Opiate of Christ; or, John’s Gospel and the Spectre of Class
Issue: Vol 7 No. 3 (2011)
Journal: Postscripts: The Journal of Sacred Texts, Cultural Histories, and Contemporary Contexts
Subject Areas: Religious Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies
Abstract:
This article applies a Libertarian Marxist lens to the Gospel of John. In doing so, it highlights the agrarian-aristocratic class struggle that is refracted in the text and also seeks to problematize hierarchical and authoritarian ideologies. Its point of departure is the recent political interpretations of John championed by Tom Thatcher (2009) and Warren Carter (2008), but it diverges significantly from these readings by observing how the gospel’s so-called “subversive” quality has often been overstated and/or simply taken for granted. By focusing on the problematic re-inscription of hierarchies of power, the reading advanced below argues that John’s heightening of imperial ideology in Jesus is at best unsubversive and at worst normalizing of a fascist-like impulse for racial and authoritarian purity.
Author: Robert J. Myles
References :
Adorno, Theodor. 1991. The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.
Adorno, Theodor W. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.
Aichele, George. 2011. Simulating Jesus: Reality Effects in the Gospels. BibleWorld. London: Equinox.
Boer, Roland. 2012. Criticism of Earth: On Marx, Engels and Theology. Historical Materialism 35. Leiden: Brill. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004225589
Brown, Raymond E. 1988. The Gospel and Epistles of John: A Concise Commentary. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.
Carter, Warren. 2008. John and Empire: Initial Explorations. London: T&T Clark.
———. 2001. Matthew and Empire: Initial Explorations. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.
Casey, Maurice. 1996. Is John’s Gospel True?. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853699323281306
———. 1999. “Some Anti-Semitic Assumptions in the ‘Theological Dictionary of the New Testament.’” Novum Testamentum 41: 280–91.
Crossley, James G. 2015. Jesus and the Chaos of History. Biblical Reconfigurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570577.001.0001
Edwards, Mark. 2004. John. Blackwell Bible Commentaries. Malden: Blackwell.
Hezser, Catherine. 2005. Jewish Slavery in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280865.001.0001
Huie-Jolly, Mary. 2002. “Maori ‘Jews’ and a Resistant Reading of John 5: 10–47.” In John and Postcolonialism: Travel, Space and Power, edited by Musa W. Dube and Jeffrey L. Staley, 94–110. London: Sheffield Academic.
Jameson, Fredric. 1983. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
Liew, Tat-siong Benny. 2002. “Ambiguous Admittance: Consent and Descent in John’s Community of ‘Upward’ Mobility.” In John and Postcolonialism: Travel, Space and Power, edited by Musa W. Dube and Jeffrey L. Staley, 193–224. London: Sheffield Academic.
Marx, Karl. 1843. “A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction.” https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/critique-hpr/intro.htm.
Mckinnon, Andrew M. 2005. “Reading ‘Opium of the People’: Expression, Protest and the Dialectics of Religion.” Critical Sociology 31: 15–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1569163053084360.
Miranda, Jose. 1977. Being and the Messiah: The Message of St. John. Translated by John Eagleson. Maryknoll: Orbis.
Moore, Stephen D. 2006. Empire and Apocalypse: Postcolonialism and the New Testament. The Bible in the Modern World 12. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.
———. 2012. “The ‘Turn to Empire’ in Biblical Studies.” Search 35: 19–27.
Newton, Bert. 2012. Subversive Wisdom: Sociopolitical Dimensions of John’s Gospel. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.
Neyrey, Jerome H. 1995. “The Footwashing in John 13.6-11: Transformation or Ritual Ceremony?” In The Social World of the First Christians: Essays in Honour of Wayne A. Meeks, edited by L. Michael White and O. Larry Yarbrough, 198–213. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.
Richey, Lance Byron. 2007. Roman Imperial Ideology and the Gospel of John. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 43. Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America.
Segovia, Fernando F. 1982. “John 13: 1–20, The Footwashing in the Johannine Tradition.” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 73: 31–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zntw.1982.73.1-2.31.
Sick, David H. 2011. “The Architriklinos at Cana.” Journal of Biblical Literature 130: 513–526.
Skinner, Christopher W. 2013. “John’s Gospel and the Roman Imperial Context: An Evaluation of Recent Proposals.” In Jesus Is Lord, Caesar Is Not: Evaluating Empire in New Testament Studies, edited by Scot McKnight and Joseph B. Modica, 116–139. Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press Academic.
Streett, R. Alan. 2013. Subversive Meals: An Analysis of the Lord’s Supper under Roman Domination in the First Century. Eugene: Pickwick.
Thatcher, Tom. 2009. Greater Than Caesar: Christology and Empire in the Fourth Gospel. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.