Learning from Zu˜ni war gods Repatriating alternative dispute resolution for practice and research
Issue: Vol 2 No. 2 (2017)
Journal: Mediation Theory and Practice
Subject Areas:
DOI: 10.1558/mtp.34015
Abstract:
This article applies lessons learned from the Zu˜ni people of the southwestern United States about successful and sustainable intervention as a metaphor to address common tensions among alternative dispute resolution (ADR) scholars and practitioners. These tensions are found in professionalisation, institutionalisation and identification of best practices. Through example of Zu˜ni efforts to repatriate sacred artefacts known as Ahuy: da, I argue that ADR is an intervention that works best through direct and ongoing dialogue rather than rigid adherence to a set of standards. The problem lies in how such adherence can limit and distort rather than inform or support best practices in research as well as mediation practice. I propose qualitative, ethnographic field research as a way to address this problem, and provide an example from ongoing study of a US family court mediation programme.
Author: Alexandra Crampton
References :
Adams, W. (1998) The philosophical roots of anthropology. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Alfini, J., Barkai, J., Bush, R. Hermann, M., Hyman, J. Kovach, K., Liebman, C., Press, S., and L. Riskin. (1994) What happens when mediation is institutionalised? Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 307-332.
Amato, P., Kane, J. & Spencer, James. (2011) Reconsidering the ‘Good Divorce.’ Family Relations 60:511-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00666.x
Ballard, R., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Applegate, A., and D’Onofrio, B. (2011) Factors affecting the outcome of divorce and paternity mediations. Family Court Review 49(1): 16-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01350.x
Bernard, H.R. (2002) Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burawoy, M. (2003) Revisits: An Outline of a Theory of Reflexive Ethnography. American Sociological Review 68(5): 645-679. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1519757
Coben, J. (2006) Intentional conversations about the globalization of ADR. Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy 27: 217-227.
Coy, P. G., and Hedeen, T. (2005) A stage model of social movement co‐optation: Community mediation in the United States. The Sociological Quarterly 46(3): 405-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00020.x
Dingwall, R. (2010) Divorce mediation: should we change our mind? Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law 32(2): 107-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2010.506307
Dingwall, R. and Kidd, K. (2003). After the Fall...: Capitulating to the Routine in Professional Work. Penn St. L. Rev. 108, 67-89.
Emery, R. (2012) Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. 2nd edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
Ferguson, T. J., Anyon, R. and Ladd, E. J. (2000) Repatriation at the Pueblo of Zuni: diverse solutions to complex problems. Repatriation reader: who owns American Indian remains 282-291. Omaha: University of Nebraska Press.
Fineman, M. (1991) The illusion of equality: The rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greatbatch and Dingwall, R. (1999) The marginalization of domestic violence in divorce mediation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 13(2): 174-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/13.2.174
Grillo, T. (1991) The mediation alternative: Process dangers for women. The Yale Law Journal 100(6): 1545-1610. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/796781
Harrington, C. B., and Merry, S. E. (1988) Ideological production: The making of community mediation. Law and Society Review 22(4): 709-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3053707
Johnson, J. (2001) Contaminated Collections: Preservation, Access, and Use. In Special Proceedings Volume) Collection Forum 17(1-2): 1-127.
Mayer, B. (2013) Mediation: 50 Years of creative conflict. Family Court Review. 51(1): 34-41: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12005
McAdoo, B., and N. A. Welsh. (2004) Look before you leap and keep on looking: lessons from the institutionalization of court-connected mediation. Nevada Law Journal 5: 399-432.
Merenstein, A. (1992) The Zuni quest for repatriation of the war gods: An alternative basis for claim. American Indian Law Review 71(2): 589-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20062567
Merry, S. (1990) Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Murphy, J. and Singer, J. (2015) Divorced from reality: Rethinking family dispute resolution. New York: New York University Press.
Nader, L. (1993) Controlling processes in the practice of law: Hierarchy and pacification in the movement to reform dispute ideology. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 9: 1-25.
Patton, B. (1984) On teaching negotiation. Program on Negotiation Working Paper, Harvard Law School (updated in 2000 with commentary and included as a chapter in Teaching negotiation: Ideas and innovations, edited by M. Wheeler. Cambridge, MA: PON Books.
Press, S. (2013) Family Court services: A reflection on 50 years of contributions. Family Court Review 51(1): 48-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12007
Redmond, B. (2004) Reflection in Action: Developing reflective practice in health and social services. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.
Salem, P. (2009) The emergence of triage in family court services: The beginning of the end for mandatory mediation? Family Court Review Vol. 47(3): 371-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01262.x
Saposnek, D. (2004) Commentary: The future of the history of family mediation research. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 22(1-2): 37-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/crq.91
Schneider, A. K. (2012) Foreword: The Future of Court ADR: Mediation and Beyond. Marquette Law Review 95(3): 12-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804074-4.00015-7
Schön, D. (1983) The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York: Basic Books.
Silbey, S. (1993) Mediation Mythology. Negotiation Journal. 9(4): 349-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1993.tb00722.x
Singer, J. (2008) Dispute resolution and the post-divorce family: Implications of a paradigm shift. Family Court Review 47(3): 363-370.
Staller, K. (2006) Railroads, runaways, and researchers: Returning evidence rhetoric to its practice base. Qualitative Inquiry. 12(3): 503-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286524
Stokoe, E. (2011) Simulated interaction and communication skills training: The ‘conversation-analytic role-play method’. In C. Antaki (ed.) Applied Conversation Analysis 119-139. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Suro, R. (1990) Zunis' Effort to Regain Idols May Alter Views of Indian Art. NY Times, Aug 13, A1 and A13.
Trinder, L. and Kellett, J. (2007) Fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in court-based dispute resolution schemes in England. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21(3): 323–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm009
Welsh, N. A. (2011) Current transitional state of court-connected ADR. Marquette Law Review 95(3): 873–86.