Item Details

Regulating civil mediation in England and wales: towards a 'win-win' outcome

Issue: Vol 2 No. 1 (2017)

Journal: Mediation Theory and Practice

Subject Areas:

DOI: 10.1558/mtp.31937


Civil mediation in Britain has rapidly moved away from being an option, for private choice, to becoming increasingly a compulsory or near-compulsory part of the public justice system. But regulation of the mediation industry remains minimal and undertaken on an essentially private, self-regulatory basis. This raises a perception or actuality of risk that mediation and its regulation may better serve the interests of stakeholders in the mediation industry than the individual citizen who may come to mediation as a one-off player with no available alternative dispute resolution mechanism. This article argues that there are ‘public interest’ values and expectations of a constitutional and democratic nature at stake here which require recognition and protection via an effective regulatory regime. It concludes that such a solution may in reality serve the interests both of the mediation industry and those individuals who may come into contact with it, offering a ‘win-win’ outcome.

Author: Mike Whitehouse

View Original Web Page

References :

Alexander, N. (2008) Mediation and the art of regulation. QUT Law Review 8(1):
BIS (2014) Alternative Dispute Resolution for Consumers: Government Response to
the Consultation on Implementing the Alternative Dispute Resolution Directive
and the Online Dispute Resolution Regulation. London: Department for Business,
Innovation and Skills. BIS/14/1122. Retrieved on 12 September 2016 from www.
Boon, A., Earle, R. and Whyte, A. (2007) Regulating mediators? Legal Ethics 10: 26.
Briggs, M. (2016) Affordable dispute resolution for all: a reform case study.
Tom Sargant Memorial Lecture 2016. Retrieved on 29 November 2016 from
CMC (2013) Registration of individual mediators and mediation training courses.
Document for CMC AGM, December. Unpublished.
CMC (2015) Civil Mediation Council plays a key role in establishing All Party
Parliamentary Group. Press release, 25 November. Retrieved on 12 September
2016 from
CMC (2016) All Party Parliamentary Group on ADR. Retrieved on 12 September
2016 from
Dezalay, Y. (1998) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the
Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (2nd edn). Chicago, IL: University
of Chicago Press.
Feintuck, M. (2004) ‘The Public Interest’ in Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University
Fouzder, M. (2016) Briggs: online court will take the A out of ADR. Law Society
Gazette (26 September). Retrieved on 29 November 2016 from https://www.
Fuller, L. (1970) Mediation – its form and functions. Southern California Law
Review 44: 305.
Genn, H. (2010) Judging Civil Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Health and Care Professions Council (2016) Regulation of further groups. Retrieved
on 12 September 2016 from
Hinshaw, A. (2012) Regulating the rogue mediator. Retrieved on 12 September 2016
Jackson Review (2010) Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Final Report. London: The
Stationery Office. Retrieved on 29 November 2016 from
Professional Standards Authority (2016) What we do. Retrieved on 12 September
2016 from
Roberts, M. (2005) Family Mediation: the development of the regulatory framework
in the UK. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22(4): 509–26.
Roberts, M. (2014) A–Z of Mediation. London: Palgrave.
Roberts, S. and Palmer, M. (2009) Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms
of Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, Lord Chief Justice (2016) Developing commercial law through the courts:
rebalancing the relationship between the courts and arbitration. Retrieved on
12 September 2016 from
Waldman, E. (ed.) (2011) Mediation Ethics: Cases and Commentaries. London: John
Wiley & Sons.
Woolf Report (1996) Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System
in England and Wales. London: HMSO.