2000). The effects of strategy training on developing discussion skills in an ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 54, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.3.245


Lamy, M.-N. (2012). Click if you want to speak: Reframing CA for research into multimodal conversations in online learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2012010101


Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Lin, W.-C., Huang, H.-T., & Liou, H.-C. (2013). The effects of text-based SCMC on SLA: A meta analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 123–142.


Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. New York: New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x


Mills, N. (2004). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to motivation, achievement and proficiency. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from University Microfilms International US (Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 65 (2-A), 440).


Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-17-.x


Mori, S. (1999). The role of motivation in the amount of reading. Temple University Japan Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 14, 51–68.


Nakatami, Y. (2010). Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners’ oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00987.x


O’Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090253


Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students: A path analysis. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 163–175.


Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Perception (pp. 239–265). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.


Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.


Poulisse, N. (1993). A theoretical account of lexical communication strategies. In R. Schreuder & B. Weltens (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 157–189). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.6.09pou


Reinhardt, J. (2008). Negotiating meaningfulness: An enhanced perspective on interaction in computer-mediated foreign language learning environments. In S. Magnan Pierce (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 219–244). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.3.13rei


Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2007). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.


Sánchez Castro, O. (2013). Language learners’ self-efficacy and interactional patterns in oral and computer-mediated communication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Flinders University, Adelaide.


Sauro, S. (2009). Strategic use of modality during synchronous CMC. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.1.101-117


Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Casual and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.


Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). New York: Irvington Publishers.


Schunk, D. H. (1985). Self-efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools 22, 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2%3C208::AID-PITS2310220215%3E3.0.CO;2-7


Shokouhi, H., & Hamidi, N. (2010). A conversation analysis of the Iranian youths’ written chats of English. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 149–177.


Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 79–97). Heilderberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6


Tarone, E. (1977). Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage: A progress report. On TESOL, 77, 194–203.


Tarone, E., & Yule, G. (1987). Communication strategies in east–west interactions. In L. Smith (Ed.), Discourse across cultures: Strategies in world Englishes (pp. 49–65). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.


Thomas, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching and CALL. In H. Reinders & M. Thomas (Eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 341–355). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.


Vandergriff, I. (2006). Negotiating common ground in computer-mediated versus face-to-face discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 110–138.


Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x


Wong, M. (2005). Language learning strategies and language self-efficacy. RELC, 36(3), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688205060050


Wu, W.-C., & Marek, M. (2010). Making English a “habit”: Increasing confidence, motivation, and ability of EFL students through cross-cultural, computer-assisted interaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 101–112.


Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers and Education, 52, 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.007


Yim, Y.-K. K. (2005). Second language speakers’ participation in computer mediated discussions in graduate seminars (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.