Mediation in England and Wales: Why should it be mandatory?
Issue: Vol 1 No. 1 (2016)
Journal: Mediation Theory and Practice
The role of mediation in the resolution of civil disputes has grown enormously in recent years. However, the question of the governmental and judicial role in supporting mediation has divided policymakers around the world. In particular, the question of whether mediation should be compulsory in certain cases has generated significant debate. This article examines the prevailing views on this issue in England and Wales today. It then considers the arguments for and against implementing mandatory mediation, with reference to the experience of other jurisdictions that have experimented with compulsion. It concludes that judges ought to be afforded a discretionary power to order parties to attend mediation as a prerequisite to access to the state courts in appropriate circumstances.
Author: Julio César Betancourt, John Lee
Ahmed, M. (2012) Implied compulsory mediation. Civil Justice Quarterly 31(2): 151.
Alexander, N. (2009) International and Comparative Mediation: Legal Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.
Alexander, N. (2013) Harmonisation and diversity in the private international law of mediation: the rhythms of regulatory reform. In K. Hopt and F. Steffek (eds) Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective 131–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bathurst, Chief Justice (2012) The role of the courts in the changing dispute resolution landscape. University of New South Wales Law Journal 35(3): 870.
Brady, A. (2010) Jackson endorses the benefits of mediation in the legal process in England and Wales. Arbitration 76: 2.
Brown, H. and Marriott, A. (2012) ADR Principles and Practice (3rd edn). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Clarke, M. R. (2008) The future of civil mediation. Paper presented at the Second Civil Mediation Council National Conference, Birmingham, 8 May.
Dundas, H. (2010) Court-compelled mediation and the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6. Arbitration 76(2): 343.
European Parliament (2014) ‘Rebooting’ the Mediation Directive: Assessing the Limited Impact of its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the Number of Mediations in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament. Retrieved on 16 March 2016 from .
Genn, H., Fenn, P., Mason, M., Lane, A., Bechaim, N., Gray, L. and Vencappa, D. (2007) Twisting Arms: Court Referred and Court Linked Mediation under Judicial Pressure. London: Ministry of Justice.
Hank, M. (2012) Perspectives on Mandatory Mediation Forum. University of New South Wales Law Journal 18(2): 929.
Hann, R. and Baar, C. (2001) Evaluation of the Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rule 24.1). Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Hughes, P. (2001) Mandatory mediation: opportunity or subversion. Windsor Year Book of Access to Justice 19: 161.
Marks, T. and Betancourt, J. (2012) Rethinking public policy and alternative dispute resolution: negotiability, mediability and arbitrability. Arbitration 78(1): 19.
McIntosh, M. (2003) A step forward: mandatory mediations. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal 14: 280.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2015) Variations in the uptake of and resistance to mediation outside of the United States. In E. Rovine (ed.) Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation 189–224. Leiden: Brill.
Moore, C. (2014) The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict (4th edn). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pel, M. (2008) Referral to Mediation: A Practical Guide for an Effective Mediation Proposal. The Hague: SDU Uitgevers.
Pennock, J. and Chapman, J. (eds) (2007) Coercion. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Prince, S. (2009) ADR after the CPR: have ADR initiatives now assured mediation as an integral role in the civil justice system in England and Wales? In D. Dwyer (ed.) The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On 327. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robertson, M. (2004) The stamp of statistical approval. ADR Bulletin 7: 12.
Roebuck, D. (2007) The myth of modern mediation. Arbitration 73: 1.
Sander, F. (2007) Another view of mandatory mediation. Dispute Resolution Magazine 13(2): 16.
Sander, F. Allen, H. and Hensler, D. (1996) Judicial (mis)use of ADR? A debate. University of Toledo Law Review 27: 885.
Steffek, F. and Unberath, H. (2014) Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads. London: Bloomsbury.
Suter, E. (2015) Unreasonable refusal to mediate and costs. Arbitration 81(1): 2.
Walker, B. S. C. and Bell, A. (2000) Justice according to compulsory mediation. Bar News (Spring): 7.
Welsh, N. (2001) The thinning vision of self-determination in court-connected mediation: the inevitable price of institutionalization? Harvard Negotiation Law Review 6(1): 1.
Rosalba Alassini v. Telecom Italia SpA (Joined Cases C-317/08–C-320/08)  3 CMLR 17 ECJ.
Bradley v. Heslin  EWHC 3267 (Ch).
Egan v. Motor Services (Bath) Ltd  EWCA Civ 1002.
Faidi v. Elliot Corporation  EWCA Civ 287.
Garritt-Critchley v. Ronnan  3 Costs LR 453.
Halsey v. Milton Keynes General NHS Trust  EWCA Civ 576;  1 WLR. 3002 (CA (Civ Div)).
Hooper Bailie Associated Ltd v. Natcon Group Proprietary Ltd  28 NSWLR 194.
Laporte v. The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis  3 Costs LR 471.
Oliver v. Symons  EWCA Civ 267.
PGF II SA v. OMFS Co. 1 Ltd  EWCA Civ 1288.