Categorial feminism: New media and the rhetorical work of assessing a sexist, humorous, misogynistic, realistic advertisement
Issue: Vol 8 No. 2 (2014) Gender, language and the media
Journal: Gender and Language
Subject Areas: Gender Studies Linguistics
Abstract:
This article focuses on online assessments of a controversial British television advertisement. Across blogs, websites and forums, a range of stances emerged in debates about its possible “sexism”, “humour”, “misogyny”, or “realism”. The analytic interest here is in the ways that assessors invoked “f-” categories (e.g., “feminism”, “feminist”) as part of their assessments: across the data corpus, people would locate themselves or others in relation to “feminism”, where “feminism” was variously old-fashioned, modern, prejudiced, vital, dogmatic, complex, and/or many other things besides. To account for this variability, the article pursues an ethnomethodologically-oriented policy of treating categories not as vectors for in-the-head social attitudes, but as resources for on-the-screen social actions. Categories thus became analysable not for what they revealed about their authors’ real thoughts vis-a-vis feminism, but for how they functioned as crucial components of recipient-designed online assessments. Studying examples of positive and negative assessments, the paper subsequently shows that and how users claimed or denied their own (or some others’) allegiance to “f-” categories as a method for strengthening their own (or undermining others’) assessments. A concluding discussion considers the wider applications of a categorial approach to feminism in a world of increasingly mediated interaction.
Author: Frederick Attenborough
References :
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957) Intention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ashmore, M. (1993) The theatre of the blind: starring a promethean prankster, a phoney phenomenon, a prism, a pocket, and a piece of wood. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 67–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631293023001003
Attenborough F (2010) Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the rhetorical construction of ‘bad’ scientific work. Public Understanding of Science 19(6): 1–15.
Attenborough, F. (2011) ‘I don’t f***ing care!’ Marginalia and the (textual) negotiation of an academic identity by university students. Discourse and Communication 5(2): 99–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750481310395447
Attenborough, F. (2013) Sexism re-loaded … or sexism re-presented? Irrelevant precision and the British press. Feminist Media Studies 13(4): 693–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.700524
Attenborough, F. (2014) Jokes, pranks, blondes and banter: recontextualising sexism in the British print press. Journal of Gender Studies 23(2): 137–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2013.774269
Attenborough, F. and Stokoe, E. (2012) Student life; student identity; student experience: ethnomethodological methods for pedagogical matters. Psychology Learning and Teaching 11(1): 6–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.1.6
Benson, D. and Hughes, J. (1983) The Perspective of Ethnomethodology. Harlow: Longman.
Benwell, B. M. and Stokoe, E. (2006) Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Budgeon, S. (2001) Emergent feminist(?) identities: young women and the practice of micropolitics. European Journal of Women’s Studies 8(7): 7–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050680100800102
Cameron, D. (1998) ‘Is there any ketchup, Vera?’ Gender, power and pragmatics. Discourse and Society 9(4): 435–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009004002
Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. New York: Oxford University Press.
Drew, P. and Holt, E. (1989) Complainable matters: the use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems 35: 398–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/800594
Edwards, D. (2005) Moaning, whinging and laughing: the subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies 7(1): 5–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445605048765
Edwards, D. (2007) Managing subjectivity in talk. In A. Hepburn, S. Wiggins (eds) Discursive Research in Practice 31–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, D. (2012) Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology 51(3): 425–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02103.x
Edwards, D. and Stokoe, E. (2004) Discursive psychology, focus groups interviews and participants’ categories. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 22: 499–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/0261510042378209
Eglin, P. and Hester, S. (2003) The Montreal Massacre. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Genz, S. (2006) Third way/ve: the politics of postfeminism. Feminist Theory 7(3): 333–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1464700106069040
Gill, R. (2007) Postfeminist media culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 10(2): 147–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075898
Goffman, E. (1979) Footing. Semiotica 25: 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1
Goldman, R. (1992) Reading Ads Socially. London: Routledge.
Griffin, C., Szmigin, I., Bengry-Howell, A., Hackley, C. and Mistral, W. (2012) Inhabiting the contradictions: hypersexual femininity and the culture of intoxication among young women in the UK. Feminism and Psychology 23(2): 184–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353512468860
Harré, R. (1979) Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds) (1983) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, S., Vares, T. and Gill, R. (2012) ‘The whole playboy mansion image’: girls’ fashioning and fashioned selves within a postfeminist culture. Feminism and Psychology 23(2): 143–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353511433790
Jayyusi, L. (1984) Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge.
Karsch, M. (2004) Feminismus fuer Eilige. Berlin: Aufbau Taschenbuch Verlag.
Marlin, R. (1984) The rhetoric of action description. Informal Logic 6: 26–9.
McRobbie, A. (2004) Notes on postfeminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender regime. In A. Harris (ed.) All About the Girl: Culture, Power and Identity 3–14. London: Routledge.
Mehan, H. and Wood, H. (1975) The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.
Piirainen-Marsh, A. and Jauni, H. (2012) Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews. Text and Talk 32(5): 637–60.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) Giving a source a basis: the practice in conversation of telling ‘how I know’. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 607–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90002-X
Rúdólfdóttir, A. and Jolliffe, R. (2008) ‘I don’t think people really talk about it that much’: young women discuss feminism. Feminism and Psychology 18(2): 268–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353507083098
Saatchi & Saatchi (2012) (Santa) hats off to ASDA this Christmas. Available at www.saatchi.co.uk/work/santa_hats_off_to_asda_this_christmas (accessed 11 May 2014).
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation (vols. I & II). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243
Scharff, C. (2011) ‘It is a colour thing and a status thing, rather than a gender thing’: negotiating difference in talk about feminism. Feminism and Psychology. 21(4): 458–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353511419816
Schegloff, E. (1996) Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: a partial sketch of a systematics. In B. Fox (ed.) Studies in Anaphora 437–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.14sch
Speer, S. and Stokoe, E. (2011) Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781032
Stokoe, E. (2010) Gender, conversation analysis, and the anatomy of membership categorization practices. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4(7): 428–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00261.x
Stokoe, E. (2012a) Moving forward with MCA: methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 14(3): 277–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534
Stokoe, E. (2012b) Categorial systematics. Discourse Studies 14(3): 345–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441543
Travers-Scott, D. (2010) Feminism and media theory in two interactive media properties. Feminist Media Studies 10(4): 457–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2010.514118
Woolgar, S. (1988) Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.