References :

Birdsong, D. (ed.). (1999) Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. The International Review of Applied Linguistics 5: 161–70.

Dulay, H. and Burt, M. (1973) Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 23: 245–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x

Ellis, N. C. and Wulff, S. (2015) Usage-based approaches to second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition 75–93. New York: Routledge.

Ellis, R. (1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 305–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008159

Gass, S. M. and Mackey, A. (2015) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition 180–206. New York: Routledge.

Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y. and Novella, M. (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris and Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In P. Rebuschat (ed.) Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages 443–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo

Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2012) The acquisition of interpretable features in L2 Spanish: Personal a. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15: 701–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000144

Keating, G., VanPatten, B. and Jegerski, J. (2011) Who was walking on the beach? Anaphora resolution in Spanish heritage speakers and adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 193–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000732

Kessler, J.-U., Liebner, M. and Mansouri, F. (2011). Teaching. In M. Pienemann and J.-U. Kessler (eds) Studying Processability Theory 149–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Complexity theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition 227–44. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2015.03.026

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. H. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.

Leonetti, M. (2004) Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3: 75–114.

Lightbown, P. (1983) Exploring relationships between developmental and instructional sequences in L2 acquisition. In H. Seliger and M. H. Long (eds) Classroom-centered Research in Second Language Acquisition 217–43. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Loewen, S. (2015) Introduction to Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.

Loewen, S. and Sato, M. (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.

Long, M. H. (1983) Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly 17: 359–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586253

López, L. (2012) Indefinite Objects: Scrambling, Choice Functions, and Differential Marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marsden, H., Whong, M. and Gil, K.-H. (in press) What’s in the textbook and what’s in the mind: Polarity item ‘any’ in learner English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263117000018

Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50: 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/
0023-8333.00136

O’Grady, W. (2015) Processing determinism. Language Learning 65: 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12091

Pienemann, M. (1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10: 52–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52

Pienemann, M. (1998) Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15

Rothman, J. (2010) Theoretical linguistics meets pedagogical practice: Pronominal subject use in Spanish as a second language as an example. Hispania 93: 52–65.

Schmidt, R. W. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 129–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schumann. J. (1978) The Pidginization Process: A Model for Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Selinker, L. (1972) Interlanguage. The International Review of Applied Linguistics 10: 209–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Sharwood Smith, M. and Truscott, J. (2014) The Multilingual Mind: A Modular Processing Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shin, N. L. and Cairns, H. S. (2009) Subject pronouns in child Spanish and continuity of reference. In J. Collentine, M. García, B. Lafford and F. M. Marín (eds) Selected Proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 155–64. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Sorace, A. (2003) Near-nativeness. In C. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds) The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 130–51. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch6

Spada, N. and Tomita, Y. (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60: 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x

Swain, M. (1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass and C. Madden (eds) Input in Second Language Acquisition 235–53. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Swain, M. (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, and J. Williams (eds) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 64–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Truscott, J. (1998) Noticing in second language acquisition: a critical review. Second Language Research 14: 103–35. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898674803209

VanPatten, B. (2004) On the role(s) of input and output in making form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott and M. Overstreet (eds) Form-­meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition 29–47. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

VanPatten, B. (2015) Foundations of processing instruction. IRAL 53: 91–109.

VanPatten, B. (2016) Why explicit knowledge cannot become implicit knowledge. Foreign Language Annals 49: 650–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12226

VanPatten, B. (2017) While we’re on the topic … BVP on Language, Language Acquisition, and Classroom Practice. Alexandria, VA: The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.

VanPatten, B. and Cadierno, T. (1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 225–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011979

VanPatten, B. and Rothman, J. (2014) Against ‘rules’. In A. Benati, C. Laval and M. J. Arche (eds) The Grammar Dimension in Instructed Second Language Acquisition: Theory, Research, and Practice 15–35. London: Bloomsbury.

VanPatten, B. and Smith, M. (2015) Aptitude as grammatical sensitivity and the initial stages of learning Japanese as an L2: parametric variation and case marking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 37: 135–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263114000813

VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (eds) (2015) Theories in Second Language Acquisition (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.

White, L. (2003) Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065

White, L. (2016). Pro-drop then and now: changing perspectives on null subjects in second language acquisition. In A. Alba de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela and C. Martínez-Sanz (eds) Language Acquisition Beyond Parameters: Studies in Honour of Juana M. Liceras 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.51.02whi