Preconditions of the Post-Theoretical: Periodizing the Study of Religion
Issue: Vol 46 No. 1 (2017)
Journal: Bulletin for the Study of Religion
Subject Areas: Religious Studies Buddhist Studies Islamic Studies Biblical Studies
DOI: 10.1558/bsor.31102
Abstract:
This article analyzes strategies of periodization both in the contemporary political discourse as well as in the construction of disciplinary identities in the study of religion.
Author: David Atwood
References :
Atwood, David. 2015. “The Discourse on Primal Religion. Disentangling Regimes of Truth.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (print forthcoming).
Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. Translated by Annette Lavers. New York: The Noonday Press.
Bayart, Jean-François. 1996. L’illusion identitaire. Paris: Fayard.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Driscoll, Christopher. 2016. White Lies. New York: Routledge.
Geertz, Armin W., and Russell T. McCutcheon. 2000. “The Role of Theory and Method in the IAHR.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 12: 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006800X00021.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. “On the Need for Theory in the Discipline of History.” The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts, transl. by Todd Samuel Presner et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 2010. “Fiktion und geschichtliche Wirklichkeit.” Vom Sinn und Unsinn der Geschichte. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 80-96.
McCutcheon, Russell. 2016. “Beyond Cynicism”. In this Volume. pp XX?
Nassehi, Armin. 2008. Die Zeit der Gesellschaft. Auf dem Weg zu einer soziologischen Theorie der Zeit. Wiesbaden: VS.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1990. Time and Narrative. Narrated Time. Volume 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schimmel, Annemarie. 1960. “Summary of the Discussion.” Numen 7: 235–39.
White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852760X00145
Zizek, Slavoj. 2014. Event. A Philosophical Journey Through a Concept. London: Melville House.