To vaccinate or not? The disqualification of commercial sources of health advice in an online forum
Issue: Vol 8 No. 3 (2011)
Journal: Communication & Medicine
Subject Areas: Healthcare Communication Linguistics
DOI: 10.1558/cam.v8i3.273
Abstract:
Public health debates in online forums allow the emergence of ordinary practical reasoning about 'official' health information. We used a Discursive Psychology approach to analyse postings in a forum devoted to the discussion of the H1N1 (Swine flu) virus. We identify the discursive practices that contributors use to valorise certain elements in the debate (what they cast as science, rationality and 'proper' scepticism) over others (especially commercial interests, 'charlatanism' and 'profiteering'). A forum participant can be disqualified on the basis of their alleged partiality and interest, if they can be accused of having a commercial stake in the matter. But no such opprobrium results if they have a 'scientific' interest.
Author: Agnès Vayreda, Charles Antaki
References :
Antaki, C., Ardèvol, E., Núñez, F. and Vayreda, A. (2005). ‘For she who knows who she is’: Managing accountability in online forum messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11: 114–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00306.x
Antaki, C. and Wetherell, M. (1999). Show concessions. Discourse Studies 1: 7–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001002
Baym, N. (1998). The emergence of online community. In S. G. Jones (ed.) Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Communication and Community 35–68. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. and Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society 27 (4): 495–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404598004035
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. A. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Heritage, J. C. and Watson, D. R. (1979) Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology 123–162. New York: Irvington.
Kasper, G. (2009). Categories, context, and comparison in conversation analysis. In H. Nguyen and G. Kasper (eds) Talk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives 1–28. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i.
Lamerichs, J. and te Molder H. F. M. (2003). Computer mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media & Society 5 (4): 451–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144480354001
Maltz, T. (1996). Customary law and power in internet communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2 (1). Retrieved April 10, 2010 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue1/custom.html
Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potental of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society 6: 259–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444
Polat, R. K. (2005). The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication 20: 435–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058251
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00148128
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimising claims. Human Studies 9 (2-3): 219–229.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation Vols 1 and 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sandaunet, A. (2008). A space for suffering? Communicating breast cancer in an online self-help context. Qualitative Health Research 18 (12): 1631–1641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732308327076
Sneijder, P. and te Molder H. F. M. (2004). ‘Health should not have to be a problem’: Talking health and accountability in an Internet forum on veganism. Journal of Health Psychology 9 (4): 599–616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1359105304044046
Sneijder, P. and te Molder H. F. M. (2005). Moral logic and logical morality: Attributions of responsibility and blame in online discourse on veganism. Discourse & Society 16 (5): 675–696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926505054941
Tidwell. A. (1999). The virtual agora: Online ethical dialogues and professional communities. First Monday 4 (17), pages 6-14, University of Illinois at Chicago, available at http://pear.accc.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/679/589, last accessed 21 May 2010
Vayreda, A. and Antaki, C. (2009). Social support and unsolicited advice in a bipolar disorder online. Qualitative Health Research 19 (7): 931–942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338952
Veen, M., te Molder, H. F. M., Gremmen, B. and van Woerkum, C. (2010). Quitting is not an option: An analysis of online diet talk between celiac disease patients. Health 14 (1): 23–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363459309347478