Second Language Teacher Development through CALL Practice: The Emergence of Teachers’ Agency
Issue: Vol 32 No. 3 (2015)
Journal: CALICO Journal
Subject Areas:
Abstract:
A growing number of studies examining second language (L2) teacher education from the perspective of sociocultural theory, in particular the activity theory framework (Engeström, 1999), show that transformations in teachers’ cognition and practice can be fostered through negotiation of sociocultural and cognitive dissonance in their teaching environments. This case study examines 16 years of cognitive development of two Japanese language teachers practicing computer-assisted language learning (CALL) and the challenges they experienced as a result of the evolution of information and communications technology (ICT). The focus is on the challenges faced by L2 teachers and their responses, and how these challenges relate to the development of teachers’ agency as CALL practitioners. Narrative inquiry data for both participants were collected following the Trajectory Equifinality Approach (e.g., Valsiner & Sato, 2006), in which each teacher’s life trajectory is visualized to identify critical points based on social affordances and constraints. The critical points were further analyzed and interpreted within and between activity systems. The data suggests that the teachers became aware of the social nature of the technology through the challenges they encountered when coordinating their own and students’ mismatched values attached to ICT. Such a change in perceptions not only impacted their pedagogical usage of the technology but in turn also constituted their agency.
Author: Keiko Kitade
References :
Ahearn, M. L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
Ahn, K. (2011). Learning to teach under curricular reform: The practicum experience in South Korea. In K. E. Johnson & P. R. Golombek (Eds), Research on Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective on Professional Development, 239–253. New York: Routledge.
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher Identity Discourses: Negotiating Personal and Professional Spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German–American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (1), 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00179
Bergson, H. (1910). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). London: George Allen and Unwin.
Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13 (1), 53-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1301_5
Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds), Handbook of Constructionist Research, 397–412. New York: The Guilford Press.
Cross, R. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. The Modern Language Journal, 94 (3), 434–452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01058.x
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Knosultit. Retrieved 15 March 2014, from <http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm>
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki-Gitai (Eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory: Learning in Doing, 19–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.003
Engeström, Y. (2009a). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutierrez, K. (Eds), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, 303–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511809989.020
Engeström, Y. (2009b). From learning environments and implementation to activity systems and expansive learning. An International Journal of Human Activity Theory, 2, 17–
33.
Farrell, T. (2007). Reflective Language Teaching: From Research to Practice. London: Continuum.
Feryok, A. (2008). An Armenian English language teacher’s practical theory of communicative language teaching. System, 36 (2), 227–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.09.004
Feryok, A. (2012). Activity theory and language teacher agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96 (1), 95–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01279.x
Freeman, D. (1996). The ‘unstudied problem’: Research on teacher learning in language teaching. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching, 351–378. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00969.x
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
Haupt, R., Kloyer, M., & Lange, M. (2007). Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development. Research Policy 36 (3), 387–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.004
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.). (2011). Research on Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective on Professional Development. New York: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed. & Trans.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, 37–71. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1983 [1975]). Activity, consciousness, personality. In Selected Psychological Works (V. Davydov, V. Zinchenko, A. A. Leontiev, & A. Petrovskij, Eds.); Vol. 2, 94–231. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Miller, J. M. (2009). Teacher identity. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education, 172–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pearson & The Flipped Learning Network (2013). Flipped Learning Professional Development. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonschool.com/flippedlearning
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 163–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm008
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. (Eds). (2009). Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989
Sato, T. (2013). Shitsu-teki kenkyu to human computer interaction no yutaka na setten to mirai e mukete [Towards the enriched point of contact and future between the qualitative research and human computer interaction]. The Human Interface, 15, 303–308.
Sato, T., Hidaka, T., & Fukuda, M. (2009). Depicting the dynamics of living the life: The trajectory equifinality model. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds), Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences, 217–240. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_10
Sato, T., Yasuda, Y., Kanazaki, M., & Valsiner, J. (2014). From describing to reconstructing life trajectories: How the TEA (Trajectory Equifinality Approach) explicates content-dependent human phenomena. In Wagoner, B. Chaudhary, N & Hviid, P. (Eds), Cultural Psychology and its Future: Complementarity in a New Key. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Schroots, J. J. F., & Ten Kate, C. A. (1989). Metaphors, aging and the life-line interview method. In D. Unruh & G. Livings (Eds), Current Perspectives on Aging and the Life Cycle: Vol. 3, Personal History Through the Life Course, 281–298. London: JAI Press.
Shelley, M., Murphy, L., & White, C. J. (2013). Language teacher development in a narrative frame: The transition from classroom to distance and blended settings. System, 41, 560–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.06.002
Singh, G., & Richards, J. (2006). Teaching and learning in the language teacher education course room: A critical sociocultural perspective. RELC Journal, 37 (2), 149–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688206067426
Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory. Theory & Psychology, 14 (4), 475–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354304044921
Tasker, T. (2011). Teacher learning through lesson study: An activity theoretical approach toward professional development in the Czech Republic. In K. E. Johnson & P. R. Golombek (Eds), Research on Second Language Teacher Education, 204–221. New York: Routledge.
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 38–67.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2007). Complexities of identity formation: A narrative inquiry of an EFL teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41 (4), 657–680.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The Guided Mind: A Sociogenetic Approach to Personality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in Minds and Societies. New Delhi: Sage.
Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2006). Historically Structured Sampling (HSS): How can psychology’s methodology became tuned in to the reality of the historical nature of cultural psychology? In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kolbl, & B. Zielke (Eds), Pursuit of Meaning. Advances in Cultural and Cross-cultural Psychology, 215–251. Bielefeld: Transkript. http://dx.doi.org/10.14361/9783839402344-010
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 163–186. London: Equinox.
Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. A. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, & Education, 4 (1), 21–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_2
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed. & Trans.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, 144–188. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1993). Studies on the History of Behavior: Ape, Primitive, and Child (V. I. Golod & J. E. Knox, Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Yasuda, Y., & Sato, T. (2012). TEM de wakaru jinsei no keiro: Shitsu-teki kenkyu no shin tenkai [Understanding life trajectory with trajectory equifinality model: A new perspective in qualitative research]. Tokyo: Seisho Shobo.
Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Vedeler, D., Salgado, J., Gonçalves, M. M., & Ferring, D. (2013). Human Development in the Life Course: Melodies of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019804