Informed consent: Towards improved lay-friendliness of patient information sheets
Issue: Vol 10 No. 3 (2013)
Journal: Communication & Medicine
Subject Areas: Healthcare Communication Linguistics
Abstract:
Regional research ethics committee (REC) members have voiced a need for the linguistic improvement of informed consent documents to ensure duly informed consent and to ease committee deliberation. We have little knowledge of what elements of language use hamper comprehension, or of the extent of medical researchers’ appreciation of this problem and their willingness to accept intervention. This qualitative, explorative study proposes an intervention design and tests its feasibility and acceptability. Semi-structured interviews with potential REC applicants informed a linguistic intervention benchmarked against existing guidelines, mandated locally and nationally, and then evaluated quantitatively in a semi-controlled set-up and qualitatively via questionnaires. Potential applicants professed the psychological acceptability of linguistic intervention. The intervention comprised a downloadable Microsoft Word template outlining information structure, a detailed guideline offering advice for each move and self-selected linguistic screening. It was used by 14 applicants and had a measurable effect on REC deliberation time and approval rates. The intervention instruments overall made it easier for applicants to produce informed consent documents meeting prescribed ethical standards concerning lay-friendliness. In conclusion, it was found that linguistic intervention is relevant, feasible and psychologically acceptable to REC applicants; it aids their text production process and seems to enhance the lay-friendliness of these texts.
Author: Morten Pilegaard, Hanne Berg Ravn
References :
Askehave, I. and Zethsen, K. K. (2000) Medical texts made simple – Dream or reality? Hermes, Journal of Linguistics 25: 63–74.
Askehave, I. and Zethsen, K. K. (2002) Translating for laymen. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 10 (1): 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2002.9961431
Askehave, I. and Zethsen, K. K. (2003) Communication barriers in public discourse. Document Design 4 (1): 23–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dd.4.1.03ask
Askehave, I. and Zethsen, K. K. (2008) Mandatory genres: The case of European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) summaries. Text & Talk 28 (2): 167–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.008
Beardsley, E. and Mileskin, M. J. (2007) Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: So why are they lengthening? Journal of Clinical Oncology 25 (9): 13–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3341
Bjørn, E., Rossel, P. and Holm, S. (1999) Can the written information to research subjects be improved? An empirical study. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3): 263–267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.3.263
Central Videnskabsetisk Komité (2011) Vejledning [Guideline]. København: Den Centrale Videnskabsetiske Komité. http://www.cvk.sum.dk/forskere/vejledning%20modul.aspx
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1978) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, A. C., Fallowfield, L. J. and Jensins, V. A. (2006) Communication and informed consent in phase 1 trials: A review of the literature. Support Care Cancer 14 (4): 303–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0916-2
Davis, T. C., Holcombre, R. F. and Berkel, H. J. (1998) Informed consent for clinical trials. A comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. Journal of National Cancer Institute 90: 668–674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.9.668
De Melo-Martin, I. and Ho, A. (2008) Beyond informed consent: The therapeutic misconception and trust. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3): 202–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.019406
Flesch, R. (1948) A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32 (2): 221–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
Fry, E. (1968) A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading 11 (7): 513–516.
Goffman, E. (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements of social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18 (3): 213–231.
Gunning, R. (1952) The Technique of Clear Writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hammerschmidt, D. E. and Keane, M. A. (1992a) Impact on readability of consent forms for research. American Journal of Medical Science 304 (6): 348–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199212000-00003
Hammerschmidt, D. E. and Keane, M. A. (1992b) Institutional review board lacks impact on the readability of consent forms for research. American Journal of Medical Science 304: 341–351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000441-199212000-00003
Holmes-Rovner, M., Stableford, S., Fagerlin, A., Wei, J. T., Dunn, R. L., Ohene-Frempong, J., Kelly-Blake, K. and Rovner, D. R. (2005) Evidence-based patient choice: A prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 5: 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-5-16
Mackenzie, I. S., Wei, L., Rutherford, D., Findlay, E. A., Saywood, W., Campbell, M. K. and Macdonald, T. M. (2010) Promoting public awareness of randomised clinical trails using the media. The ‘Get Randomised’ campaign. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 69 (2): 128–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03561.x
Manson, N. and O’Neill, O. (2011) Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matiasek, J. and Wynia, M. K. (2008) Reconceptualizing the informed consent process at eight innovative hospitals. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 34 (3): 127–137.
Michie, S. and Lester, K (2005) Words matter: Increasing the implementation of clinical guidelines. Quality and Safety in Health Care 14 (5): 367–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2005.014100
Nisbeth Jensen, M. and Zethsen, K. K. (2012) Translation of patient information leaflets: Trained translators and pharmacists-cum-translators – a comparison. In V. Montalt and M. Shuttleworth (eds) Translation and Knowledge Mediation in medical and Health settings. Special issue of Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series. Themes in Translation Studies 11: 31–49.
Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Taylor, H. A. and Brancati, F. L. (2003) Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine 348 (8): 721–726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa021212
Pandiya, A. (2010) Readability and comprehensibility of informed consent forms for clinical trials. Paterson Institute for Cancer Research 1 (3): 89–100.
Paris, A., Nogueira da Gama Chaves, D., Cornu, C., Maison, P., Salvat-Mélis, M., Ribuot, C., Brandt, C., Bosson, J. L., Hommel, M. and Cracowski, J. L. (2007) Improvement of the comprehension of written information given to healthy volunteers in biomedical research: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology 21: 207–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00472.x
Pilegaard, M. and Frandsen, F, (1996) Text type. In J. Verschueren, J. O. Östman, J. Blommaert and C. Bulcaen (eds) Handbook of Pragmatics, 1–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pilegaard, M. and Ravn, H. B. (2011) Readability of patient information can be improved. Danish Medical Journal 59 (5): A4408. http://www.danmedj.dk/portal/page/portal/danmedj.dk/dmj_forside/PAST_ISSUE/2012/DMJ_2012_05/A4408
Potter, N. N. (2002) How Can I be Trusted? A Virtue Theory of Trustworthiness. Lanham, Maryland, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sand, K., Eik-Nes, N. L. and Loge, J. H. (2012) Readability of informed consent documents (1987–2007) for clinical trials: A linguistic analysis. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7 (4): 67–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.67
Schenker , Y., Fernandez, A., Sudore, R. and Schillinger, D. (2011) Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: A systematic review. Medical Decision Making 31 (1): 151–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10364247
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terblanch, M. and Burgess, L. (2010) Examining the readability of patient-informed consent forms. Journal of Clinical Trials 2: 157–162.
Terranova, G., Ferro, M., Carpeggiani, C., Recchia, V., Braga, L., Semelka, R. C. and Picano, E. (2012) Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology. JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging 5 (6): 649–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.007
Vaughn, L. (2010) Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Health Organization Research Ethics Review Committee (2011) Informed Consent Form for Clinical Studies. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/entity/rpc/research_ethics/icf%20parental%20consent-clinicalstudies.doc
World Medical Association (2013) WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. WMA. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/