References :

Alvesson, Mats and André Spicer. 2012. “A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations”. Journal of Management Studies 49(7): 1194–1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x

Ambasciano, Leonardo. 2014. Sciamanesimo senza sciamanesimo. Le radici intellettuali del modello sciamanico di Mircea Eliade: evoluzionismo, psicoanalisi, te(le)ologia (Shamanism without Shamanism. The Intellectual Roots of Mircea Eliade’s Shamanic Paradigm: Evolutionism, Psychoanalysis, Theo-teleology). Rome: Nuova Cultura.

———. 2015. “Homo mendax, Fictional Heroes and Self-Deception: A Brief Commentary on The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human.” Studi e Materiali di Storia delle Religioni 81(1): 239–247.

———. 2016. “Mind the (Unbridgeable) Gaps: A Cautionary Tale about Pseudoscientific Distortions and Scientific Misconceptions in the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (28)2: 141–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341372

Bird, Alexander. 2008. The Historical Turn in the Philosophy of Science. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, edited by Martin Curd and Stathis Psillos, 67–77. Abingdon: Routledge.

Blancke, Stefaan and Johan De Smedt. 2013. “Evolved to Be Irrational? Evolutionary and Cognitive Foundations of Pseudosciences.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 361–380. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0020

Boudry, Maarten. 2013. “Loki’s Wager and Laudan’s Error: On Genuine and Territorial Demarcation.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 79–98. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0006

Boudry, Maarten, Stefaan Blancke and Massimo Pigliucci. 2014. “What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience”. Philosophical Psychology 28(8): 1177–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.971946

Buekens, Filip. 2013. “Agentive Thinking and Illusions of Understanding.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 439–458. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0024

Chitwood, Ken. 2015. “Human Consciousness & Religious Reality.” The Religious Studies Project, September 24. http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/2015/09/24/human-consciousness-religious-reality/

Cioffi, Frank. 2013. Pseudoscience: The Case of Freud’s Sexual Etiology of the Neuroses. In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 321–340. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0018

Cipolla, Carlo M. 2011 [1976]. The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity. Bologna: il Mulino.

Cleland, Carol E. Cleland and Sheralee Brindell. 2013. “Science and the Messy, Uncontrollable World of Nature.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 183–202. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Corless, Roger. 1993. “After Eliade, What?” Religion 23(4): 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.1993.1031

Coyne, Jerry A. 2013a. “Tom Nagel’s Antievolution Book Gets Thrice Pummeled.” Why Evolution Is True. January 23. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/tom-nagels-antievolution-book-gets-thrice-pummeled/

———. 2013b. “Does Consciousness Refute Materialism? The Chronicle of Higher Education Promotes Woo”. Why Evolution Is True, April 1. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2014/04/01/does-conscousness-prove-transhumanism-the-chronicle-of-higher-education-promotes-woo/

———. 2014. “Science is Being Bashed by Academics Who Should Know Better.” New Republic. April 3. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117244/jeffrey-kripals-anti-materialist-argument-promotes-esp?fb_action_ids=10203621173756569&fb_action_types=og.likes

Dembski, William. 2005. “Intelligent Design.” In Encyclopedia of Religion, Volume 7, second edition, edited by Lindsay Jones, 4515–4518. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Eliade, Mircea. 1956. “Histoire des religions et parapsychologie.” La Tour Saint Jacques 6–7: 96–101, 102–107.

———. 2006 [1937]. “Folklore as an Instrument for Knowledge” (Folclorul ca instrument de cunoaştere). In Mircea Eliade: A Critical Reader, edited by Bryan S. Rennie, translated by Mac Linscott Ricketts, 25–37. Sheffield: Equinox.

Embree, Ainslie T. 2005. “Tilak, Bal Gangadhar.” In Encyclopedia of Religion, Volume 13, second edition, edited by Lindsay Jones, 9198–9200. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.

Fales, Evan. 2013. “Is a Science of Supernatural Possible?” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 247–262. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0014

Ferraris, Maurizio. 2014 [2012]. Manifesto of New Realism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Forrest, Barbara. 2013. “Navigating the Landscape Between Science and Religious Pseudoscience: Can Hume Help?” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 263–283. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0015

Ginzburg, Carlo. 2010. “Mircea Eliade’s Ambivalent Legacy.” In Hermeneutics, Politics, and the History of Religions: The Contested Legacies of Joachim Wach and Mircea Eliade, edited by Christian K. Wedemeyer and Wendy Doniger, 307–323. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195394337.003.0014

Goode, Erich. 2013. “Paranormalism and Pseudoscience as Deviance.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 145–164. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0009

Hakl, Hans Thomas. 2005. “Evola, Julius.” In Encyclopedia of Religion, Volume 5, Second Edition, edited by Lindsay Jones, 2904–2907. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.

Hansson, Sven Ove. 2013. “Defining Pseudoscience and Science.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 61–78. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0005

Hobsbawm, Eric and Terence Ranger, editors. 1992 [1983]. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Humphrey, Nicholas. 1999 [1996]. Leaps of Faith: Science, Miracles, and the Search for Supernatural Consolation. With a New Foreword by Daniel Dennett. New York: Copernicus.

Jerkert, Jesper. 2013. “Why Alternative Medicine Can Be Scientifically Evaluated? Countering the Evasions of Pseudoscience.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 305–320. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0017

Kitagawa, Joseph M. 2005 [1987]. “Eliade, Mircea [First Edition]”. In Encyclopedia of Religion, Volume 4, second edition, edited by Lindsay Jones, 2753–2757. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.

Koertge, Noretta. 2013. “Belief Buddies versus Critical Communities: The Social Organization of Pseudoscience.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 165–180. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0010

Kripal, Jeffrey. 2007a. The Serpent’s Gift: Gnostics Reflections on the Study of Religion. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Kripal, Jeffrey. 2007b. Esalen: America and the Religion of No Religion. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

———. 2011a. “The Future Human: Mircea Eliade and the Fantastic Mutant.” Archævs. Studies in the History of Religions 15(1–2): 187–208.

———. 2011b. Mutants and Mystics: Science Fiction, Superhero Comics, and the Paranormal. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

———. 2012. “Edgewalker: An Interview with Jeffrey J. Kripal, by Erik Davis.” Reality Sandwich. May 14. http://realitysandwich.com/148059/edgewalker_interview_jeffrey_j_kripal/

———. 2014. “Visions of the Impossible: How ‘Fantastic’ Stories Unlock the Nature of Consciousness.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. March 31. http://chronicle.com/article/Embrace-the-Unexplained/145557/

Kripal, Jeffrey with Andrea R. Jain, Erin Prophet and Ata Anzali. 2014. Comparing Religion. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ladyman, James. 2013. “Toward a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 45–60. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0004

Lakatos, Imre. 1989a [1970]. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, volume 1, edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, 8–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakatos, Imre. 1989b [1970]. “History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions.” In The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, volume 1, edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie, 102–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawson, E. Thomas. 2005. “A New Look at the Science-and-Religion Dialogue.” Zygon 40(3): 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00687.x

Luhrmann, Tanya M. 2015. “When Things Happen That You Can’t Explain.” The New York Times. March 5. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/05/opinion/when-things-happen-that-you-cant-explain.html

Mahner, Martin. 2013. “Science and Pseudoscience: How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 29–44. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0003

Martin, Luther H. 2014 [2008]. “The Academic Study of Religion during the Cold War: The Western Perspective.” In Deep History, Secular Theory: Historical and Scientific Studies of Religion, 22–34. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614515005.22

Martin, Luther H. and Donald Wiebe. 2012. “Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80(3):587–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs030

McConeghy, David. 2015. “The Truthiness of Consciousness as the Sacred.” The Religious Studies Project. September 25. http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/2015/09/25/the-truthiness-of-consciousness-as-the-sacred/

McCutcheon, Russell T. 1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2003 [2001]. The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, and Rhetoric. London: Routledge.

Medawar, Peter B. 1987 [1982]. Pluto’s Republic: Incorporating The Art of the Soluble and Induction and Intuition in Scientific Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McCauley, Robert N. 2011. Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nagel, Thomas. 2013. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nickles, Thomas. 2013. “The Problem of Demarcation: History and Future.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 101–120. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0007

O’Connor, June. 2005 [1987]. “Aurobindo Ghose.” In Encyclopedia of Religion, Volume 7, Second Edition, edited by Lindsay Jones, 633–634. Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan.

Parsons, Keith M. 2001. Drawing Out Leviathan: Dinosaurs and the Science Wars. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Pigliucci, Massimo. 2013. “The Demarcation Problem: A (Belated) Response to Laudan.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 9–28. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0002

Pigliucci, Massimo and Maarten Boudry. 2013. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.001.0001

Pigliucci, Massimo and Maarten Boudry. 2014. “Prove It! The Burden of Proof Game in Science vs. Pseudoscience Disputes.” Philosophia 42(2): 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9500-z

Pinker, Steven. 2010. “The Cognitive Niche: Coevolution of Intelligence, Sociality, and Language.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107(2): 8993–8999. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914630107

Popper, Karl. 1999 [1957]. “Prefazione all’edizione italiana.” In Miseria dello storicismo, edited by C. Montaleone, 7–11. Milan: Feltrinelli.

Prothero, Donald R. 2013a. Reality Check. How Science Deniers Threaten Our Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Prothero, Donald. 2013b. “The Holocaust Denier’s Playbook and the Tobacco Smokescreen: Common Threads in the Thinking and Tacticts of Denialists and Pseudoscientists.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 341–358. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0019

Robertson, David G. 2011. “Review of Authors of the Impossible: The Paranormal and the Sacred, by Jeffry J. Kripal.” In International Journal for the Study of New Religions 2(2): 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsnr.v2i2.306

Ruse, Michael. 2013. “Evolution: From Pseudoscience to Popular Science, from Popular Science to Professional Science.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 225–244. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Schwartz, Martin A. 2008. “The Importance of Stupidity in Scientific Research.” Journal of Cell Science 121: 1771. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.033340

Shackel, Nicholas. 2013. “Pseudoscience and Idiosyncratic Theories of Rational Belief.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 417–438. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0023

Shermer, Michael. 2013. “Science and Pseudoscience: The Difference in Practice and the Difference It Makes.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 203–224. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0012

Shermer, Michael. 2015. “Unsolved, Not Supernatural.” The New York Times. March 10. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/opinion/unsolved-not-supernatural.html

Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont. 1998 [1997]. Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosophers’ Abuse of Science. London: Profile.

Sperber, Dan. 2010. “The Guru Effect.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(4): 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0025-0

Talmont-Kaminski, Konrad. 2013. “Werewolves in Scientists’ Clothing: Understanding Pseudoscientific Cognition.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 381–396. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0021

Taves, Ann. 2013. “The Power of the Paranormal (and Extraordinary).” History of Religions 53(2): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1086/673186

Thurs, Daniel P. and Ronald L. Numbers. 2013. “Science, Pseudoscience, and Science Falsely So-called.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 121–144. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0008

van Bendegem, Jean Paul. 2013. “Argumentation and Pseudoscience: The Case for an Ethics of Argumentation.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 287–304. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0016

von Stuckrad, Kocku 2014. The Scientification of Religion: An Historical Study of Discursive Change, 1800–2000. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Urban, Hugh. 2012. Review of Authors of the Impossible: The Paranormal and the Sacred. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. In History of Religions 52(2): 192–195. https://doi.org/10.1086/667213

Widengren, Geo. 1967. “Mircea Eliade Sixty Years Old.” Numen: International Review for the History of Religions 14(3): 165–166. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852767X00139

Wiebe, Donald. 1999. The Politics of Religious Studies. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Wilkins, John S. 2013. “The Salem Region: Two Mindsets about Science.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, 397–416. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0022

Marcus Yullius Cicero. 1856. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, translated by Charles D. Yonge. Volume IV. London: Bohn. Available at: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/cicero-orations-vol-4

Znamenski, Andrei A. 2007. The Beauty of the Primitive: Shamanism and the Western Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195172317.001.0001