A stitch in time: Instructing temporality in the operating room
Issue: Vol 12 No. 1 (2015)
Journal: Communication & Medicine
Subject Areas: Healthcare Communication Linguistics
Abstract:
This paper examines how time is made explicitly relevant in the way the attending surgeon monitors and corrects the performance of a resident during a kidney transplant surgery. In so doing, we observe how the attending constitutes time as a significant and constituent feature of the surgical actions performed by the resident. In order to instruct temporal competence in the performance of surgical procedures, the attending surgeon identifies and makes instructably observable the temporally significant features of the surgical work just as that work is performed, by (a) producing countdowns, pace prompts, and temporal accounts when and as avoidable errors occur, and (b) planning and coordinating current and upcoming actions in relation to other actions. Instructing a trainee in the temporal features of his/her performance occurs when the attending (a) coordinates the production of specific verbal tokens, remarks, and accounts with specific actions performed by the resident as the resident performs them, or (b) anticipates the performance of subsequent actions in relation to current surgical actions underway. This case demonstrates how temporality becomes an observably instructable matter in interaction.
Author: Alan Zemel, Timothy Koschmann
References :
Atkinson, P. (1988) Ethnomethodology: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1): 441–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.002301
Bezemer, J., Cope, A., Kress, G. and Kneebone, R. (2013) Holding the scalpel: Achieving surgical care in a learning environment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 43 (1): 38–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891241613485905
Boden, D. (1997) Temporal frames: Time and talk in organizations. Time & Society 6 (1): 5–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463X97006001001
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993) English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.25
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Selting, M. (1996) Towards an interactional perspective of prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds) Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, 11–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511597862.003
Garfinkel, H. (2006) Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Goodwin, C. (2002) Time in action. Current Anthropology 43 (S4): S19–S35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339566
Hindmarsh, J. and Pilnick, A. (2007) Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies 28 (9): 1395–1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840607068258
Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P. and Dunne, S. (2011) Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 489–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.008
Jefferson, G. (1989) Notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum silence’ of one second in conversation. In P. Bull and D. Roger (eds) Conversation, 166–196. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Macbeth, D. (2011) Understanding understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 438–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.006
Mondada, L. (2011) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin and C. LeBaron (eds) Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 207–226. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mondada, L. (2014) Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies 16 (2): 131–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515325
Nevile, M. (2007a) Action in time: Ensuring timeliness for collaborative work in the airline cockpit. Language in Society 36 (2): 233–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070121
Nevile, M. (2007b) Talking without overlap in the airline cockpit: Precision timing at work. Text & Talk: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 27 (2): 225–249.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, A. W. (2005) Garfinkel’s conception of time. Time & Society 14 (2–3): 163–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961463X05055132
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. (1996) Confirming allusions: Towards an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 104 (1): 161–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230911
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., De Ruiter, J. and Yoon, K.-E. (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (26): 10587–10592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106
Stivers, T. and Robinson, J. D. (2006) A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047404506060179
Svensson, M. S., Luff, P. and Heath, C. (2009) Embedding instruction in practice: Contingency and collaboration during surgical training. Sociology of Health & Illness 31 (6): 889–906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01195.x
Wells, B. and Macfarlane, S. (1998) Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech 41 (3–4): 265–294.
Wilson, T. P. (1991). Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (eds) Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, 22–43. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wilson, T. P. and Zimmerman, D. H. (1986) The structure of silence between turns in two-party conversation. Discourse Processes 9 (4): 375–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638538609544649
Zemel, A. and Koschmann, T. (2014) ‘Put your fingers right in here’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies 16 (2): 163–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515359
Zemel, A., Koschmann, T. D. and LeBaron, C. (2011) Pursuing a response: Prodding recognition and expertise within a surgical team. In C. Goodwin, C. LeBaron and J. Streeck (eds) Multimodality and Human Activity, 227–242. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.