Item Details

Somewhere between evil and normal: Traces of morality in a child-protection helpline

Issue: Vol 9 No. 2 (2012) Morality in Professional Practice

Journal: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice

Subject Areas: Writing and Composition Linguistics

DOI: 10.1558/japl.v9i2.25732

Abstract:

This article considers the way commonplace moral actions such as expressing disapproval and offering sympathy are managed in interaction on a child protection helpline. Although the helpline routinely engages with callers’ reports of traumatic events such as child neglect and abuse, overt moral assessments by call takers such as expressions of disapproval and displays of sympathy are much less common. We argue that this resistance to displays of sympathy and disapproval by call takers relates to key institutional tasks of (a) gathering information for referral to other services and offering advice; (b) avoiding actions that could disrupt the necessary interrogation of reports; and (c) holding off alignment with precise versions of events and responsibility that are often the very thing at stake in the call. Nevertheless, call takers may use more indirect traces of morality such as prosodic inflections or precisely positioned ‘tut’ particles to acknowledge the relevance or moral evaluations while not disrupting the trajectory of the report and its assessment. More broadly, this illustrates some of the complex ways in which moral practices are refined and transformed in institutional settings.

Author: Jonathan Potter, Alexa Hepburn

View Original Web Page

References :

Bergmann, J. R. (1998) Introduction: Morality in discourse. Research on Language and
Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 279–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594
Curl, T., Drew, P. and Ogden, R. (n.d.) Complaining: Affiliation and disaffiliation in
complaint sequences in conversation. Unpublished manuscript.
Drew, P. (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and
Social Interaction 31 (3–4): 295–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3103&4_2
Edwards, D. (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/
9781446221785
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Hepburn, A. (2004) Crying: Notes on description, transcription and interaction.
Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (3): 251–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/
s15327973rlsi3703_1
Hepburn, A. (2005) ‘You’re not takin’ me seriously’: Ethics and asymmetry in calls to a
child protection helpline. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 18 (3): 253–274. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720530590948836
Hepburn, A. and Potter, J. (2003) Discourse analytic practice. In C. Seale, D. Silverman,
J. Gubrium and G. Gobo (eds) Qualitative Research Practice, 180–196. London: Sage.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d1
Hepburn, A. and Potter, J. (2007) Crying receipts: Time, empathy, and institutional
practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction 40 (1): 89–116. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/08351810701331299
Hepburn, A. and Potter, J. (2012) Crying and crying responses. In A. Peräkylä and
M.-L. Sorjonen (eds) Emotion in Interaction, 195–211. New York: Oxford University
Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0009
Hepburn, A. and Wiggins, S. (2005) Size matters: Constructing accountable bodies in
NSPCC helpline interaction. Discourse & Society 16 (5): 625–645. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1177/0957926505054939
Hepburn, A. and Wiggins, S. (eds) (2007) Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches
to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1017/cbo9780511611216
Heritage, J. (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In
J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, 299–345. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511665868.020
Heritage J. (2012) The epistemic engine: Action formation, sequence organization and
territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1986) Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and
response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology 92 (1): 110–157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228465
Heritage, J. and Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across
sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of questioning design. Language in Society 23 (1):
1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500017656
Jefferson, G. (1981) The Abominable ‘ne?’: A Working Paper Exploring the Phenomenon
of Post-Response Pursuit of Response. Manchester Sociology Occasional Papers, No. 6.
Manchester: University of Manchester.
Nikander, P. (2002) Age in Action: Membership Work and Stage of Life Categories in Talk.
Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
Pomerantz, A. M. (1984) Giving a source a basis: The practice in conversation of
telling ‘how I know’. Journal of Pragmatics 8 (5–6): 607–625. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/0378-2166(84)90002-x
Pomerantz, A. M. (1987) Descriptions in legal settings. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds)
Talk and Social Organization, 226–243. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London:
Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119
Potter, J. and Hepburn, A. (2003) ‘I’m a bit concerned’: Early actions and psychological
constructions in a child protection helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction
36 (3): 197–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3603_01
Stivers, T. (2004) ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human
Communication Research 30 (2): 260–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.2.260
Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, S. (2011) Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social
interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada and J. Steensig (eds) The Morality of Knowledge in
Conversation, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E. and Hepburn, A. (2005) ‘You can hear a lot through the walls’: Noise formulations
in neighbour complaints. Discourse & Society 16 (5): 647–673. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1177/0957926505054940