Investigating teachers’ perceptions of syntactic complexity in L2 academic writing
This paper aims to investigate how L2 teachers perceive syntactic complexity in L2 writing, and to what extent teachers’ judgements are related to current theoretical views. The main reason for conducting the study is that the majority of studies that have investigated the development of syntactic complexity in L2 have been grounded in hypothesis-testing research; few studies, however, have explored whether teachers’ perspectives on syntactic complexity reflect the development of syntactic complexity as hypothesised in the SLA literature. Two groups of language teachers (eleven of L2-Dutch and sixteen of L2-Italian) were asked to evaluate individually the syntactic complexity of a sample of argumentative texts written by L2 university students of, respectively, Dutch and Italian. In the panel discussion that followed, teachers discussed their motivation behind their assigned scores and the feedback they had proposed. The results revealed that teachers tended to focus primarily on accuracy and comprehensibility. When their comments were concerned with syntactic complexity, both similarities and differences (related to target language and writing context) emerged between Dutch and Italian. Teachers’ reflections appeared to be only partly aligned with existing theoretical views on syntactic complexity.
Author: Folkert Kuiken, Ineke Vedder
Ait Eljoudi, O. (2018) Algerian teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about learner autonomy. In J. Mackay, M. Birello and D. Xerri (eds) ELT Research in Action. Bridging the Gap between Research and Classroom Practice 65–70. Kent: IATEFL.
Block, D. (2000) Revisiting the gap between SLA researchers and language teachers. Links and Letters 7: 129–43.
Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Ellis, R. (2003) Task-based Language Teaching and Learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I. and Gilabert, R. (2010) Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In I. Bartning, M. Martin and I. Vedder (eds) Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research 81–99. EUROSLA Monographs Series, Volume 1. Amsterdam: European Second Language Association.
Lambert, C. and Kormos, J. (2014) Complexity, accuracy and fluency in task-based L2 research: toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 35(5): 607–14.
Mackay, J., Birello, M. and Xerri, D. (2017) Bridging the Gap between Research and Classroom Practice. Kent: IATEFL.
Pallotti, G. (2017) Applying the interlanguage approach to language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 55(4): 393–412.
Polio, C. and Yoon, H. J. (2018) The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28(2): 165–88.
Robinson, P. (2001) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: a triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction 287–318. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2011) Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In P. Robinson (ed.) Second Language Task Complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of Second Language Learning and Performance 3–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. and Kim, H.-Y. (1998) Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.