View Book

How to Do Things with Myths

ID: 3233 - View Book Page - Edit In OJS

How to Do Things with Myths: A Performative Theory of Myths and How We Got There assembles a radically updated collection of the author’s oft-cited publications on myth. Together, they tell how theories of myth have changed and led to a novel “performative” theory of myth. Beginning from its mid-19th -century foundations with philologist, Friedrich Max Müller, myths had been conceived in textual terms as quasi-biblical, static narratives. Not until the impact of ethnographic studies of traditional societies in the early 20th -century did myths come to be regarded in situ as living agents shaping their societies. Leading a movement against Müller’s static, textual view of myths were his French sociological critics, notably Émile Durkheim and his équipe. The Durkheimians felt that myths mattered because of what they “did” by functioning within human societies. Adopting the Durkheimian notion of function was Bronislaw Malinowski. But as a pragmatist and positivist, Malinowski narrowed his conception of myths to utilitarian terms. In place of Malinowski’s utilitarianism, the author proposes a “performative theory” of myths – a theory freeing myths for a wider range of agency in culture, unrestricted by Malinowski’s behaviorism and positivism. Conceived as “important stories,” myths can thus “do things” in many, often subtle and unquantifiable, ways, depending upon a given culture’s own value system. Conceptually and theoretically, a performative theory situates itself with respect to the efforts of some of the most popular contemporary myth theorists -- Bruce Lincoln, Mircea Eliade, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Georges Dumézil, Robert A. Segal and Jonathan Z. Smith.

Published: Feb 15, 2025


Section Chapter Authors
Chapter 1
Introduction: Myths, Performatives, Performances and Performers Ivan Strenski
Chapter 2
“Sola Scriptura”: Max Müller’s Theory of Myths Ivan Strenski
Chapter 3
French Connections: Durkheimian Ritualism Replaces Müller’s Hegemony of Myth Ivan Strenski
Chapter 4
About Henri Hubert: Durkheim’s Mythologist Ivan Strenski
Chapter 5
What Lévi-Strauss May or May Not Owe to Henri Hubert Ivan Strenski
Chapter 6
Müller’s Legacy, Broken: Malinowski and the Pragmatist Theory of Myths Ivan Strenski
Chapter 7
Taking Responsibility for the Concept of “Myth” Ivan Strenski
Chapter 8
Conceptual Problems for Robert A. Segal and Jonathan Z. Smith Ivan Strenski
Chapter 9
Henri Hubert Undoes Aryanist Political Myths Ivan Strenski
Chapter 10
The Myth of Moscow, Third Rome: What It Seeks to “Do” Ivan Strenski

Reviews

With this book, Ivan Strenski provides a compelling argument for a performative theory of myth. In building his account of what it is that myths do, Strenski brings together his wide-ranging knowledge of the history of the study of myth (debunking a few historiographical myths en passant), epistemological dexterity, and well-chosen case studies that coalesce into a vibrant call for a critical, reflexive, and pragmatic rethinking of one of the central, and indeed problematic, concepts in the study of religion. Strenski has outdone himself.
Nicolas Meylan, Maître d’enseignement et de recherche, Faculté de théologie et de sciences des religions, Université de Lausanne