Item Details

No fear of George Kinglsley Zipf: Language classroom, statistics and Universal Grammar

Issue: Vol 2 No. 2 (2018) Special Issue: Second Language Teaching and Generative Linguistics

Journal: Instructed Second Language Acquisition

Subject Areas:

DOI: 10.1558/isla.37291

Abstract:

This paper offers a new insight into GenSLA classroom research in light of recent developments in the Minimalist Program (MP). Recent research in GenSLA has shown how generative linguistics and acquisition studies can inform the language classroom, mostly focusing on what linguistic aspects of target properties should be integrated as a part of the classroom input. Based on insights from Chomsky’s «three factors for language design» - which bring together the Faculty of Language, input and  general principles of economy and efficient computation (the third factor effect) for language development -  we put forward a theoretical rationale for how classroom research can offer a unique environment to test the learnability in L2 through the statistical enhancement of the input to which learners are exposed.

Author: Stefano Rastelli, Kook-Hee Gil

View Original Web Page

References :

Andersen, R. W. and Shirai, Y. (1996) The primacy of Aspect in first and second language acquisition: the pidgin/creole connection. In C. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (eds) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 527–70. New York: Academic Press.

Bavelier, D., Shawn Green, C. and Dye, M. W. G. (2009) Exercising your brain: training-related brain plasticity. In M. C. Gazzaniga (ed.) The Cognitive Neurosciences (4th edn) 153–64. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.

Biberauer, T. (2017) Factors 2 and 3: a principled approach. In C. Song and J. Baker (eds) Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics (COPiL) 10: 38–65. Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge.

Bley-Vroman, R. (2002) Frequency in production, comprehension and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 209–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310200205X

Bley-Vroman, R. (2009) The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31: 175–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090275

Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2013a) Why theory and research are important for the practice of teaching. In J. W. Schwieter (ed.) Innovative Research Practices in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism 85–106. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2013b) Word Order in Spanish: Lexico-Semantics and Pragmatics. Paper presented at special workshop: Applying Generative SLA to the Language Classroom, GASLA 12 (Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition). University of Florida.

Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program. Boston: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2000a) The Architecture of Language. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N. (2000b) New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811937

Chomsky, N. (2002) On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613876

Chomsky, N. (2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655

Chomsky, N. (2007a) The biology of the language faculty: its perfection, past and future. Conference held at MIT, Boston, 19 October 2007. https://vimeo.com/20565201

Chomsky, N. (2007b) Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland and H. M. Gärtner (eds) Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics 1–30. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Chomsky, N. (2009) Opening remarks. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini, J. Uriagereka and P. Salaburu (eds) Of Minds and Language. A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country 13–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N. (2012) The Science of Language. Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061018

Chomsky, N. (2013) Problems of projections. Lingua 130: 33–9 https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.lingua.2012.12.003

Chomsky, N. (2014) Some core contested concepts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9331-5

Chomsky, N. (2017) Language architecture and its import for evolution. Neuroscience and Behavioral Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiorev.2017.01.053

Davidson, D. and Indefrey, P. (2011) Error-related activity and correlates of grammatical plasticity. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 219–45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00219

De Bot, K. (2014) Moving where? A reaction to Slabakova et al. (2014). Applied Linguistics 36(2): 261–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu074

Ellis, N. and Collins, L. (2009) Input and second language acquisition: the roles of frequency, form, and function. Introduction to the Special Issue. Modern Language Journal 93(3): 329–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x

Gil, K.-H., Marsden, H. and Whong, M. (2013) Can explicit grammar instruction serve as evidence for L2 grammar restructuring? In S. Stavarakaki, P. Konstantinopoulou and M. Lalioti (eds) Advances in Language Acquisition 328–36. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Gil, K.-H., Marsden, H. and Whong, M. (2017) The meaning of negation in the second language classroom: evidence from ‘any’. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817740144

Hirakawa, M. (2013) Alterations and argument structure in second language English: knowledge of two types of intrasitive verbs. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil and H. Marsden (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom 117–37. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_7

Hirakawa, M., Shibuya, M. and Endo, M (2017) Explicit instruction, input flood or study abroad: which helps Japanese learners of English acquire adjective ordering? Special Issue of Language Teaching Research on Grammatical Meaning and the Second Language Classroom. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817752377

Ionin, T., Ko, H. and Wexler, K. (2004) Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12: 3–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1201_2

Ionin, T., Zubizarreta, M. L. and Philippov, V. (2009) Acquisition of article semantics by child and adult L2 English learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12: 337–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990149

Ionin, T., Montrul, S., Kim J. H. and Philippov, V. (2011) Genericity distinctions and the interpretation of determiners in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition 18: 242–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2011.610264

Krashen, S. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition, Ch. 2, 9–56. London: Pergamon.

Leal, T., Slabakova, R. and Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2015) Rumors of UG’s demise have been greatly exaggerated. A reply to de Bot. Applied Linguistics 36(2): 265–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv007

Long, D. and Rothman, J. (2013) Generative approaches and the competing systems hypothesis: formal acquisition to pedagogical application. In J. W. Schwieter (ed.) Innovative Research Practices in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism 63–84. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Long, M. (2017) Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA). Geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. ISLA 1(1): 7–44.

Lopez, E. (2017) Teaching the English article system: definiteness and specificity in linguistically-informed instruction. Special Issue of Language Teaching Research on Grammatical Meaning and the Second Language Classroom. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739649

Newmeyer, F. (2003) Grammar is grammar and usage is usage. Language 79(4): 682–707. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0260

O’Grady, W. (2012) Three factors in the design and acquisition of language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review of Cognitive Science 3(5): 493–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1188

Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R. and Edelman, S. (2008a) Learn locally, act globally: Learning language from variation set cues. Cognition 109(3): 423–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.cognition.2008.10.004

Onnis, L., Waterfall, H. R. and Edelman, S. (2008b) Variation sets facilitate artificial language learning. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. http://kybele.psych.cornell.edu/~edelman/OnnisWaterfallEdelman-variation-sets-CogSci08.pdf

Oshita, H. (2000) What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: a corpus study of passive unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16: 293–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830001600401

Paradis, M. (2004) A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.18

Rankin, T. and Unsworth, S. (2016) Beyond poverty: engaging with input in generative SLA. Second Language Research 32(4): 563–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316648732

Rastelli, S. (2014) Discontinuity in Second Language Acquisition. The Shift between Statistical and Grammatical Learning. Bristol-Buffalo: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092475

Rastelli, S. (2016) Neurolinguistics and second language teaching. A view from the crossroads. Second Language Research 34(1): 103–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/
0267658316681377

Rastelli, S. (in press) The discontinuity model: statistical and grammatical learning in adult second language acquisition. Language Acquisition.

Schwartz, B. (1993) On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behaviour. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15: 147–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011931

Shtyrov, Y., Nikulin, V. and Pulvermüller, F. (2010) Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. Journal of Neuroscience 30: 16864–7. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1376-10.2010

Slabakova, R. (2001) Telicity in the Second Language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.26

Slabakova, R. (2008) Meaning in the Second Language. New York/Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211511

Slabakova, R. (2013) What is easy and what is hard in second language acquisition: a generative perspective. In M. D. P. García Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez-Mangado, and M. Martínez Adrián (eds) Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition 5–28. (AILA Applied Linguistics Series, Vol. 9). Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

Slabakova, R. (to appear) The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated. In M. Rispoli and T. Ionin (eds) Selected Proceedings from the 7th GALANA Conference. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.

Slabakova R., Leal, T. L. and Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2014) We have moved on: current concepts and positions in generative SLA. Applied Linguistics 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu027

Snape, N., and Yusa, N. (2013) Explicit article instruction in definiteness, specificity, genericity and perception. In M. Whong, K. H. Gil and H. Marsden (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom 161–82. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_9

Snape, N., Umeda, M., Wiltshier, J. and Yusa, N. (2016) Teaching the complexities of English article use and choice for generics to L2 learners. In D. Stringer, J. Garrett, B. Halloran and S. Mossman (eds) Proceedings of the 13th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA2015) 208–22. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Sorace, A. (2000) Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76: 859–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/417202

Sorace, A. (2011) Pinning down the concept of interface in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor

Sorace, A. and Filiaci, F. (2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22: 339–68. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658306sr271oa

Sorace, A., and Shomura, Y. (2001) Lexical constraints on the acquisition of split intransitivity: evidence from L2 Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 247–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101002066

Teixeira, J. (2016) (Re)thinking the interface hypothesis and its implication for language teaching. In T. Harrison, U. Lanvers and M. Edwardes (eds) Breaking Theory: New Directions in Applied Linguistics 93–109. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics. London: Scitsiugnil Press.

Trahey, M. (1996) Positive evidence in second language acquisition: some long term effects. Second Language Research 12(2): 111–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200201

Trahey, M. and White, L. (1993) Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(2): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011955

Ullman, M.T. and Lovelett J.T (2016) Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316675195

Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N. and Wiltshier, J. (2017) The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Special Issue of Language Teaching Research on Grammatical Meaning and the Second Language Classroom. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817739648

VanPatten, B. and Rothman, J. (2015) What does current generative theory have to say about the explicit-implicit debate? In P. Rebuschat (ed.) Implicit and Explicit learning of Languages. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.05van

Valenzuela, E. and McCormack, B. (2013) The syntax-discourse interface and the interface between generative theory and pedagogical approaches to SLA. In M. Whong, K.-H. Gil and H. Marsden (eds) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom 101–13. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6362-3_6

White, L. (1991) Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7(2): 133–61.

Whong, M., Gil, K.-H. and Marsden, H. (eds) (2013) Universal Grammar and the Second Language Classroom. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/
978-94-007-6362-3

Whong, M., Gil, K.-H. and Marsden, H. (2014) Beyond paradigm: second language acquisition and the language classroom. Second Language Research 30(4): 551–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314526749

Wulff, S., Ellis, N., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K. and LeBlanc, C. (2009) The acquisition of tense-aspect: converging evidence from corpora, cognition, and learner constructions. Modern Language Journal 93: 354–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.
2009.00895.x

Yang, C. (2010) Three factors in language variation. Lingua 120(5): 1060–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.015

Yang, C. and Roeper, T. (2011). Minimalism and language acquisition. In C. Boeckx (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Minimalism 551–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yang, C., Crain, S., Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N. and Bolhuis, J. J. (2017) The growth of language: universal grammar, experience and principles of computation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. http://dx.doi.org/j.neubiorev.2016.12.023