Responding to the Radical in RIOT Bible
Issue: Vol 7 No. 3 (2011)
Journal: Postscripts: The Journal of Sacred Texts, Cultural Histories, and Contemporary Contexts
Subject Areas: Religious Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies
Abstract:
In response to the RIOT Bible articles by Sandford, Myles, and Wan, I consider what it means to be a ‘radical interpreter’ of the Bible. Reflecting in particular on the sense of ‘rootedness’ that the term ‘radical’ can convey, I explore how each author digs down to the roots of their subject, all the while pushing away from exegetical normativities to produce a reading that is both unconventional and ground-breaking.
Author: Caroline Blyth
References :
Myers, Ched. 1988. Binding the Strong Man: A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
Myles, Robert. 2014. “The Quest for the (Un)Subversive Jesus.” The Bible and Class Struggle. 19 December. https://bibleandclassstruggle.wordpress.com/tag/new-testament/.
Rodrigues, Jason. 2013. “April 1979: Thatcher outlines her radical ideology.” The Guardian, 17 April. Internet edition. http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/from-the-archive-blog/2013/apr/17/thatcher-margaret-speech-cardiff-1979.
Singh, Harkanwal. 2015. “God and money: Interactive map shows rich suburbs have most atheists,” New Zealand Herald. 13 May. Internet edition. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11447270.