The Development of Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in L2 Written Production through Informal Participation in Online Activities
Issue: Vol 34 No. 1 (2017)
Journal: CALICO Journal
Subject Areas:
DOI: 10.1558/cj.29513
Abstract:
Research into the online informal learning of English (OILE) examines how non-native speakers of English may develop L2 skills through participation in leisure activities on the Internet in the target language. Such activities include, e.g., watching television series, films or videos, interacting on Facebook, reading articles or listening to music. Recent OILE studies have focused on students at French universities and have sought to both inventory language users’ online participation habits and track their L2 development (Kusyk & Sockett, 2012; Sockett, 2011; Sockett, 2014; Toffoli & Sockett, 2015; Sockett & Kusyk, 2015). This paper provides updated OILE participation data on French students and, for the first time, German university students. In order to increase awareness about current OILE practices, results of a questionnaire (N = 953) of OILE habits are presented. In addition, development in complexity, accuracy and fluency of three individual study participants was tracked over a period of five months. Results show a great deal of inter- and intraindividual variation, highlighting the need to consider L2 development as a complex and nonlinear process, especially when analyzed within an online, informal context.
Author: Meryl Kusyk
References :
Aubin, D., & Dahan Dalmedico, A. (2002). Writing the history of dynamical systems and chaos: Longue durée and revolution, disciplines and cultures. Historia Mathematica, 29(3), 273–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.2002.2351
Baba, K. & Nitta, R. (2014). Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033
Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York, NY; London: Routledge.
Bybee, J., & Beckner, C. (2009). Usage-based theory. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 827–855). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0032
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
Cook, V. (2002). Background to the L2 User. In V. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 User (pp. 1–28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Council of Europe. (2011). Common reference levels self-assessment grid. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/education/elp/elpreg/Source/assessement_grid/assessment_grid_english.pdf
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 5–23). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.01deb
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., Thorne, S. L., & Verspoor, M. (2103). Dynamic systems theory as a comprehensive theory of second language development. In M. d. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutiérrez Mangado, & M. M. Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 199–220). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamics Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.
Ishikawa, T. (2007). The effect of manipulating task complexity along the [+/− Here-and-Now] dimension on L2 written narrative discourse. In M. d. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136–156). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.09kaw
Kusyk, M., & Sockett, G. (2012). From informal resource usage to incidental language acquisition: Language uptake from online television viewing in English. ASp, La Revue Du GERAS, 62, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.3104
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Ten “lessons” from Complex Dynamic Systems Theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research methodology on language development from a Complex Systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., & Zochowski, M. (2005). The emergence of personality: Dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 351–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.004
Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17–30). Oxford: Heinemann.
Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003585
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Sockett, G. (2011). From the cultural hegemony of English to online informal learning: Cluster frequency as an indicator of relevance in authentic documents. ASp, La Revue Du GERAS, 60, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.2469
Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414885
Sockett, G., & Kusyk, M. (2015). Online informal learning of English: Frequency effects in the uptake of chunks of language from participation in web-based activities. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 153–177). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-009
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks. The effects of collaboration. In M. d. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 157–177). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2010). How non-specialist students of English practice informal learning using web 2.0 tools. ASp, La Revue Du GERAS, 58, 125–144. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1851
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2015). University teachers’ perceptions of online informal learning of English (OILE). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776970
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1–2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.012
Tomasello, M. (2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E. L. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576164.005
van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.3
van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Development as Self-Organization: New Approaches to the Psychology and Neurobiology of Development, 25(3–4), 408–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in conciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(03), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009177
Vercellotti, M. L. (2015). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv002
Verspoor, M., & Behrens, H. (2011). Dynamic systems theory and a usage-based approach to second language development. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 25–38). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.) (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29
Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild: Creating social infrastructure for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 75–101). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-006
Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production (Doctoral dissertation). Temple University. Available from ProQuest dissertation and theses database. UMI No.9813575.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.