Making gender relevant in Spanish-language sports broadcast discourse
Issue: Vol 8 No. 3 (2014)
Journal: Gender and Language
Subject Areas: Gender Studies Linguistics
Abstract:
Using the US Spanish-language television broadcasts of the FIFA Women’s World Cup soccer (football) tournament, the present study offers an analysis of the crucial role that language plays in the gendering of sport. Despite the framing of the coverage as a celebration of women’s participation in sports, this was undermined by the sometimes covert, sometimes overt, objectification, trivialization and patronizing of the players and their sport during the broadcast. We examine the ground-level interactional practices through which this marginalization was achieved. First we consider references to persons, presenting overarching quantitative distributions as well as contextualized examples. We then highlight how gender is brought to the interactional surface and made relevant – to the speakers themselves and to the at-home audience – through the discursive dichotomization of women’s versus men’s soccer, with particular attention to the ways in which topicalization of gender-based differences can pave the way for the recreation of gender-based inequalities. Finally, we illustrate how gendering soccer reflects and transcends the game itself, invoking and reestablishing normative gender roles and expectations in and from society.
Author: Holly R. Cashman, Chase Wesley Raymond
References :
Angelini, J. R. and Billings, A. C. (2010) An agenda that sets the frames: gender, language, and NBC’s Americanized Olympic telecast. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(3): 363–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10368831
Billig, M. (1999a) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society 10(4): 543–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004005
Billig, M. (1999b) Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse and Society 10(4): 572–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004007
Billings, A. C. (2008) Olympic Media: Inside the Biggest Show on Television. London: Routledge.
Bowcher, W. L. (2003) Speaker contributions in radio sports commentary. Text 23(4): 445–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.018
Bruce, T. (2008) Women, sport and the media: a complex terrain. In C. Obel, T. Bruce and S. M. Thompson (eds) Outstanding Research about Women and Sport in New Zealand 51–71. Hamilton: Wilf Malcolm Institute.
Bucholtz, M. (2001) The whiteness of nerds: superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1): 84–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.84
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Clayman, S. E. and Heritage, J. (2002) The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Language Use in Institutional and Work-Place settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eliasson, I. (2011) Gendered socialization among girls and boys in children’s football teams in Sweden. Soccer and Society 12(6): 820–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2011.609682
Fishman, P. (1978) Interaction: the work women do. Social Problems 25: 397–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800492
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Goodwin, C. (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Heritage, J. (1984a) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. (1984b) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. and Clayman, S. E. (2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135
Jefferson, G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kennedy, R. and Zamuner, T. S. (2006) Nicknames and the lexicon of sports. American Speech 81: 387–422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2006-026
Kitzinger, C. (2005a) Heteronormativity in action: reproducing normative heterosexuality in ‘after hours’ calls to the doctor. Social Problems 52: 477–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477
Kitzinger, C. (2005b) ‘Speaking as a heterosexual’: (how) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction 38: 221–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3803_2
Kitzinger, C. (2007) Is ‘woman’ always relevantly gendered? Gender and Language 1(1): 39–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/genl.2007.1.1.39
Lakoff, R. T. (1975) Language and Women’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
Land, V. and Kitzinger, C. (2005) Speaking as a lesbian: correcting the heterosexist presumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38: 371–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_1
Maltz, D. N. and Borker, R. A. (1982) A cultural approach to male–female miscommunications. In J. J. Gumperz (ed.) Language and Social Identity 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meân, L. (2001) Identity and discursive practice on the football pitch. Discourse and Society 12(6): 789–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012006004
Meân, L. J. and Halone, K. K. (2010) Sport, language, and culture: issues and intersections. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(3): 253–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X10368830
Mendoza-Denton, N. (1999) Turn initial no: collaborative opposition among Latina adolescents. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang and L. A. Sutton (eds) Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse 273–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Messner, M. A. (1988) Sports and male domination: the female athlete as contested ideological terrain. Sociology of Sport Journal 5: 197–211.
Messner, M. A., Duncan, M. C. and Jensen, K. (1993) Separating the men from the girls: the gendered language of televised sports. Gender and Society 7(1): 121–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124393007001007
Pomerantz, A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, vols 1 and 2 (ed. G. Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. A. (1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987) Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, R. M. B. Giesen and N. Smelser (eds) The Micro-Macro Link 207–34. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988) Goffman and the analysis of conversation. In P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order 89–135. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996) Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (ed.) Studies in Anaphora 437–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
Schegloff, E. A. (1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8(2): 165–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002
Schegloff, E. A. (1998) Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society 9(3): 457–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003006
Schegloff, E. A. (1999a) ‘Schegloff’s texts’ as ‘Billig’s data’: a critical reply to Billig. Discourse and Society 10(4): 558–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004006
Schegloff, E. A. (1999b) Naivete vs. Sophistication or discipline vs. self-indulgence: a rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society 10(4): 577–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010004008
Schegloff, E. A. (2007) A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007
Speer, S. A. and Stokoe, E. (eds) (2011) Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781032
Spender, D. (1980) Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Stivers, T. (2007) Alternative recognitionals in initial references to persons. In N. J. Enfield and T. Stivers (eds) Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives 73–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T. and Rossano, F. (2010) Mobilizing Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 3–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258
Stokoe, E. H. and Smithson, J. (2001) Making gender relevant: the construction and negotiation of gender categories in discourse. Discourse and Society 12(2): 243–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012002005
Sznycer, K. (2010) Strategies of powerful self-presentations in the discourse of female tennis players. Discourse and Society 21(4): 458–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926510366098
Sznycer, K. (2013) Strong female speakers: the resistant discourse of tennis players. Gender and Language 7(3): 303–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/genl.v7i3.303
Tudor, A. (2009) World Cup worlds: media coverage of the soccer World Cup 1974 to 2002. In A. A. Raney and J. Bryant (eds) Handbook of Sports Media 232–46. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
Walther, J. B. (2004) Language and communication technology. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23: 384–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04269584
Weatherall, A. (2002) Towards understanding gender and talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society 13(6): 767–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013006756
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society 1(2): 125–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
Wetherell, M. (1998) Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9(3): 387–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005
Whalen, M. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1987) Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 172–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2786750
Whitehead, K. A. (2009) ‘Categorizing the categorizer’: the management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 74(4): 325–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200406
Whitehead, K. A. and Lerner, G. (2009) When are persons ‘white’? On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction. Discourse and Society 20(5): 613–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926509106413
Zimmerman, D. H. (1998) Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe (eds) Identities in Talk 87–106. London: Sage.