Item Details

Sustaining multimodal language learner interactions online

Issue: Vol 32 No. 3 (2015)

Journal: CALICO Journal

Subject Areas:

DOI: 10.1558/cj.v32i3.26508

Abstract:

Social presence is considered an important quality in computer mediated communication as it promotes willingness in learners to take risks through participation in interpersonal exchanges (Kehrwald, 2008) and makes communication more natural (Lowenthal, 2010). While social presence has mostly been investigated through questionnaire data and quantitative content analysis of online interactions based on a set of predefined indicators, in a smaller number of studies the concept has also been investigated through qualitative analysis of interviews (Kehrwald, 2008, 2010). Yet studies that bring together multiple sources of data collection and examine multimodal language learning contexts are almost non-existent. In this paper, the theory of social presence is employed to explicate language learners’ online multimodal communication using a case study approach. Multiple sources of data were collected, including interviews, open-ended and closed post-task questionnaires, stimulated reflection and recordings of video interactions. The main findings of the study included an innovative social presence framework developed for the analysis of online multimodal language learner interactions (Satar, 2010), which can be used in further qualitative and exploratory research. It also has potential applicability for educators to develop strategies for language learners to guide them in creating and transmitting their social presence. The focus of this article is a cross-case analysis for one of the components of social presence, sustaining interaction, bringing together social presence theory, interactional sociolinguistics and multimodal interaction analysis. Finally, strategies are proposed for language learners on how to sustain their online multimodal interactions.

Author: H. Müge Satar

View Full Text

References :

Andersen, P. A. (2008). Nonverbal Communication: Forms and Functions. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press Inc.


Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28 (3), 289–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786027


Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers' social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10 (1), 42–66. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/arnoldducate/default.html


Batstone, C., Stickler, U., Duensing, A., & Heins, B. (2007). Social presence in face-to-face and online language tutorials. Presented at the BAAL-CUP Seminar: Spoken Online Learning Events: the need for a new paradigm in languages research and practice, Milton Keynes.


Bee Bee, S., & Gardner, D. (2012). Crossing the borders in language learning through the use of web-conferencing as an e-learning tool. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 8 (1), 120–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2012.044686


Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment, 12 (5), 456–480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761270


Bozkaya, M. (2008). The relationship between teacher immediacy behaviours and distant learners' social presence perceptions in videoconferencing applications. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9 (1), 180–192.


Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. E. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67 (1), 96–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376497


Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.


Darhower, M. (2007). A tale of two communities: Group dynamics and community building in a Spanish-English telecollaboration. CALICO Journal, 24 (3), 561–589.


Develotte, C., Guichon, N. and Vincent, C. (2010) The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL, 22 (3): 293–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000170


Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4 (3), 193–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400302


Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Distance Learning, (2nd edn) 352–355, Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch052


Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87–105.


Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13 (1–2), 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003


Guichon, N. & Cohen, C. (2014). The impact of the webcam on an Online L2 interaction. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 70 (3), 331–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2102


Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834


Gumperz, J. J. (2003). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 215–228. Oxford: Blackwell.


Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11 (3), 8–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970


Guo, S. (2014). Evaluation of a web conferencing tool and collaborative tasks in an online Chinese course. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S. Thouesny (Eds), CALL Design: Principles and Practice; Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands, 119-126. Dublin: Research-publishing.net. http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2014.000205


Hammersley, M. (1992). What's Wrong with Ethnography?: Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.


Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24 (2), 116–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X


Heiser, S., Stickler, U., & Furnborough, C. (2013). Student training in the use of an online synchronous conferencing tool. CALICO Journal, 30 (2), 226–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.2.226-251


Hughes, M., Ventura, S., & Dando, M. (2007). Assessing social presence in online discussion groups: A replication study. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 44 (1), 17–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290601090366


Jones, R. H. (2012). Discourse Analysis: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.


Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29 (1), 89–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910802004860


Kehrwald, B. (2010). Being online: social presence as subjectivity in online learning. London Review of Education, 8 (1), 39–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14748460903557688


Kim. E. (2007). Students' perception of social presence and its influence on their learning in an online environment: A case study. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 30th Annual Proceedings, Selected Research and Development Papers at the 2007 Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 118–124). Anaheim, CA.


King, K. D. (2007). Comparison of Social Presence in Voice-based and Text-based Asynchronous Computer Conferencing. (PhD thesis). Nova Southeastern University. Computing Technology in Education (MCTE, DCTE)


King, K., & Ellis, T. J. (2009). Comparison of Social Presence in Voice-Based and Text- Based Asynchronous Computer Conferences. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.


Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.


Lamy, M.-N., & Goodfellow, R. (1999). ‘Reflective conversation’ in the virtual language classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 2 (2), 43–61. http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article2


Lamy, M., & Flewitt, R. (2011). Describing online conversations: Insights from a multimodal approach. In C. Develotte, R. Kern, & M. Lamy (Eds), Décrire la conversation en ligne: Le face à face distanciel. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.


Leontiev, A. A. (1981). Psychology and the Language Learning Process. (C. V. James, Ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.


van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5


Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. California, London, New Delhi: SAGE.


Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. System, 35 (2), 208–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.11.002


Lowenthal, P. R. (2010). The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online Education and Adult Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices, 124–139. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-830-7.ch010


Lowenthal, P. R. (2012). Social presence: What is it? How do we measure it? (PhD thesis). University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado.


Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2014). Problems Measuring Social Presence in a Community of Inquiry. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11 (1), 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.19


Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01064


Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1 (2), 320–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x


Na Ubon, A. (2005). Social presence in asynchronous text-based online learning communities: A longitudinal case study using content analysis (PhD thesis). The University of York.


Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.


Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230505056


Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The impact of supervisor and subordinate immediacy on relational and organizational outcomes. Communication Monographs, 67 (1), 85–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750009376496


Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l'Éducation à Distance, 14 (2), 50–71.


Satar, H. M. (2007). Task-based language learning in written synchronous computer mediated communication. Unpublished MRes Dissertation. The Open University, UK, Milton Keynes.


Satar, H. M. (2010). Social presence in online multimodal communication: a framework to analyse online interactions between language learners. Unpublished PhD thesis. The Open University, Milton Keynes.


Satar, H. M. (2013). Multimodal Language Learner Interactions via Desktop Videoconferencing within a Framework of Social Presence: Gaze. ReCALL, 25 (1), 122–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000286


Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: Wiley & Sons.


Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text, and Interaction (3rd edn). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.


Sindoni, M. G. (2013). Spoken and Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach. London: Routledge.


Stainton-Rogers, W. (2006). Logics of inquiry. In S. Potter (Ed.), Doing Postgraduate Research (2nd edn, pp. 73–91). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.


Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.


Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edn, pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE.


Stickler, U., Batstone, C., Duensing, A., and Heins, B. (2007) Distant Classmates: speech and silence in online and telephone language tutorials. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2007 (2). http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2007/Stickler_Batstone_Duensing_Heins.pdf


Stockwell, G. (2003). Effects of topic threads on sustainability of email interactions between native speakers and nonnative speaker. ReCALL 15 (1), 37–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0958344003000417


Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd edn). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.


Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2 (1), 23–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1463631022000005016


Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9 (3), 115–136.


Tu, C., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (3), 131–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2


Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Wang, Y. (2008). Distance Language Learning and Desktop Videoconferencing: A Chinese Language Case Study. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.


Wanzer, M. B., & McCroskey, J. C. (1998). Teacher socio-communicative style as a correlate of student affect toward teacher and course material. Communication Education, 47 (1), 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529809379109


Weinel, M., & Hu, C. (2007). Social presence and student perceptions in the blend of synchronous and asynchronous communication forms. In Advanced Learning Technologies, IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 0, pp. 701-703). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2007.229


Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers & Education, 52 (4), 820–833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.007


Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2007). Social presence in synchronous cmc-based language learning: How does it affect the productive performance and consciousness of learning objectives? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20 (1), 37–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220601118503


Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.