References :

Allon, Mark and Richard Salomon. 2010. ‘New Evidence for Mahāyāna in Early Gandhāra’. Eastern Buddhist 41(1): 1–22.

Apple, James B. 2014. ‘The Phrase dharmaparyāyo hastagato in Mahāyāna Buddhist literature: Rethinking the Cult of the Book in Middle Period Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism’. Journal of American Oriental Society 134(1): 25–50. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.134.1.0025

Bailey, H. W. 1982. ‘Two Kharoṣṭhī Inscriptions’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 114(2): 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00159192

Bareau, André. 1960. ‘La construction et la culte des stūpa d’après les Vinayapiṭaka’. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extréme Orient 50(2): 229–274. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.1962.1534

Baums, Stefan. 2018. ‘A Framework for Gandhāran Chronology based on Relic Inscriptions’. In Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art, edited by Wannaporn Riejang and Peter Stewart, 53–71. Oxford: Archeopress Publishing.

Baums, Stefan and Andrew Glass. 2012. A Dictionary of Gāndhārī. http://gandhari.org/dictionary.

Baums, Stefan, Arlo Griffith, Ingo Strauch and Vincent Tournier. 2016. ‘Early Inscriptions of Āndhradeśa: Results of fieldwork in January and February 2016’. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 102: 355–398. https://doi.org/10.3406/befeo.2016.6238

Bentor, Yael. 1988. ‘The Redactions of the Adbhutadharmaparyāya from Gilgit’. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 11(2): 21–52.

———. 1995. ‘On the Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics and Dhāraṇīs in Stūpas and Images’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 115(2): 248–261. https://doi.org/10.2307/604668

Bhattacharya, G. 1987. ‘Dāna-Deyadharma: Donation in Early Buddhist Records (in Brāhmī)’. In Investigating Indian Art: Proceedings of a Symposium on the Development and Early Buddhist and Hindu Iconography Held at the Museum of Indian Art Berlin in May 1986, edited by Marianne Yaldiz and Wibke Lobo, 39–60. Berlin: Museum für Indische Kunst, Staatliche Museen Preussischer Kulturbesitz.

Boucher, Daniel. 1991. ‘The Pratītyasamutpādagātha and Its Role in the Medieval Cult of the Relics’. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 14(1): 1–27.

Collett, Alice. 2015. ‘Women as Teachers and Pupils in Early Buddhist Communities: The Evidence of Epigraphy’. Religions of South Asia 9(1): 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v9i1.29442

———. 2018. ‘Reimagining the Sātavāhana Queen Nāgaṇṇikā’. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 41: 329–358.

———. (forthcoming). Women in Early Historic India: The Changing Political Landscape.

Collins, Steven. 1993. ‘Nirvāṇa, Time and Narrative’. History of Religions 31(3): 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1086/463283

———. 1998. Nirvana and Other Buddhist Felicities: Utopias of the Pali imaginaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520655

Cook, Francis, H. 1975. ‘Nirvāṇa’. In Buddhism: A Modern Perspective, edited by Charles Prebish, 133–136. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Cousins, L. S. 2003. ‘Sākiyabhikkhu/Sakyabhikkhu/Śākyabhikṣu: A Mistaken Link to Mahāyāna?’ Nagoya Studies in Indian Culture and Buddhism: Saṃbhāṣā 23: 1–27.

DeCaroli, Robert. 2015. Image Problems: The Origin and Development of the Buddha’s Image in Early South Asia. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Dehejia, Vidya. 1992. ‘The Collective and Popular Basis of Early Buddhist Patronage: Sacred Monuments, 100 BC–AD 250’. In The Power of Art: Patronage in Indian Culture, edited by Barbara Stoler Miller, 35–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drewes, David. 2009. ‘Early Indian Mahāyāna 1: Recent Scholarship’. Religious Compass 4(2): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00195.x

Falk, Harry. 2008. ‘Another Reliquary Vase from Wardak and Consecrating Fire Rites in Gandhāra’. In Religion and Art: New Issues in Indian Iconography and Iconology, edited by C. Bautze-Picron, vol. 1, 63–80. London: The British Association for South Asian Studies/The British Library.

Gummer, Natalie. 2015. ‘Survarṇabhāsottamasūtra’. In Brill’s Encyclopedia of Buddhism, Volume 1, edited by Jonathan Silk, Oskar von Hinüber and Vincent Eltschinger, 246–60. Leiden: Brill.

———. (in press). ‘Translating the Buddha’s Body’. In Translating Buddhism: Historical and Contextual Perspectives, edited by Alice Collett. New York: State University of New York Press.

———. (forthcoming a). ‘Texts and Rituals’. In the Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Practice, edited by Paula Arai and Kevin Trainor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (forthcoming b). Performing the Buddha’s Body.

Gupta, Vinay Kumar and Monika Zin. 2016. ‘Parinirvāṇa Representations in the Art of Mathura: A Study based on the Discovery of a Unique Parinirvāṇa Stele from the Varāha Temple of Mathura’. In Art of the Orient 5, edited by D. Kaminska-Jones and
A. Staszczyk, 37–60. Torun: Adam Marszalek.

Habata, Hiromi. 2015. ‘The City of Nirvāṇa: Conceptions of Nirvāṇa with Special Reference to the Central Asian Tradition’. The Eastern Buddhist 46(2): 61–84.

Hallisey, Charles. 2015. Therigatha: Poems of the First Buddhist Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hardy, E., ed. 1899. The Aṅguttata-nikāya, Vol. IV. Oxford: The Pali Text Society.

Harvey, Peter. 2011. ‘An Analysis of Factors related to the kusala/akusala Quality of Actions in the Pāli Tradition’. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 33(1–2): 175–209.

von Hinüber, Oskar. 2003. Beiträge zur Erklärung der Senavarma-Inschrift. [Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Mainz. Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Jg 2003, Nr. 1]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Jamison, Stephanie W. 1984. ‘The Vedic Passive Optative and its functional equivalents: A study in the syntax of the Gerundive’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 104(4): 609–620. https://doi.org/10.2307/601895

Jongeward, David, Elizabeth Errington, Richard Salomon, and Stefan Baums. 2012. Gandharan Buddhist Reliquaries. Seattle, WA: Early Buddhist Manuscripts Project.

Keyes, Charles F. 1983. ‘Merit-transference in the Kammic Theory of Popular Theravāda Buddhism’. In Karma: An Anthropological Inquiry, edited by Charles F. Keyes and
E. Valentine Daniel, 261–286. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kinnard, Jacob. 1999. Imagining Wisdom: Seeing and Knowing in the Art of Indian Buddhism. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824429

Konow, Sten. 1929a. Kharoshṭhī Inscriptions with the Exception of Those of Aśoka. Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum 2.2. Calcutta: Government of India: Central Publication Branch.

———. 1929b. ‘Remarks on a Kharosthī Inscription from the Kurram Valley’. In Indian Studies in Honour of Charles Rockwell Lanman, 53–67. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

———. 1931–1932. ‘Kalawan Copper-Plate Inscription of the Year 134’. Epigraphia Indica 21: 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00153754

Lilley, Mary E., ed. 1925–27. The Apadāna, Parts I & II. London: Pali Text Society.

Longhurst, A. H. 1938. The Buddhist Antiquities of Nāgārjunakoṇḍa, Madras Presidency. Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India No. 54. New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.

McCombs, Jason Matthew. 2014. Mahāyāna and the Gift: Theories and Practices. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

McDermott, James P. 1974. ‘Sādhīna Jātaka: A Case against the Transfer of Merit’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 94(3): 385–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/600073

Monier-Williams, M. 1899. A Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Morris, Richard, ed. 1888. The Aṅguttara-nikāya, Vol. II. Oxford: The Pali Text Society.

Norman, K. R., trans. 1969/1971. The Elders’ Verses I. Theragāthā. The Elders’ Verses II. Therīgāthā. London: Luzac.

Pargiter, F. E. 1913. ‘A Copperplate discovered at Kasia, the Buddha’s Deathplace’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 45(1): 51–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X0004418X

Radich, Michael. 2007. The Somatics of Liberation: Ideas about Embodiment in Buddhism from Its Origins to the Fifth Century CE. Unpublished PhD thesis, Harvard University.

———. 2015. The Mahāparinirvāṇa-mahāsūtra and the Emergence of Tathāgatagarbha Doctrine. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.

Rienjang, Wannaporn Kay. 2013. ‘Bodily Relics in Gandharan Stupas’. Gandhāran Studies 7: 1–10.

Rosen Stone, Elisabeth. 1994. The Buddhist Art of Nāgārjunakoṇḍa. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.

Salomon, Richard. 1986. ‘The Inscription of Senavarma, King of Oḍi’. Indo-Iranian Journal 29(4): 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1163/000000086790082398

———. 1996. ‘An inscribed silver Buddhist reliquary of the time of King Kharaosta and Prince Indravarman’. Journal of the American Oriental Society 116(3): 418–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/605147

———. 1998. Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Sanskrit, Prakrit and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2007. ‘Dynastic and Institutional Connections in the Pre- and Early Kuṣāṇa Period: New Manuscript and Epigraphic Evidence’. In On the Cusp of an Era: Art in the Pre-Kuṣāṇa World, edited by Doris Meth Srinivasan, 267–286. Brill’s Inner Asian Library 18. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004154513.i-548.90

Salomon, Richard and Gregory Schopen. 2002. ‘On an Alleged Reference to Amitābha in a Kharoṣṭhī Inscription on a Gandhārian Relief’. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 25(1–2): 3–32.

Schopen, Gregory. 1975. ‘The Phrase sa pṛthivīpradeśaś caityabhūto bhavet in the Vajracchedikā: Notes on the Cult of the Book in Mahāyāna’. Indo-Iranian Journal 17: 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1163/000000075790079574

———. 1979. ‘Mahāyāna in Indian Inscriptions’. Indo-Iranian Journal 21: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/000000079790080299

———. 2004. Buddhist Monks and Business Matters: Still more Papers on Monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

———. 2005. Figments and Fragments of Mahāyāna Buddhism in India: More Collected Papers. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

Schmithausen, Lambert. 2000. ‘Zur zwölfgliedrigen Formel des Entstehens in Abhängigkeit.’ Hōrin, Vergleichende Studien zur japanischen Kultur 7: 4–76.

Seyfort Ruegg, David. 2005. ‘The Kalawān Copper-Plate Inscription: Early Evidence of Mahāyāna-type Thinking?’ Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 28(1): 3–9

Shimoda, Masahiro. 1997. Nehon gyō no kenkyū: Daijōkyōten no kenkyū hōhō shiron (A Study of the Mahāparinirvāṇasūtra). Tokyo: Shinjōsha.

———. 2003. ‘Stūpa Worship as Historical Background to Tathāgatagarbha Theory: As Suggested by Several Seemingly Irrelevant Texts’. In Mori Sodō hakase shōju kinen ronbunshū 森祖道博士頌寿記念論文集, edited by the Mori Sodō Hakushi Shōju Kinen Ronbunshū Kankōkai 森祖道 博士頌寿記念論文集刊行会, 247–258. Hamamatsu: Kokusai Bukkyōto kyōkai.

Shizutani, Masao. 1962. ‘Mahayana Inscriptions in the Gupta Period’. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies (Indogaku Bukkyogaku Kenkyu) 10(1): 358–355. https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.10.358

Skilling, Peter. 2008. ‘New Discoveries from South India: The life of the Buddha at Phanigiri, Andhra Pradesh’. Arts Asiatiques 63(1): 96–118. https://doi.org/10.3406/arasi.2008.1664

Skilling, Peter and Oskar von Hinüber. 2011. ‘An Epigraphical Buddhist Poem from Phanigiri (Andhrapradesh)’. Annual Report for the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology 14: 7–12.

Sircar, D. C. 1963–1964. ‘More Inscriptions from Nāgārjunakoṇḍa’. Epigraphia Indica 35: 1–36.

———. 1965. Select Inscriptions bearing on Indian History and Civilization. Vol. 1. From the Sixth Century BC to the Sixth Century AD. Calcutta: University of Calcutta.

Sircar, D. C. and K. G. Krishnan Ootacamund 1961–1962. ‘Two Inscriptions from Nāgārjunakoṇḍa’. Epigraphia Indica 34: 17–22.

Soudara Rajan, K. V. 2006. Nagarjunakonda (1954–60) (MASI no. 75 vol II) New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.

Strong, John. 2004. The Relics of the Buddha. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Subrahmanyam, R. 1975. Nagarjunakonda (1954–60) (MASI no. 75 vol I) New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India.

———. 1985. ‘On the Nature of Utilization of Epigraphs for Art History’. In Indian Epigraphy: Its Bearing on the History of Art, edited by Frederick M. Asher and G. S. Gai, 25–27. New Oxford: Oxford and IBH, and American Institute of Indian Studies.

Theratherīgāthā. Oldenberg, Hermann and Richard Pischel, eds. 1883. The Thera- and Therīgāthā: (Stanzas ascribed to Elders of the Buddhist Order of Recluses). Oxford: Pali Text Society.

Vogel, Jean P. 1908. ‘Note on Excavations at Kasia’. Archaeological Survey of India Annual Report 1904–1905, 43–58. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, India.

———. 1929–1930. ‘Prakrit Inscriptions from a Buddhist site at Nāgārjunakoṇḍa’. Epigraphia Indica 20: 1–36.

———. 1930–31. ‘Two Additional Inscriptions from Nāgārjunakoṇḍa’. Epigraphia Indica 21: 61–72.

Walters, Jonathan. 1997. ‘Stūpa, Story, and Empire: Constructions of the Buddha Biography in Early Post-Aśokan India. In Sacred Biography in the Buddhist Traditions of South and Southeast Asia, edited by Juliane Schober, 160–192. Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824864217-008

———. 2018. Legends of the Buddhist Saints: Apadānapāli. www.apadanatranslation.org

Williams, Paul. 1989. Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. London: Routledge.

Willis, Michael. 2000. Buddhist Reliquaries from Ancient India. London: Published for the Trustees of the British Museum by British Museum Press.

———. 2001. ‘Buddhist Saints in Ancient Vedisa’. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 3.11(2): 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186301000244

———. 2009. ‘Relics of the Buddha: Body, Essence, Text’. In Buddhist Stupas in South Asia: Recent Archaeological, Art-Historical, and Historical Perspectives, edited by Jason Hawkes and Akira Shimada, 41–50. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Zin, Monika. 2016. ‘The Buddha’s Relics and the Nāgas an Attempt to Throw Light on Some Depictions in the Amaravati School’. In South Asian Archaeology and Art 2012, Vol. 2. South Asian Religions and Visual Forms in their Archaeological Context, edited by Vincent Lefevre, Aurore Didier and Benjamin Mutin, 757–776. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.