Who has the power to act in the world? Social actors, agency and voice in a Catholic newspaper
Issue: Vol 9 No. 3 (2012) Discourse and Responsibility
Journal: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice
Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics
Abstract:
This paper investigates the construction of social responsibility in a sample of articles taken from The Universe, a popular Catholic newspaper, in the late 1990s. It explores the representation of society, agency, voice, and social responsibility in a selection of articles dealing with social issues. The analysis identifies the principal social actors referred to in the texts; which of these are constructed as playing active roles; which are given voice; and for what purposes this voice is used. A distinctive pattern of construction of social responsibility is identified, in which there are three main groups of social actors: those who need help; those who are in a position to provide help (principally Governments, politicians, and multinational organisations); and those who speak on behalf of the former to the latter (principally Church organisations). I argue that this constructs a representation of the world in which the power and responsibility to act for change is largely held by elite groups, and the role of activist organisations is largely to appeal to the powerful to change things. Ordinary people watch this happening, and those disadvantaged groups who are acted for in these texts have little or no voice or active agency.
Author: Karin Tusting
References :
Achugar, M. (2007) Between remembering and forgetting: Uruguayan military discourse about human rights (1976–2004). Discourse & Society 18 (5): 521–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926507079632
Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalization: the Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Moon, R. (2010) ‘Curvy, hunky, kinky’: Using corpora as tools for critical analysis. Discourse & Society 21 (2): 99–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353843
Canto-Mila, N. and Lozano, J. M. (2009) The Spanish discourse on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Busisness Ethics 87 (1): 157–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9810-4
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Frouws, J. (1998) The contested redefinition of the countryside: An analysis of rural discourses in the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 38 (1): 54–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00063
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second edition. London: Edward Arnold.
KhosraviNik, M. (2009) The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society 20 (4): 477–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104024
KhosraviNik, M. (2010) The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics 9 (1): 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.1.01kho
Leech, G. and Short, M. (1981) Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Longman.
Taracena, R. (2002) Social actors and discourse on abortion in the Mexican press: The Paulina case. Reproductive Health Matters 10 (19): 103–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00027-7
Tusting, K. (2000) Written Intertextuality and the Construction of Catholic Identity in a Parish Community: An Ethnographic Study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) The representation of social actors. In C. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, 32–70. London: Routledge.