The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East–West debate
Issue: Vol 1 No. 1 (2016)
Journal: East Asian Pragmatics
Evaluation is an important aspect of (im)politeness, and this article explores it from an interdisciplinary perspective. It starts by considering the East–West debate in politeness theory and argues that both emic and etic approaches to research can contribute usefully to the deliberations. It then maintains that, if we are to understand the impact of culture on people’s (im)politeness evaluations, we need to unpack the concept more thoroughly. It proposes that useful insights can be obtained from Haidt’s (e.g. Haidt & Kesebir, 2010) work on moral foundations and Schwartz’s (e.g. Schwartz et al., 2012) work on basic values. The article ends by revisiting the East–West debate, discussing the potential impact of other factors such as beliefs and ideologies, and noting the ongoing uncertainties over levels and links between the various concepts explored. It urges pragmaticists and psychologists to engage more fully with each other to help address these challenges.
Author: Helen Spencer-Oatey, Dániel Z. Kádár
Apte, M. (1994). Language in sociocultural context. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol.4, pp. 2000–2010). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bellah, R. N. (1991). Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post-traditionalist world. California: University of California Press.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Boer, D., & Fischer, R. (2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1113–1147.
Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Au, A., Tong, K.-K., Reimel De Carrasquel, S., Murakami, F., … Stetovska, I. (2004). Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(5), 548–570.
Bond, M. H., Žegarac, V., & Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culture as an explanatory variable: Problems and possibilities. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 47–71). London: Continuum.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published as Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon. In Esther Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Chen, R., He, L., & Hu, C. (2013). Chinese requests: In comparison to American and Japanese requests and with reference to the “East-West divide”. Journal of Pragmatics, 55(Sep), 140–161.
Cialdini, R. B. (2012). The focus theory of normative conduct. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 295–312). London: Sage.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome.
Fiske, A. P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 78–88.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Doubleday.
Hall, J. K. (2002). Teaching and researching language and culture. London: Longman.
Harris, M. (2001). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture (updated ed.). Walnut Creek: AltaMera Press.
Haugh, M. (2007). Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 657–680.
Hinze, C. G. (2007). Looking into ‘face’: The importance of Chinese mian and lian as emic categories. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini & M. Gotti (Eds.), Asian Business Discourses (pp. 169–210). Berne: Peter Lang.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. London: Sage.
Kádár, D. Z., & De La Cruz, M. (In Press). Rituals of outspokenness and verbal conflict. Pragmatics and Society, 6(1).
Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. New York: Harper & Row.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292–305). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Reimel de Carrasquel, S., Munoz, C., Hernandez, M., Murakami, F., … Singelis, T. M. (2002). Social axioms: The search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(3), 286–302.
Madsen, R. (1984). Morality and power in a Chinese village. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Moran, P. R. (2001). Teaching culture: Perspectives in practice. Boston: Heinle.
Olshtain, E. (1989). Apologies across languages. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 155–173). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Pan, Y. (2000). Politeness in Chinese face-to-face interaction. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Pan, Y., & Kádár, D. Z. (2011). Politeness in historical and contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.
Pizziconi, B. (2003). Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10–11), 1471–1506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00200-X
Pizziconi, B. (2011). Honorifics: The cultural specificity of a universal mechanism in Japanese. In D. Z. Kádár & S. Mills (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 45–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ran, Y., & Kádár, D. Z. (forthcoming). Intervention and morality in Chinese. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Saucier, G., Kenner, J., Iurino, K., Malham, P. B., Chen, Z., Thalmayer, A. G., … Altschul, C. (2015). Cross-cultural differences in a global “survey of world views”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(1), 53–70.
Schmidt, R. W. (1980). Review of E. N. Goody (Ed.) (1978) “Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction”. Cambridge Papers in Social Anthropology 8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. RELC Journal 12(2), 100–114.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (1997). Unequal relationships in high and low power distance societies. A comparative study of tutor-student role relations in Britain and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(3), 284–302.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (pp. 11–47). London: Continuum.
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Jiang, W. (2003). Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: Moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1633–1650.
Sugiyama Lebra, T. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Usami, M. (2002). Discourse Politeness in Japanese Conversation. Some Implications for a Universal Theory of Politeness. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Willis, J. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Xing, J. (2002). Relational management in British–Chinese business interactions (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Luton.
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Žegarac, V. (2007). A cognitive pragmatic perspective on communication and culture. In H. Kotthoff & H. Spencer-Oatey (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural communication (pp. 31–53). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.