Item Details

The Problem of Evil and Liberal Theologies

Issue: Vol 24 No. 2 (2016)

Journal: Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism

Subject Areas: Philosophy

DOI: 10.1558/eph.31723


The Problem of Evil (POE), the idea that inexplicable human and non-human suffering is inconsistent with the existence of a benevolent, omniscient and omnipotent God, stands as one of the greatest challenges to classical theism. Many philosophers and theologians have offered theodicies, defense of God, in an attempt to blunt the force this problem. Others, however, believing that those theodicies have been effective have abandoned the classical definition of God and have embraced more liberal theologies, including deism, pantheism, process theology, and alterity theism. Theists of this sort argue that their theologies are immune from the POE. This is so because the POE derives its force from the supposed attributes of God. If God is not omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, the problem disappears. So rather than seek to resolve the POE, theists who hold one or the other of these non-classical positions seek to walk around it altogether. The problem simply dissolves, it is claimed, when these alternative theologies are embraced. This article critiques the most prominent liberal responses to the POE and demonstrates how they fail.

Author: William R Patterson

View Original Web Page

References :

Basinger, David. 1984. “Divine Persuasion: Could the Process God Do More?” The Journal of Religion 64(3): 332–347.

Brenner, William H. 2009. “D.Z. Phillips and Classical Theism.” New Blackfriars 90(1025): 17–37.

Chartier, Gary. 2006. “Non-human Animals and Process Theodicy.” Religious Studies 42(01): 3–26.

Dilley, Frank B. 2000. “A Finite God Reconsidered.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47: 29–41.

Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1994. “Alston and Hartshorne on the Concept of God.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36(3): 129–146.

Dorrien, Gary J. 2006. The Making of American Liberal Theology: Crisis, Irony, and Postmodernity, 1950–2005. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.

Dulles, Avery. 2005. “The Deist Minimum.” First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life 149: 25–30.

Ehrman, Bart D. 2008. God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question—Why We Suffer. New York: Harper Collins.

Frankenberry, Nancy. 1981. “Some Problems in Process Theodicy.” Religious Studies 17(02): 79–197.

Giannetti, Jason. 2008. “Richard Dawkins: Vox Populi.” The Journal of Liberal Religion 8(1).

Grasso, Christopher. 2008. “Deist Monster: On Religious Common Sense in the Wake of the American Revolution.” Journal of American History 95(1): 43–68.

Griffin, David Ray. 2004. God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theodicy. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.

Griffin, David Ray. 2001. “Process Philosophy of Religion.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Issues in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion 50(1/3): 131–151.;

Hartshorne, Charles. 1984. Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Hick, John H. 2007. Evil and the God of Love. New York: Palgrave.

———. 1990. Philosophy of Religion. Fourth Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1989 [1893]. Evolution and Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Levine, Michael P. 1994. “Pantheism, Theism and the Problem of Evil.” International Journal For Philosophy of Religion 35(3): 129–151.

Linford, Daniel. 2016. “Early-Modern Irreligion and Theological Analogy: A Response to GavinHyman’s A Short History of Atheism.” Secularism and Nonreligion 5.

Linford, Daniel and William R. Patterson. 2015. “God, Geography, and Justice.” Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 23(2): 189–216.

Manning, Rachel, Mark Levine and Alan Collins. 2007. “The Kitty Genovese Murder and the Social Psychology of Helping: The Parable of the 38 Witnesses.” American Psychologist 62(6): 555–562.

Martin, Michael. 1990. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Mill, John Stuart. 1998 [1874]. “Nature.” Three Essays on Religion. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

Mossner, Ernest Campbell. 1967. “Deism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards.Volumes 1 and 2. New York: 326–336.

Patterson, William R. 2005. “The Greatest Good for the Most Fit? John Stuart Mill, Thomas Henry Huxley, and Social Darwinism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 36(1): 72–84.

Spinoza, Benedictus. 1997. [1677]. Ethics. Rutland, VT: J.M. Dent.

Stenmark, Mikael. 2015. “Competing Conceptions of God: The Personal God versus the God Beyond Being.” Religious Studies 51(2): 205–220.

Thiel, John E. 2002. God, Evil, and Innocent Suffering: A Theological Reflection. New York: Crossroad.

Whelan, Ruth. 1992. “From Christian Apologetics to Enlightened Deism: The Case of Jacques Abbadie (1656–1727).” Modern Language Review 87(1): 32–40.

Whitehead, Alfred North. 1978 [1929]. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology, edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: The Free Press. Kindle Version.

Wieman, Henry Nelson. 1969. “Transendence and ‘Cosmic Consciousness.’” In Transcendence, edited by Herbert W. Richardson and Donald R. Cutler. Boston, MA: Beacon.